agentleFS
IamK77IamK77/Skill/skills/engineering/flightline/SKILL.md

flightline

Skill2 starsChanged 31 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Prepare a reviewable, reproducible change and delivery pipeline. Use for repository hygiene, CI work, or release preparation without implying permission to commit, push, or deploy.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

7 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 6

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Before starting, inspect the project and bind LINT_CMD to its real trusted command with --var 'LINT_CMD=<actual command>'.

    line 28
  2. Very specific:

    When this stage is fulfilled: checklist advance scope --run "$RUN".

    line 43
  3. Very specific:

    Run the bound sensor: checklist verify prepare --run "$RUN".

    line 56
  4. Very specific:

    Only if the check genuinely does not apply: checklist na prepare lint-green --run "$RUN" --reason "<scope reason>".

    line 57
  5. Distinctive:

    If no meaningful linter exists, mark only that sensor N/A with the reason and record the checks actually used.

    line 76
  6. Very specific:

    If an input or permission is missing, name the blocker and leave the relevant item pending.

    line 78
  7. Very specific:

    After all required work and stage closures is recorded, use checklist done --run "$RUN".

    line 84

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md
<!-- Copyright 2026 IamK77 — Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0. See ./LICENSE and ./NOTICE · https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 -->

flightline

Prepare a reviewable, reproducible change and delivery pipeline. Use for repository hygiene, CI work, or release preparation without implying permission to commit, push, or deploy.

Inputs

Change scope; repository conventions; current branch and worktree; expected lint/build/test commands; requested delivery boundary.

Run record

Use checklist 0.5 or newer for this SOP. Reading or reloading the skill must not reset work. For a new task, run checklist init "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}" --new --path "/absolute/project"; retain its returned ID as RUN. For existing work, use checklist resume "$RUN", then checklist show --run "$RUN". Outside Claude, replace the skill-directory variable with this directory’s actual path.

Commands below record work after it is done. Replace evidence placeholders with concise artifact locations and observations. Manual confirmations are not independent proof; a sensor pass covers only the command and inputs it observed. verify does not close a stage; advance checks that its required readings are fulfilled. Use report --run "$RUN" for the retained history.

Before starting, inspect the project and bind LINT_CMD to its real trusted command with --var 'LINT_CMD=<actual command>'. Do not use an echo/no-op to produce a green result. checklist resume "$RUN" --var 'LINT_CMD=<new command>' changes the binding and invalidates earlier readings; commands and output are stored locally, so do not bind secrets.

Procedure

scope

Inspect the current worktree and separate the requested change from unrelated edits. Read the repository contribution and dependency conventions; identify the intended review or delivery boundary.

Record these artifacts after doing the work:

  • Branch, existing changes, and ownership boundaries are recorded. checklist check scope worktree --run "$RUN" --evidence "<artifact and observation>"
  • Required checks and the requested delivery boundary are known. checklist check scope contract --run "$RUN" --evidence "<artifact and observation>"

When this stage is fulfilled: checklist advance scope --run "$RUN".

prepare

Make a focused change, keep generated artifacts aligned with source, and ensure dependency changes are reproducible. Run the real formatter/linter and relevant build/test commands; inspect their outputs rather than accepting a wrapper exit blindly.

Record these artifacts after doing the work:

  • The diff is focused and includes required source/generated artifacts. checklist check prepare diff --run "$RUN" --evidence "<artifact and observation>"
  • Build and dependency reproduction evidence is recorded. checklist check prepare repro --run "$RUN" --evidence "<artifact and observation>"

Run the bound sensor: checklist verify prepare --run "$RUN". A failed or unavailable command is not a successful review. Only if the check genuinely does not apply: checklist na prepare lint-green --run "$RUN" --reason "<scope reason>". N/A stays distinct from pass.

When this stage is fulfilled: checklist advance prepare --run "$RUN".

handoff

Summarise the change, checks, risks, and rollback approach for review. Stop at the requested boundary: preparing a commit is not permission to push it.

Record these artifacts after doing the work:

  • Review notes include exact check results and unresolved issues. checklist check handoff review --run "$RUN" --evidence "<artifact and observation>"
  • Any external delivery action has separate authorisation or is explicitly left pending. checklist check handoff delivery --run "$RUN" --evidence "<artifact and observation>"

When this stage is fulfilled: checklist advance handoff --run "$RUN".

Branches

If no meaningful linter exists, mark only that sensor N/A with the reason and record the checks actually used. Do not install tools or rewrite repository conventions merely to satisfy a template.

If an input or permission is missing, name the blocker and leave the relevant item pending. A changed requirement may need a new run; an accepted checklist edit uses resume "$RUN" --refresh and requires fresh readings. To abandon work, use checklist reset --run "$RUN" --reason "<reason>"; history is retained.

Completion

A reviewable diff and reproducible verification record. Committing, pushing, publishing, and deploying remain separate decisions.

After all required work and stage closures is recorded, use checklist done --run "$RUN". This archives the result without deleting its history; it does not authorise any external action.

Reference shelf

Open the technique relevant to the current step. These notes provide concrete methods and examples, not additional phases; this entrypoint defines the run's completion conditions.

  • A reproducible path from change to delivery
  • A reproducible delivery pipeline
  • Keep style feedback useful and local
  • Size delivery preparation to the task
  • Reproduce the dependency graph you intend to ship
  • Review the intended behaviour and its evidence
  • Record focused work without losing existing changes

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.