type
Skill2 starsChanged 31 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Explore typographic voices, rhythm, and multilingual expression. Use to generate type directions, not to force a modular scale or impose one cultural model of text.
In this repository37 other files it gives its agents.
- canonSkill
- colorSkill
- formSkill
- graphicsSkill
- layoutSkill
- motionSkill
- pilotSkill
- systemsSkill
- holdfastSkill
- aegisSkill
- assaySkill
- flightlineSkill
- gaugeSkill
- groundworkSkill
- gungnirSkill
- husbandrySkill
- load-bearingSkill
- pilotSkill
- plumbSkill
- stationkeepingSkill
- crucibleSkill
- envoySkill
- forgeSkill
- ledgerSkill
- prospectSkill
- reckoningSkill
- forageSkill
- touchstoneSkill
- bearingsSkill
- bulwarkSkill
- keelSkill
- liverySkill
- lookoutSkill
- pilotSkill
- seaworthySkill
- trialsSkill
- wellspringSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 32
Start with real text in the scripts the product serves.
- Distinctive: line 50
Read selectively when a thread needs another perspective or a concrete technique.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
<!--
Copyright 2026 IamK77 — Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0.
See ./LICENSE and ./NOTICE · https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
-->type
Explore typographic voices, rhythm, and multilingual expression. Use to generate type directions, not to force a modular scale or impose one cultural model of text.
Starting point
Typography gives language a body and a pace. Ask who seems to be speaking, how long a thought feels, and what happens when the language changes.
Bring a question, fragment, reference, or tension. Follow whichever association becomes useful; these invitations are not a sequence to complete. Speculation should remain distinguishable from an observed fact.
Thought experiments
Cast a different narrator
Imagine the same content voiced by a navigator, an editor, and a laboratory notebook. Change weight, measure, rhythm, or hierarchy to express the difference.
Translate rhythm across scripts
Start with real text in the scripts the product serves. Let their different textures suggest a shared family resemblance rather than forcing identical metrics.
Break the scale on purpose
Try one discontinuity: a tiny label beside a large statement, an unexpected pause, or a dense block amid spacious text. What meaning does that contrast create?
A possible turn
A financial summary could feel like a ledger through aligned numerals and compact rhythm, or like a letter through narrative hierarchy and generous measure. Both can remain legible; the distinction is the relationship offered to the reader.
Leave the space open
Offer a few genuinely different possibilities, a sketch, an analogy, or a sharper question when useful. Do not turn every prompt into a scored diagnostic, a completion gate, or a demand for an action plan. The human may choose a direction, combine them, or leave the question open.
A selected direction can become tokens in systems. Actual font loading, fallback behaviour, zoom, and long-text cases belong in implementation checks, not creative permission slips.
Optional references
Read selectively when a thread needs another perspective or a concrete technique. The notes supply possibilities, examples, and limits; none is a prerequisite or a requirement to close the exploration.
- A typographic voice across different text
- Reusable spacing with room for meaning
- Features that support actual reading
- Hierarchy and cadence before a ratio
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

