forge-report
Skill2 starsChanged 7 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when delivering a /forge build or fix (eindverslag, wrap up).
2 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Dshamir/slm-forgetheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- ForgeyClap/claude-forgeedited, first seen Oct 11, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- ForgeyClap/claude-forge★ 217% same
Wrote their own version · 1
- Dshamir/slm-forge★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository99 other files it gives its agents.
- docs/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- brainstormingSkill
- claude-md-improverSkill
- dispatching-parallel-agentsSkill
- executing-plansSkill
- finishing-a-development-branchSkill
- forge-a11ySkill
- forge-agent-reportSkill
- forge-agentSkill
- forge-apiSkill
- forge-authSkill
- forge-autoresearchSkill
- forge-botsSkill
- forge-brainstormSkill
- forge-cliSkill
- forge-cmsSkill
- forge-code-reviewSkill
- forge-contextSkill
- forge-councilSkill
- forge-craftSkill
- forge-databaseSkill
- forge-dataSkill
- forge-debugSkill
- forge-deeplearnSkill
- forge-devopsSkill
- forge-docdriftSkill
- forge-doctorSkill
- forge-ecc-adapterSkill
- forge-ecommerceSkill
- forge-electronSkill
- forge-extensionSkill
- forge-figmaSkill
- forge-fullstackSkill
- forge-gameSkill
- forge-graded-verifySkill
- forge-guardianSkill
- forge-heartbeatSkill
- forge-i18n-docsSkill
- forge-intakeSkill
- forge-integrationSkill
- forge-long-form-writingSkill
- forge-mcp-clientsSkill
- forge-memorySkill
- forge-migrationSkill
- forge-mindmapSkill
- forge-mlopsSkill
- forge-mobileSkill
- forge-n8nSkill
- forge-nightshiftSkill
- forge-observabilitySkill
- forge-paymentsSkill
- forge-plan-largeSkill
- forge-prdSkill
- forge-predictionSkill
- forge-projectbrainSkill
- forge-prompt-coachSkill
- forge-qualitySkill
- forge-ragSkill
- forge-registrySkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈0
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 16
Write ALL of these, in this order.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Forge delivery report
Be concrete and honest; reflect only checks that actually ran. Never claim agents/Codex/tests/preview that did not really happen. Do not say "done" if it isn't. Include all sections below.
0. Chat reply vs the file on disk (usage-minimisation)
The sections below are the CONTRACT for .claude/forge-runs/<run_id>/final-report.md — never trimmed, never skipped, always complete on disk. What actually goes in the chat reply is a SHORT summary only: verdict (Section 13's one-line pick) · what changed (2-4 lines, from Sections 3-4) · checks run (Section 5's real commands, one line each) · blockers (Section 11, or "none") · still weak or unverified (Section 15, q11) · next step (Section 14) — then the exact path to the full report for anyone who wants the rest. Never re-paste the whole file into chat by default; the owner can always open the path. A small L1 fix may compress this into 3-5 plain lines. A large/client deliverable still gets this short chat form plus the complete file — never a full re-paste in chat instead of writing the file.
Sections of final-report.md (the on-disk contract)
Write ALL of these, in this order. The required content of each section (tables, allowed statuses and wording) is in references/report-sections.md; open it before writing the file.
1 Classification · 2 Project Adaptation · 2b Mission Blueprint + Skill Discovery · 3 What was done · 4 Files changed · 5 Checks/tests run · 6 Agent Activity Ledger · 6c Rework loop · 6b ECC Status block · 7 Memory Update · 8 Dashboard Update · 8b Command Pack Update · 8c Project governance · 9 Issues found · 10 Issues fixed · 11 Remaining risks · 12 Codex block · 12b Browser proof + Skill Registry + Fresh-install · 13 Final verdict · 14 Next step · 15 Self-review.
Rules that hold in every section
- Section 5 lists actual commands and results only; run
node .claude/forge-bin/forge-verify.cjs <run_id>before declaring a run complete (a mismatch means rework, not a pass). - Ledger statuses ONLY:
ECC REAL INVOKED·ECC SKILL LOADED·NATIVE AGENT INVOKED·INTERNAL ROLE ONLY·NOT USED·FAILED·BLOCKED. Never label a native role as ECC; never claim a custom subagent/skill, a parallel agent, Codex, a screenshot or a dashboard that did not really run. - The dashboard is reported as running only if the Command Center health check (
GET http://127.0.0.1:4100/api/health) passed; never print a start/build command for the user to run. - Final verdict is ONE of FULL PASS · PASS CORE / PARTIAL PROOF · PARTIAL · BLOCKED · FAIL, plus the per-layer verdicts; no FULL PASS when a required Codex/browser proof was blocked; BLOCKED needs
node .claude/forge-bin/forge-recovery.cjs check-block <record.json>to reportok:true. - Section 15 is the
## Self-reviewsection (owner HARD MUST,docs/claude-md/end-self-review.md): print it withnode .claude/forge-bin/forge-endreview.cjs template --run <run_id>, answer every question with evidence or an open item, thennode .claude/forge-bin/forge-endreview.cjs record --run <run_id> --answers <answers.json>. On an L2+ run the contract ruleend-self-reviewwarns while it is missing; a report without it is not finished.
The FILE on disk keeps every section above in full. The CHAT reply stays short — see Section 0.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

