forge-prd
Skill2 starsChanged 6 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use before a non-trivial feature (schrijf een PRD, spec this out): PRD + tickets.
3 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- antonailog/forge-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- yike-gunshi/forge-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- ForgeyClap/claude-forgeedited, first seen Oct 11, 2026
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- ForgeyClap/claude-forge★ 258% same
Wrote their own version · 2
- antonailog/forge-skills★ 13same name
- yike-gunshi/forge-skills★ 13same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository99 other files it gives its agents.
- docs/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- brainstormingSkill
- claude-md-improverSkill
- dispatching-parallel-agentsSkill
- executing-plansSkill
- finishing-a-development-branchSkill
- forge-a11ySkill
- forge-agent-reportSkill
- forge-agentSkill
- forge-apiSkill
- forge-authSkill
- forge-autoresearchSkill
- forge-botsSkill
- forge-brainstormSkill
- forge-cliSkill
- forge-cmsSkill
- forge-code-reviewSkill
- forge-contextSkill
- forge-councilSkill
- forge-craftSkill
- forge-databaseSkill
- forge-dataSkill
- forge-debugSkill
- forge-deeplearnSkill
- forge-devopsSkill
- forge-docdriftSkill
- forge-doctorSkill
- forge-ecc-adapterSkill
- forge-ecommerceSkill
- forge-electronSkill
- forge-extensionSkill
- forge-figmaSkill
- forge-fullstackSkill
- forge-gameSkill
- forge-graded-verifySkill
- forge-guardianSkill
- forge-heartbeatSkill
- forge-i18n-docsSkill
- forge-intakeSkill
- forge-integrationSkill
- forge-long-form-writingSkill
- forge-mcp-clientsSkill
- forge-memorySkill
- forge-migrationSkill
- forge-mindmapSkill
- forge-mlopsSkill
- forge-mobileSkill
- forge-n8nSkill
- forge-nightshiftSkill
- forge-observabilitySkill
- forge-paymentsSkill
- forge-plan-largeSkill
- forge-predictionSkill
- forge-projectbrainSkill
- forge-prompt-coachSkill
- forge-qualitySkill
- forge-ragSkill
- forge-registrySkill
- forge-releaseSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
Before a non-trivial feature/build (new module, new integration, anything touching 3+ files) — not for a 1-2 line fix.
- Very specific: line 15
Not needed when the task is a small, well-understood change or a PRD for this exact scope already exists — check …
- Very specific: line 30
After delivery, user-facing release notes: references/release-notes.md.
- Distinctive: line 33
Real content only: Every section reflects an actual decision the Lead made — no placeholder/lorem sections, no invented acceptance criteria …
- Very specific: line 34
Secrets are auto-redacted: Every string in the PRD is redacted (forge-store.cjs's redactValue) before it is rendered to markdown or written …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Forge PRD generator (WP3)
A Forge PRD is a structured product-requirements document the Lead writes before a non-trivial build — it forces the scope, acceptance criteria, and test plan to be explicit before agents start touching files. It is rendered to markdown by .claude/forge-bin/forge-prd.cjs, a zero-dependency writer that stores both the markdown and its structured JSON meta under .claude/forge-prd/.
When the Lead generates one
- Before a non-trivial feature/build (new module, new integration, anything touching 3+ files) — not for a 1-2 line fix.
- Typically right after Deep Learn Mode (
forge-deeplearnskill) so the PRD's risks/architecture sections are grounded in the real codebase, not guesswork. - Too big for one session (several deliverables, open decisions): the owner charts it first with
forge-plan-large(owner-invoked), then one PRD per deliverable. - Not needed when the task is a small, well-understood change or a PRD for this exact scope already exists — check
.claude/forge-prd/index.jsonlfirst.
How (short)
The Lead writes the PRD content itself (real analysis, no filler) as JSON with prd_id, title, project and sections (goal … roadmap, plus acceptance_criteria entries {id, text, owner, required_tests}), then runs:
node .claude/forge-bin/forge-prd.cjs write '<prd-json>' --run <run_id> --tickets--ticketsauto-creates one ticket peracceptance_criteriaentry (.claude/forge-tickets/tk-<prd_id>-<n>,status: "open") — these feed the Ticket Board and the review gates the same as any other ticket.--run <run_id>logsprd_generated(and oneticket_createdper ticket) to that run's dashboard events. The JSON shape, the dry-runrendercommand and what gets written where:references/prd-format.md.
Writing the content
- Missing problem, users or success measure? Ask at most three short questions first; gaps the owner waves through become labelled assumptions in
risks, never facts. Lean by default (one to two pages); omit empty sections. Section-by-section guide and review mode:references/prd-writing.md. - Stories and testable acceptance criteria (user vs job stories, INVEST, splitting):
references/stories-and-criteria.md. - Scope too big for one version:
references/prioritization.md(opportunity score, ICE, RICE, MoSCoW). - After delivery, user-facing release notes:
references/release-notes.md.
Honesty rule (non-negotiable)
- Real content only. Every section reflects an actual decision the Lead made — no placeholder/lorem sections, no invented acceptance criteria just to pad the count.
- Secrets are auto-redacted. Every string in the PRD is redacted (
forge-store.cjs'sredactValue) before it is rendered to markdown or written to disk — never write a raw secret into a PRD. - The PRD viewer is read-only. There is no write endpoint on the dashboard for PRDs; the only way to create or change one is
forge-prd.cjs write(or hand-editing the store files, which the dashboard will simply reflect on next read).
References
references/prd-format.md— JSON shape, write/render commands, outputs.references/prd-writing.md— questions, section content, consistency checks, review mode.references/stories-and-criteria.md— story formats, acceptance criteria, INVEST, splitting patterns.references/prioritization.md— which prioritization method when, formulas, honesty rules.references/release-notes.md— categories, benefit-first entries, audience tone.- The four files above are adapted from phuryn/pm-skills (MIT); notice in
LICENSE.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

