Adelie-SquadAdelie-Squad/solosquad/skills/skill-refinement/SKILL.md

skill-refinement

Skill25 starsChanged 8 days agoMITView on GitHub

Skill 사용 후 개선 제안. ledger 분석으로 어느 skill 이 자주 실패 / open_question 다발 / 비효율인지 식별. Chief 가 retrospective 후 호출.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

krema/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026

Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
krema/agent-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository32 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- build-testSkill
- trend-trackerSkill
- typecheckSkill
- agent-managerSkill
- cron-managerSkill
- design-systemSkill
- discovery-synthesisSkill
- docsSkill
- experiment-designSkill
- goal-managerSkill
- hypothesis-designSkill
- interview-scriptSkill
- jobs-storiesSkill
- lean-canvasSkill
- market-researchSkill
- meceSkill
- okrSkill
- opportunity-treeSkill
- policySkill
- prdSkill
- premortemSkill
- primitive-reviewSkill
- prioritizationSkill
- retrospectiveSkill
- skill-managerSkill
- triageSkill
- wbsSkill
- workflow-managerSkill
- workflow-refinementSkill
- xyz-hypothesisSkill

The file

Create a free account to mount

Files

SKILL.md

Skill Refinement Skill

Chief 자가학습 루프의 일부. 어떤 skill 이 잘 작동하고, 어떤 skill 이 개선 필요한지 평가.

입력

평가 대상 period
<org>/memory/ledger/<task-id>.jsonl — skill 호출 trace
<org>/memory/open-questions/<id>.json — 미해결/blocking 비율
<org>/memory/agent-costs.jsonl — skill 별 cost

평가 차원

per_skill_metrics:
  skill_name: <name>
  invocation_count: <N>
  avg_duration_ms: <N>
  avg_cost_usd: <N>
  hard_gate_failure_rate: <%>      # gate 통과 못 한 비율
  open_question_rate: <%>           # 호출당 발생한 open_question 수
  rework_rate: <%>                  # 같은 task 에서 재호출된 비율
  confidence_delta_avg: <+/->       # 호출 전후 confidence 변화

Failure Patterns

patterns:
  - skill: problem-definition
    issue: "TDCC P4 단계 unknown 필드 too frequent (62%)"
    root_cause_hypothesis: "archive context 너무 짧음 (avg N=4 entries)"
    fix_candidates:
      - "기본 archive window 확대 (4→8 entries)"
      - "TDCC P4 reasoning step skip threshold 도입"

출력

period: "..."
top_3_high_friction_skills: [...]
top_3_efficient_skills: [...]
refinement_proposals:
  - skill: "..."
    proposal: "..."
    expected_impact: "..."
    effort: small | medium | large
    approval_required: founder | chief_auto

Anti-Sycophancy

❌ "skill 들이 잘 작동합니다"
✅ "problem-definition 의 P4 단계가 62% 빈도로 unknown 필드 발생. archive context 확대로 개선 가능 (예상 -30%)."

Reference

v1.1 PRD §5.2 RETROSPECT + §1.1 #7 (자가학습 메커니즘)

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

It worked
Partly
It didn't

What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

Check your setup, free