prioritization
Skill25 starsChanged 8 days agoMITView on GitHub
9 framework (RICE/ICE/Kano/Opportunity Score/MoSCoW/Weighted/Eisenhower/Value-vs-Effort/Cost-of-Delay) 비교 후 컨텍스트 맞춤 selection + 계산.
8 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- vijaysuperpositionist/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- zpower426/pmpowerstheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- The-Utopia-Studio/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- ysskrishna/ai-agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- nahid-sparktales/agent-dispatchertheir own version, first seen Sep 21, 2026
- sruthir28/enterprise-ai-skillstheir own version, first seen Apr 14, 2026
Other versions8 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 8
- sruthir28/enterprise-ai-skills★ 136same name
- nahid-sparktales/agent-dispatcher★ 59same name
- ysskrishna/ai-agent-skills★ 20same name
- The-Utopia-Studio/skills★ 6same name
- hajekim/agentic-design-patterns-skills★ 4same name
- hajekim/agentic-design-patterns-extension★ 1same name
- vijaysuperpositionist/skills★ 0same name
- zpower426/pmpowers★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository32 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- build-testSkill
- trend-trackerSkill
- typecheckSkill
- agent-managerSkill
- cron-managerSkill
- design-systemSkill
- discovery-synthesisSkill
- docsSkill
- experiment-designSkill
- goal-managerSkill
- hypothesis-designSkill
- interview-scriptSkill
- jobs-storiesSkill
- lean-canvasSkill
- market-researchSkill
- meceSkill
- okrSkill
- opportunity-treeSkill
- policySkill
- prdSkill
- premortemSkill
- primitive-reviewSkill
- retrospectiveSkill
- skill-managerSkill
- skill-refinementSkill
- triageSkill
- wbsSkill
- workflow-managerSkill
- workflow-refinementSkill
- xyz-hypothesisSkill
The file
Files
Prioritization Skill
9 Framework 매트릭스
| Framework | 형식 | 적용 컨텍스트 |
| RICE | (Reach × Impact × Confidence) / Effort | 분기 로드맵, 기능 우선순위 |
| ICE | (Impact + Confidence + Ease) / 3 | 빠른 직관 비교, ≤10 후보 |
| Kano | Must-have / Performance / Excitement / Indifferent / Reverse | 신규 기능 분류 |
| Opportunity Score | Importance × (1 - Satisfaction) | Discovery 단계, unmet need |
| MoSCoW | Must / Should / Could / Won't | Release 단위 분류 |
| Weighted | Σ (weight × score) | 다기준 의사결정 (technical + business) |
| Eisenhower | Urgent × Important 2×2 | Solo founder 일정 |
| Value vs Effort | 2×2 matrix | quick wins 식별 |
| Cost of Delay | $$ / week | 의존성 / 시간민감 작업 |
Framework 선택 가이드 (post-labeling)
PM 이 후보 framework 를 직접 처방하지 않고, 컨텍스트에서 어떤 분류가 자연스러운지 식별:
- 후보가 N≥20 → RICE
- 후보가 N≤10 + 빠른 비교 → ICE
- discovery 단계, unmet need 발굴 → Opportunity Score
- release scope 결정 → MoSCoW
- 신규 vs 기존 mix → Kano
- 시간 민감 / 의존성 → Cost of Delay
계산 예시 (RICE)
candidates:
- title: "feature A"
reach: 1000 # 분기 영향 사용자 수
impact: 2 # 0.25 / 0.5 / 1 / 2 / 3 scale
confidence: 0.7 # 0-1
effort: 2 # person-month
rice_score: 700 # (1000 * 2 * 0.7) / 2
- title: "feature B"
reach: 500
impact: 3
confidence: 0.5
effort: 1
rice_score: 750출력
{
"framework_used": "RICE",
"framework_rationale": "후보 23개 → RICE 적합",
"ranked": [
{ "id": "feature-B", "score": 750, "rank": 1 },
{ "id": "feature-A", "score": 700, "rank": 2 }
],
"recommended": ["feature-B"],
"deferred": ["feature-X"]
}Anti-Sycophancy
- ❌ "feature B 가 더 좋아 보입니다"
- ✅ "feature B 가 RICE 750 으로 1위. effort < 2 인 조건에서. effort 가 1.5 이상으로 재추정되면 feature A 가 1위로 역전."
Reference
- phuryn/pm-skills/pm-execution/prioritization-frameworks (9 framework)
- Intercom RICE framework
- Kano model
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

