writing-plans
Skill0 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when you have specs or requirements for a multi-step PM task, before starting execution. Used to develop detailed plans for research, experimentation, definition, and verification.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 169 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 18
Analyze Spec: Ensure full understanding of the logic in docs/pmpowers/specs/.
- Distinctive: line 24
Save Plan: Write to the temporary plan directory and execute after approval.
- Distinctive: line 28
Every task in the plan must be linked to the North Star Metric.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 169 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Writing Plans: PM Action Planning Guide
Transform approved designs into a series of verifiable, traceable tasks.
Core Mandates
- Don't Skip Verification: Any plan that includes "implementation" must first include "verification."
- Atomic Tasks: Each task should have a single output (e.g., an interview outline, a metric definition).
- User Review: You must have the user confirm the plan before starting task execution.
Checklist
- Analyze Spec: Ensure full understanding of the logic in
docs/pmpowers/specs/. - Develop Phased Tasks:
- Phase 1: Discovery/Validation: De-risking.
- Phase 2: Definition: Detailed logic.
- Phase 3: Final Guard: End-to-end verification.
- Set Checkpoints: Pause at critical decision points to get user feedback.
- Save Plan: Write to the temporary plan directory and execute after approval.
Verification & Traceability
Every task in the plan must be linked to the North Star Metric. If a task cannot explain how it improves the core metric, it is waste.
Other versions187 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 187
- obra/superpowers★ 305ksame name
- jnMetaCode/superpowers-zh★ 8.4ksame name
- openai/plugins★ 7.4ksame name
- farm-fe/farm★ 5.6ksame name
- microsoft/FluidFramework★ 5ksame name
- revokslab/ShipFree★ 1.7ksame name
- GanyuanRan/Aegis★ 1.4ksame name
- pcvelz/superpowers★ 1.3ksame name
- math-inc/OpenGauss★ 1.3ksame name
- coco-research/coco★ 797same name
177 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use chinese-code-review, chinese-commit-conventions and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
GEd520Skillchinese-code-review
中文 review 沟通参考——话术模板、分级标注(必须修复/建议修改/仅供参考)、国内团队常见反模式应对。仅在用户显式 /chinese-code-review 时调用,不要根据上下文自动触发。
Also in 7 projects that use this
GEd520Skillchinese-commit-conventions
中文 commit 与 changelog 配置参考——Conventional Commits 中文适配、commitlint/husky/commitizen 中文模板、conventional-changelog 中文配置。仅在用户显式 /chinese-commit-conventions 时调用,不要根据上下文自动触发。
Also in 7 projects that use this
ryanportfolioSkilladdskill
Create, import, update, or install repo or personal skills: runtime ownership, resources, discovery checks.
Also in 5 projects that use this
ryanportfolioSkillastra-fullreview
Full multi-agent Codex review on gpt-6-astra, medium. Same lifecycle as codex-fullreview. Use: /astra-fullreview, 'full Astra review with sub-reviewers'.
Also in 5 projects that use this
- +2 more from GEd520
- +6 more from ryanportfolio
In this repository34 other files it gives its agents.
- agile-scrum-masterySkill
- artifact-provenanceSkill
- brainstormingSkill
- business-acumenSkill
- cross-functional-collaborationSkill
- customer-discoverySkill
- customer-empathySkill
- data-analysisSkill
- gtm-launch-managementSkill
- lean-experimentationSkill
- market-researchSkill
- metrics-definitionSkill
- negotiation-conflict-resolutionSkill
- north-star-metricSkill
- opportunity-mappingSkill
- outcome-ownershipSkill
- presentation-storytellingSkill
- prioritizationSkill
- problem-solvingSkill
- product-definitionSkill
- product-vision-strategySkill
- project-managementSkill
- prototypingSkill
- qa-quality-mindsetSkill
- roadmappingSkill
- spec-driven-designSkill
- stakeholder-managementSkill
- subagent-driven-discoverySkill
- technical-acumenSkill
- user-interviewingSkill
- using-pmpowersSkill
- ux-design-awarenessSkill
- validation-guardSkill
- written-communicationSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

