agentleFS
zjunlpzjunlp/Mechanist/skills/mhistory/SKILL.md

mhistory

Skill75 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Generate a structured, publication-quality research-history markdown article for a given topic. Uses the cloud `mechanic_database` SEARCH service via skill `/mechanic-db-search` (TWO PARALLEL passes — `temporal_mode=history` for the long arc + `temporal_mode=recent` for the frontier), then supplements with WebSearch for pre-DB classics and the last 1–6 months of arXiv work. Triggers: 'research history', 'development history', 'survey of X', 'trace the evolution of …'.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Graceful degradation: If /mechanic-db-search does not work properly, both DB passes silently skip (the search_papers tool writes {"papers": …

    line 22
  2. Very specific:

    Ensure the output dirs exist: mkdir -p mechanic_db_cache.

    line 50
  3. Very specific:

    Use the WebSearch tool. Fire 2–4 queries per purpose:

    line 77
  4. Distinctive:

    If the topic is cross-domain, run one query per sub-domain.

    line 87
  5. Distinctive:

    Write the article in this session.

    line 95
  6. Very specific:

    Write the result to development_history.md.

    line 140

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Research Development-History Generator

Produce a fact-grounded, chronologically clear, classics-plus-frontier development-history article for a given research direction.

When to trigger

  • The user asks for "a development history of X", "trace the evolution of X", "how X got to where it is today", or an equivalent request phrased in another language.
  • The user explicitly invokes /mhistory <topic>.

Core principles

  1. Retrieval goes through the cloud SEARCH service via the /mechanic-db-search skill. The Agent submits an English query per pass; the service then return a paper list.
  2. Two-track retrieval, run in parallel: launch /mechanic-db-search twice at the same time — once with temporal_mode=history (5-year buckets, even coverage across eras) and once with temporal_mode=recent (recency-boosted, modern frontier).
  3. Web supplementation with WebSearch, for two purposes:
    • history gap-fill: the DB may miss some foundational work.
    • Frontier gap-fill: DB indexing lags; arXiv work from the last 1–6 months is usually absent.
  4. Graceful degradation: If /mechanic-db-search does not work properly, both DB passes silently skip (the search_papers tool writes {"papers": [], "skipped": true} to each output) — the article is then built from WebSearch + Claude's own knowledge, and the final markdown explicitly notes "mechanic-db unavailable".

Pipeline

   topic (free-form text from user)
        │
        ├──┬──► [1a] /mechanic-db-search  (temporal_mode=history, top_k=100)  ┐
        │  │                                                                       ├─ launched in parallel
        │  └──► [1b] /mechanic-db-search  (temporal_mode=recent,     top_k=100)  ┘
        │        → two cached final-JSON files
        │
        ├──► [2] WebSearch × N
        │        - history gap-fill ("<topic> seminal paper", "<topic> foundational work pre-2018", …)
        │        - Last-1–6-months gap-fill ("<topic> arxiv 2026", "<topic> latest", …)
        │
        └──► [3] Claude (this session) synthesises markdown and writes it to disk

Steps

Step 0 — Parse topic, derive slug

  • Extract <topic> from the user's request (free text, Chinese or English).
  • Compute a deterministic slug from the topic (ASCII-lowercase, spaces → _, strip punctuation). Pure bash works:
    SLUG=$(echo "<topic>" | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]' | tr -c 'a-z0-9' '_' | sed -E 's/_+/_/g; s/^_+|_+$//g')
  • Ensure the output dirs exist: mkdir -p mechanic_db_cache.

Step 1 — Two parallel mechanic-db passes

Craft one polished English query that names the topic + key sub-fields (≤80 words). The same query string is used for both passes; only temporal_mode differs.

Retrieval goes through the search_papers MCP tool (mechanic-db server) — see /mechanic-db-search for the full contract. Issue both passes as two parallel tool calls in a single turn (the tool blocks ~3-20 min each; running them concurrently halves the wait). Each call writes its full result JSON to an absolute output path (run pwd once to get <ABS_PWD>):

# Pass 1a — history arc
search_papers:
  output:        <ABS_PWD>/mechanic_db_cache/<SLUG>__hist.json
  query:         <the polished English query>
  temporal_mode: history
  top_k:         100

# Pass 1b — recent frontier
search_papers:
  output:        <ABS_PWD>/mechanic_db_cache/<SLUG>__recent.json
  query:         <the polished English query>
  temporal_mode: recent
  top_k:         100

Step 2 — WebSearch supplementation

Use the WebSearch tool. Fire 2–4 queries per purpose:

history gap-fill (find canonical references, anchor the timeline)

  • "<topic>" seminal foundational paper before 2020
  • "<topic>" history review survey
  • For NLP/ML topics, append site:arxiv.org or site:aclanthology.org.

Last-1–6-months gap-fill (cover the DB's indexing blind spot)

  • "<topic>" arxiv 2026 / current year
  • "<topic>" latest 2025 2026
  • If the topic is cross-domain, run one query per sub-domain.

Assemble the returned (title / authors / year / URL / snippet) into a short markdown block in context — no need to write it to disk.

If WebSearch fails or is unavailable, skip this step and rely on DB retrieval + Claude's own knowledge. But the final markdown must explicitly state "WebSearch unavailable".

Step 3 — Synthesise the markdown

Write the article in this session. Material preparation:

  1. Load the two cached final-JSON files. Skip any that have "skipped": true. Merge the surviving papers lists, dedupe by paper_id. Keep every paper's title / year / cited_by_count / abstract / doi / authors.
  2. Organise the WebSearch results (title / authors / year / URL / snippet) into a parallel list, tagged as [Web].
  3. Internalise the writing brief below — it is the core authoring instruction of this skill, not optional flavour text.

Persona. You are a senior research scholar writing a thorough development-history article for a research community. You combine your own broad knowledge of the literature with the curated set of supplementary papers the user has provided. Your output is rigorous, chronologically organised, and cites specific paper titles only when supported.

How to use the supplementary paper bundle. The bundle (DB + Web) is supplementary, not authoritative:

  • It is generated by a retrieval pipeline that may have missed relevant papers. There will be canonical works absent from the bundle that you must add from your own knowledge.
  • It may include borderline / peripheral papers that aren't truly central. Use your judgement — cite a paper from the bundle only when it actually deserves to be cited.
  • The bundle gives you exact titles, authors, years, DOI / arXiv URLs you can quote verbatim. Whenever you would otherwise paraphrase a citation, prefer the bundle's exact form.
  • Treat [Web]-tagged entries as part of the same bundle, but track their origin in the citation list.

Required structure. Organise the article by chronological eras or thematic phases (your choice; pick whichever best captures the field). Within each era / phase:

  • Trace the evolution of ideas: what problem was being solved, what breakthrough enabled the next phase, what limitation forced researchers to a new approach.
  • Cite specific papers with title (first-author surname, year). When citing from the bundle, prefer the bundle's exact title.
  • Include both classical foundations (pre-2020 if applicable) and 2024–2026 frontier work.
  • If the topic has multiple research lines, cover them in parallel; do not collapse everything into a single narrative thread.

Anti-patterns to AVOID.

  • Listing only papers from the bundle — your own knowledge of the field must drive the narrative; the bundle just supplies citation precision.
  • Over-relying on the bundle's most-cited papers — recency and conceptual novelty matter as much as citation count.
  • Inventing paper titles. If you're unsure of a title, paraphrase the contribution and omit the citation.
  • Generic survey-style writing. Be specific about what each paper showed, not just that it exists.

Output format.

  • Markdown. Use # / ## / ### for structure.
  • Target length 2500–4500 words.
  • End with a "Tensions and Open Questions" section covering live debates and unresolved problems in this area as of 2025–2026.
  • Suggested skeleton (adapt freely as long as the above requirements hold):
    # <topic>
    ## TL;DR
    ## history arc (organised by era / thematic phase)
    ## Contemporary landscape (2023–2025)
    ## Frontier (last 1–6 months — mark each item as [DB] or [Web])
    ## Tensions and Open Questions
    ## References ([DB] and [Web] sections, with DOI / arXiv URL)

  1. Write the result to development_history.md.
  2. Print a short terminal summary: # of DB papers used (or "DB unavailable" per pass), # of Web supplements, final markdown word count, output path.

Input / output contract

Input: a free-text topic (Chinese or English), optional slug.

Output files:

  • mechanic_db_cache/<slug>__hist.json (cached cloud-service result for the history pass; may be {"skipped": true})
  • mechanic_db_cache/<slug>__recent.json (cached cloud-service result for the recent pass; may be {"skipped": true})
  • development_history.md ← the deliverable

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.