experiment-queue
Skill75 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
SSH job queue for multi-seed / multi-config ML experiments with OOM-aware retry, stale-screen cleanup, wave-transition race prevention, and phase-dependency enforcement. Use when user says "batch experiments", "queue experiments", "run grid", "multi-seed sweep", "auto-chain experiments", or when `/run-experiment` is insufficient for ≥10 jobs that need orchestration. `/auto-experiment` Phase 4 auto-routes here when a milestone declares ≥10 jobs or has `depends_on`.
3 other projects use a version of this, 3 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- talhaMah56/claude_skillsedited, first seen Sep 12, 2026
- wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleepedited, first seen Jul 15, 2026
- raja21068/AutoResearchedited, first seen May 5, 2026
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 3
- wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep★ 19k63% same
- raja21068/AutoResearch★ 283% same
- talhaMah56/claude_skills★ 063% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository52 other files it gives its agents.
- ablation-plannerSkill
- analyze-resultsSkill
- arxivSkill
- auto-claimSkill
- auto-experimentSkill
- auto-iteration-loopSkill
- autoSkill
- verify-pick-alternativesSkill
- auto-verifySkill
- data-ruleSkill
- experiment-auditSkill
- experiment-planSkill
- finetune-hyperparameter-sweepSkill
- imageSkill
- multiple-choice-evaluationSkill
- experiment-tipsSkill
- steering-block-selectionSkill
- steering-coefficient-tuningSkill
- hypothesis-batchSkill
- idea-creatorSkill
- impact-checkSkill
- mechanic-db-searchSkill
- mechanism-auditSkill
- mechanism-behavior-discoverySkill
- mechanism-exploreSkill
- causal-attributionSkill
- CircuitSkill
- Feature Dictionary LearningSkill
- gradient-detectionSkill
- Magnitude AnalysisSkill
- Multi-Modal InterpretabilitySkill
- Neural Feature LearningSkill
- ProbingSkill
- Representation and Parameter AnalysisSkill
- SHAPSkill
- mechanism-skillsSkill
- Vocabulary ProjectionSkill
- mguideSkill
- mhistorySkill
- monitor-experimentSkill
- msearchSkill
- next-roundSkill
- notifySkill
- novelty-checkSkill
- paper-figureSkill
- research-litSkill
- research-refine-pipelineSkill
- research-refineSkill
- research-reviewSkill
- result-to-claimSkill
- run-experimentSkill
- training-checkSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
25 rules. 12 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 12 are very specific to this project.
12
Common
Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
12
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 14
Use when /run-experiment is insufficient:
- Common: line 22
Do NOT use for:
- Very specific: line 37
All of these are pure engineering friction that can be orchestrated.
- Common: line 90
All current-wave python processes have exited
- Common: line 91
No stale screens remain for current-wave tags
- Very specific: line 127
When invoked from /auto-experiment Phase 4 (auto-routed), the caller forwards the milestone's run list plus a derived phases: block (one …
- Common: line 131
Check SSH connection works
- Common: line 132
Check conda env exists on remote
- Very specific: line 133
Check cwd exists on remote
- Common: line 134
Check all preconditions (checkpoints, input files)
- Very specific: line 135
Check GPU availability (at least max_parallel free GPUs)
- Common: line 137
If any precondition fails, show user which jobs are blocked and why.
- Distinctive: line 150
Do not resolve these helpers from the user's current project directory.
- Very specific: line 152
3b. Compute remote paths: Use both a remote-relative form (for scp destinations — modern scp runs in SFTP mode and does NOT reliably expand …
- Very specific: line 224
When all jobs in manifest.json are completed or stuck:
- Common: line 232
Instead of writing 24 job entries manually:
- Common: line 283
Check if current GPU is free.
- Common: line 289
Every 60s, for each running screen:
- Very specific: line 290
Check screen exists (screen -ls)
- Very specific: line 291
Check python PID still running (ps -p)
- Common: line 292
If screen exists but python exited:
- Very specific: line 293
If expected output file exists → mark completed, kill stale screen
- Very specific: line 294
If no output file → mark failed_other, kill screen
- Common: line 298
If scheduler crashes / is killed:
- Very specific: line 345
Rule: Use /run-experiment for ≤5 jobs.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Experiment Queue
Orchestrate large batches of ML experiments on SSH remote GPU servers with proper state tracking, OOM retry, stale-screen cleanup, wave transitions, and phase-dependency enforcement.
When to Use This Skill
Use when /run-experiment is insufficient:
- ≥10 jobs that need batching across GPUs
- Multi-seed sweeps (e.g., 21 seeds × 12 cells)
- Wave transitions (run wave 1, wait, run wave 2, wait, run wave 3...)
- Teacher+student chains (train teacher, then distill; auto-trigger student after teacher done)
- OOM-prone configs where you need to retry with different GPU or wait
- Mixed seed grids where failed cells need re-running
Do NOT use for:
- Single ad-hoc experiment (use
/run-experiment) - Modal / Vast.ai deployments (those have their own orchestration)
- Experiments that need manual inspection between runs
Why This Exists
The major wall-clock sinks in multi-seed grid experiments are:
- Stale screens — python finishes, wandb uploads, screen hangs, next wave blocked
- OOM on shared GPU — previous job's memory not yet released
- Wave race — new wave launches before previous wave fully settles
- Missing checkpoints — student launches before teacher saved
- Parser duplication — rewriting multi-seed analysis python every batch
All of these are pure engineering friction that can be orchestrated. /run-experiment + /monitor-experiment cover ad-hoc single runs but lack OOM retry, displacement-aware GPU gating, wave settlement, and crash-safe state — at ≥10 concurrent jobs these gaps start firing.
Core Concepts
Job Manifest
A manifest lists jobs with explicit state:
project: my_grid_experiment
cwd: /home/user/your_project
conda: my_env
# Optional: override conda hook path if conda is not at a standard location.
# Can be a bare path (wrapped automatically) or a full `eval "$(... shell.bash hook)"` string.
# Falls back to auto-detect of ~/anaconda3, ~/miniconda3, /opt/anaconda3, etc.,
# or the MECHANIST_CONDA_HOOK environment variable.
# conda_hook: /custom/path/to/conda
ssh: gpu-server
default_cmd: >
python run_distill.py --backbone softmax --lam 0.5
--K 500 --L 96 --W 16 --n_steps 30000 --batch_size 128 --lr 1e-4
preconditions:
- type: checkpoint_exists
path: checkpoints/transformer/teacher_L96_K500_N{N}.pt
gpus: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]
max_parallel: 8
gpu_free_threshold_mib: 500 # optional, default 500; raise for shared servers, lower for tight packing
oom_retry:
delay: 120
max_attempts: 3
jobs:
- id: s200_N64_n50K
args: {seed: 200, n_hidden: 64, n_train_subset: 50000, subset_seed: 2024}
- id: s200_N128_n50K
args: {seed: 200, n_hidden: 128, n_train_subset: 50000, subset_seed: 2024}
# ... 14 moreJob State Machine
pending → running → completed
↘ failed_oom → pending (after delay) [retry up to N]
↘ failed_other → stuck (needs manual inspection)
stale_screen_detected → cleaned → pendingWave Orchestration
A "wave" is a batch of jobs that fit available GPUs. Next wave only starts when:
- All current-wave python processes have exited
- No stale screens remain for current-wave tags
- GPU memory has dropped below threshold (≤500 MiB)
- Precondition checks pass for next-wave jobs
Coordination with cost.json and queue_state.json
MECHANIST has two parallel state files at different granularities:
| File | Granularity | Writer | Consumers |
runs/<run-id>/cost.json | Per-run (1 file per logical experiment run) | /run-experiment Step 5.5 (initial stub) + /monitor-experiment Step 3.6 (finalize) | /auto-experiment Phase 5, /auto-iteration-loop Phase C, /auto-verify budget tracking |
$REMOTE_RUN_DIR/queue_state.json | Per-batch (1 file per /experiment-queue invocation, covering all jobs in the batch) | bundled queue_manager.py copied from this skill's scripts/ directory — updated every poll cycle | This skill's monitoring (Step 4), Phase-4 batch-level diagnostics in /auto-experiment |
They are complementary, not redundant: queue_state.json is the source of truth for "which jobs in this batch are still running / OOM-retrying / stuck"; cost.json is the source of truth for "how many GPU-hours did this individual run consume." When /experiment-queue finishes a job (state machine transitions running → completed), its expected_output is verified — at that point the caller of /experiment-queue (typically /auto-experiment Phase 4) should invoke /monitor-experiment on each completed job to finalize that run's cost.json. Do not duplicate cost accounting inside queue_state.json — keep the two files at their respective granularities.
Workflow
Step 1: Parse Manifest / Build from Grid
Input can be:
- YAML manifest (explicit job list, recommended for complex cases)
- Grid spec (Cartesian product of param values, e.g.,
N=[64,128,256] × n=[50K,150K,500K,652K]) - Natural language description (Claude parses into manifest)
Bind the run identifiers once so every later step (manifest save, scp, launch, monitor, resume) refers to the same paths. Set these as local shell variables before generating the manifest:
# REPLACE the placeholder path before running, or pre-export PROJECT_DIR:
PROJECT_DIR="${PROJECT_DIR:?set PROJECT_DIR to the local project root}"
RUN_TS=$(date -u +%Y%m%dT%H%M%SZ) # one timestamp per run, reused everywhere
LOCAL_RUN_DIR="$PROJECT_DIR/experiment_queue/$RUN_TS"
mkdir -p "$LOCAL_RUN_DIR"Save the built manifest to $LOCAL_RUN_DIR/manifest.json for reproducibility.
When invoked from /auto-experiment Phase 4 (auto-routed), the caller forwards the milestone's run list plus a derived phases: block (one phase per milestone, with depends_on: populated from EXPERIMENT_PLAN.md's declared dependencies); this skill does not re-parse the plan.
Step 2: Pre-flight
- Check SSH connection works
- Check conda env exists on remote
- Check
cwdexists on remote - Check all preconditions (checkpoints, input files)
- Check GPU availability (at least
max_parallelfree GPUs)
If any precondition fails, show user which jobs are blocked and why.
Step 3: Launch Scheduler
The scheduler implementation lives in this skill's scripts/queue_manager.py. Three preliminaries before launch.
3a. Resolve the local helper directory. The two helpers (queue_manager.py, build_manifest.py) sit under scripts/ next to this SKILL.md:
QUEUE_TOOLS="${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts"
[ -f "$QUEUE_TOOLS/queue_manager.py" ] || { echo "ERROR: experiment_queue helpers not found under \$CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR/scripts" >&2; exit 1; }Do not resolve these helpers from the user's current project directory; pluginized skills should use their own bundled scripts.
3b. Compute remote paths. Use both a remote-relative form (for scp destinations — modern scp runs in SFTP mode and does NOT reliably expand $HOME in destination paths) and a $HOME-prefixed form (for ssh ... command strings, where remote bash WILL expand $HOME):
REMOTE_RUN_REL=".mechanist_queue/runs/$RUN_TS" # for scp destinations (relative to remote home)
REMOTE_RUN_DIR="\$HOME/$REMOTE_RUN_REL" # for ssh command strings (literal $HOME, expanded on remote)3c. Bootstrap the remote run directory and copy helpers + manifest. Per-invocation and idempotent. Use a unique run directory rather than /tmp so concurrent queues do not collide and so resume-after-crash is reproducible.
ssh <server> "mkdir -p \"$REMOTE_RUN_DIR/logs\" \"\$HOME/.mechanist_queue\""
scp "$QUEUE_TOOLS/queue_manager.py" "$QUEUE_TOOLS/build_manifest.py" <server>:.mechanist_queue/
scp "$LOCAL_RUN_DIR/manifest.json" <server>:"$REMOTE_RUN_REL/manifest.json"3d. Launch the scheduler as a detached nohup process on the SSH host:
ssh <server> "nohup python3 \"\$HOME/.mechanist_queue/queue_manager.py\" \\
--manifest \"$REMOTE_RUN_DIR/manifest.json\" \\
--state \"$REMOTE_RUN_DIR/queue_state.json\" \\
--log-dir \"$REMOTE_RUN_DIR/logs\" \\
> \"$REMOTE_RUN_DIR/queue_mgr.log\" 2>&1 &"Notes for callers:
--log-diris whatqueue_manager.pyactually consumes (per-job log files for OOM detection). Do NOT pass--log <path>— that flag is declared but unused, and a single combined log breaks the per-job stale-screen / OOM heuristics.Persist
RUN_TS/REMOTE_RUN_REL/REMOTE_RUN_DIRto disk so monitoring and resume can reload them without regenerating:{ printf 'PROJECT_DIR=%q\n' "$PROJECT_DIR" printf 'RUN_TS=%q\n' "$RUN_TS" printf 'LOCAL_RUN_DIR=%q\n' "$LOCAL_RUN_DIR" printf 'REMOTE_RUN_REL=%q\n' "$REMOTE_RUN_REL" printf 'REMOTE_RUN_DIR=%q\n' "$REMOTE_RUN_DIR" } > "$LOCAL_RUN_DIR/run_meta.txt"%qshell-escapes the values so the file is safely sourceable later. Note thatREMOTE_RUN_DIRkeeps a literal$HOME(do not expand it locally), which is the right form for re-use insidessh "..."strings later.
3e. Resume an existing queue (only when the user asks). A fresh RUN_TS per invocation is correct for new queues. To resume a crashed queue, do NOT regenerate RUN_TS — reload the recorded values and re-run only the launch command (Step 3d), not the bootstrap (Step 3c):
LOCAL_RUN_DIR="/abs/path/to/project/experiment_queue/<existing-run-ts>" # the run dir to resume
. "$LOCAL_RUN_DIR/run_meta.txt" # reloads PROJECT_DIR / RUN_TS / REMOTE_RUN_REL / REMOTE_RUN_DIR
# Then re-run Step 3d verbatim. Do NOT re-run Step 3c (would overwrite manifest.json + state.json).The scheduler:
- Reads manifest
- Loops: for each pending job, assign to free GPU, launch via
screen - Polls job status (every 60s)
- Detects stale screens (python exited but screen detached → kill)
- Detects OOM (CUDA OOM in log → mark failed_oom → retry after delay)
- Detects completion (expected output JSON/file exists) → mark completed
- Launches next wave when current wave settles
- Writes state to
queue_state.jsoncontinuously
Step 4: Monitoring
User can check state anytime, using $REMOTE_RUN_DIR from Step 3b (or reload from $LOCAL_RUN_DIR/run_meta.txt for an older run):
ssh <server> "cat \"$REMOTE_RUN_DIR/queue_state.json\"" \
| jq '.jobs | group_by(.status) | map({(.[0].status): length}) | add'Note: /monitor-experiment is focused on per-run screen sessions, result JSONs, W&B, and the cost.json finalization (Step 3.6 there). For batch-level queue-state monitoring, use the literal jq command above against the recorded REMOTE_RUN_DIR. The two views are complementary — see the "Coordination with cost.json and queue_state.json" section above.
Step 5: Post-completion
When all jobs in manifest.json are completed or stuck:
- The remote scheduler (
queue_manager.py) exits cleanly withAll jobs doneto its own stdout (captured in$REMOTE_RUN_DIR/queue_mgr.log). It does NOT write the local summary. - The local skill agent then aggregates state into
$LOCAL_RUN_DIR/summary.md(read$REMOTE_RUN_DIR/queue_state.json, group by status, optionally pull per-job logs). - The local skill agent invokes
/monitor-experimenton eachcompletedjob to finalize itsruns/<job-id>/cost.json(so downstream consumers can read GPU-hours from the canonical place). - Local skill agent invokes
/analyze-resultsifanalyze_on_complete: true.
Grid Spec Syntax
Instead of writing 24 job entries manually:
grid:
N: [64, 128, 256]
n: [50000, 150000, 500000, 652000]
seed: [42, 200, 201]
template:
id: "s${seed}_N${N}_n${n}"
args: {seed: ${seed}, n_hidden: ${N}, n_train_subset: ${n}}Expands to 36 jobs automatically.
Wave Chaining
For sequential phases (teacher → student):
phases:
- name: train_teachers
grid:
N: [384, 512]
template:
cmd: python run_train.py --direction c --backbone softmax --n_hidden ${N} ...
output_check: checkpoints/transformer/teacher_L96_K500_N${N}.pt
- name: distill_students
depends_on: train_teachers
grid:
N: [384, 512]
seed: [42, 200, 201]
template:
cmd: python run_distill.py --n_hidden ${N} --seed ${seed} ...
output_check: figures/distill_sw_N${N}_*_seed${seed}.jsonScheduler enforces depends_on: distill_students jobs stay pending until all
train_teachers jobs are completed.
OOM Handling
Detect OOM from stdout:
torch\.OutOfMemoryError: CUDA out of memoryOn detection:
- Mark job
failed_oom - Kill screen
- Wait
oom_retry.delayseconds - Check if current GPU is free; if not, try another free GPU
- Requeue as
pending - Max
oom_retry.max_attemptsbefore markingstuck
Stale Screen Detection
Every 60s, for each running screen:
- Check screen exists (
screen -ls) - Check python PID still running (
ps -p) - If screen exists but python exited:
- If expected output file exists → mark
completed, kill stale screen - If no output file → mark
failed_other, kill screen
- If expected output file exists → mark
Resume-on-restart
If scheduler crashes / is killed:
- Read
queue_state.json - For each
runningjob: check screen; if still alive, keep; if not, re-evaluate state - For each
pending: continue normally - Idempotent: safe to restart scheduler without losing state
Output: Summary Report
# Experiment Queue Summary
**Project**: my_grid_experiment
**Started**: 2026-05-18 11:36:29
**Completed**: 2026-05-18 18:02:14
**Total wall-clock**: 6h 25m
**Jobs**: 40 completed, 2 OOM-retried then completed, 0 stuck
## Phases
| Phase | Jobs | Success | OOM retries | Duration |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| train_teachers | 2 | 2 | 0 | 58m |
| distill_students | 24 | 24 | 2 | 4h 02m |
| multi_seed_validation | 16 | 16 | 0 | 1h 25m |
## Results Files
- 42 JSON files in `figures/distill_sw_*.json`
- 42 cost manifests in `runs/<job-id>/cost.json` (finalized via `/monitor-experiment` Step 3.6)
## Next Steps
- Run `/analyze-results` on output JSONs
- Caller (`/auto-experiment` Phase 5) aggregates per-run cost manifests into the milestone summaryComparison with /run-experiment
| Feature | /run-experiment | experiment-queue |
| Single-shot experiment | ✅ | ✅ (overkill) |
| Multi-GPU parallel | Basic | Proper scheduling |
| Wave transitions | Manual | Automatic |
| OOM retry | Manual | Automatic |
| Stale screen cleanup | Manual | Automatic |
| Teacher→student chain | Manual | Built-in |
| State persistence | cost.json per-run only | queue_state.json per-batch + per-run cost.json |
| Resume on crash | Per-run only (no batch state) | Yes, batch-level |
| Grid expansion | Manual | Declarative |
Rule: Use /run-experiment for ≤5 jobs. Use experiment-queue for ≥10 jobs or any milestone with depends_on. /auto-experiment Phase 4 auto-routes based on this rule — see its "Phase 4: Deploy Full Experiments" section.
Key Rules
- Never overlap screens on the same GPU — always wait for
memory.used < 500 MiBbefore launching new job - Always write state to disk — every state change flushed to
queue_state.jsonatomically (write tmp + rename) - Idempotent scheduler — safe to restart; picks up from state file
- Expected-output-based completion — don't trust screen state alone; verify output file exists
- Bounded retry — max N OOM retries, then mark
stuckand alert - Dependencies enforced at launch — never launch student before teacher checkpoint exists
cost.jsonfinalization is the caller's job — this skill writes batch state; per-run cost manifests are finalized by/monitor-experimentStep 3.6, invoked by the caller after batch completion
Known Failure Modes
- SSH connection drop during scheduling: scheduler keeps running on remote (nohup), just reconnect and check
- GPU reservation by another user: scheduler waits, does not pre-empt
- Disk full on remote: scheduler detects write failure, marks all pending
stuck, alerts
Example Session
User: "Run all T5+T6 experiments: T5 = N∈{80,192} × n 4 values × seed {200,201}, T6 = N∈{384,512} × n 4 values × seed {42,200,201}; T6 needs its teacher trained first"
Claude invokes /experiment-queue:
- Parses description into 2-phase manifest
- Phase 1: T5 (16 jobs, no teacher dependency) + T6 teacher training (2 jobs)
- Phase 2: T6 distillation (24 jobs, depends on teachers)
- Deploys scheduler via nohup
- Reports: "Scheduler PID 93534, total 42 jobs, estimated 6-7h wall-clock"
Then user can check anytime or wait for summary report.
See Also
/run-experiment— single experiment deployment; writes per-runcost.jsonstub/monitor-experiment— per-run progress check + finalizescost.json/auto-experimentPhase 4 — auto-routes to this skill when a milestone declares ≥10 jobs or hasdepends_onskills/experiment-queue/scripts/queue_manager.py(bundled) — the scheduler implementation; resolved at runtime via$CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR/scriptsskills/experiment-queue/scripts/build_manifest.py(bundled) — build manifest from grid spec; same resolution
Rationale / Source
Adapted from an upstream experiment-queue skill (originally identified via a 2026-04-16 post-mortem of a 1.5-day multi-seed paper experiment session). The wall-clock sinks identified there — stale screens, OOM, wave transitions, manual parser — all apply identically to MECHANIST's experiment stage when run sizes exceed /run-experiment's single-shot scope. The Python helpers (queue_manager.py, build_manifest.py) are a direct port with environment-variable renames and cost.json coordination added.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

