agentleFS
runxhqrunxhq/runx/skills/twitter/SKILL.md

twitter

Skill97 starsChanged 32 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Govern X (Twitter) account work through three lanes: evidence reads, typed act plans for posting and account hygiene, and gated execution with per-act provider evidence. Nothing reaches a live timeline or mutates an account without an explicit approval recorded in the receipt.

15 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use nano-banana-pro and github.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • szweibelSkill

    nano-banana-pro

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • NVIDIASkill

    github

    Interact with GitHub using the gh CLI restricted to REST API only (no GraphQL). Use when the user wants to work with GitHub issues, pull requests, repos, releases, or Actions — especially in sandboxed environments where the GraphQL endpoint may be blocked. Trigger keywords - github, gh, pull request, PR, github issue, github actions, workflow, release, gh api.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 12 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Write for the operator who owns the account, the reviewer who approves a live act, and downstream skills that consume the resulting packets.

    line 21
  2. Very specific:

    Every kind is consequential, so every plan sets gates.human_approval_required: true.

    line 129
  3. Very specific:

    Write public content into the act params verbatim: the exact text or texts to publish, shaped by brand_context when supplied.

    line 179
  4. Distinctive:

    Keep the plan small: at most 50 acts, at most 10 engagement acts, threads at most 25 segments.

    line 188
  5. Distinctive:

    Never place credentials, bearer tokens, raw API dumps, or third-party personal data beyond public ids and handles in the plan.

    line 193
  6. Very specific:

    Follow the plan procedure and act vocabulary above.

    line 313

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 12 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Twitter

One account, three lanes: read evidence, plan typed acts, execute an approved plan.

This is the public branded X (Twitter) catalog skill for the send-as action family. Its core invariant: the agent may read, audit, draft, and plan freely, but every act that publishes to a public timeline or mutates the account stops at a human approval gate, and the sealed receipt proves which acts ran, against which plan digest, with which provider evidence.

Write for the operator who owns the account, the reviewer who approves a live act, and downstream skills that consume the resulting packets. Keep each plan to the smallest evidence-backed act set that satisfies the objective. Existing post and user ids must come from supplied evidence, never memory or guesswork; name missing evidence as a blocker.

Composes

<!-- Generated from the native execution closure; run pnpm core-skills:composes:generate. -->
  • data-store#append_event
  • data-store#read_events

What this skill does

Five runners:

  • read: collect account evidence from the live API through the twitter connector. Queries: snapshot, posts, mentions, search, following, followers. A query without params.user_id reads the authenticated account; with it, another account. The connector reads whole pages until it has at least max_items, keeps every item of them, and reports in next_cursor where a further read starts (pass it back as params.pagination_token). Emits twitter.evidence.v1. Read-only; no gate.
  • read-archive: inspect one contained X archive export (tweets.js, following.js, or follower.js) through the runtime's digest-bound artifact page seam. Twitter code receives bounded, record-complete pages and never a path or whole-file escape hatch. The runtime snapshots up to 512 MiB and this skill requests 512 KiB pages; the page size is not a total archive limit. Emits the same twitter.evidence.v1 packet; no gate.
  • plan: turn one bounded objective plus evidence into twitter.plan.v1, an explicit list of typed acts with rationale, using agent judgment, then bind the exact plan through native data.digest. This is the curated lane, for dozens of acts that each deserve a reason. A plan is a draft; it delivers nothing. The result exposes twitter_plan.data and the matching digest_result.data.digest required by execute; callers never calculate the digest themselves.
  • select: the bulk lane. Apply a deterministic predicate to an archive export and emit a compact plan, no agent judgment. Use it when the criterion is mechanical and the match set runs to thousands, where a per-item rationale would be wrong and would exceed the runtime output limit. Two targets: posts pages tweets.js and emits delete_post acts (predicate: author, date range, engagement threshold), with identical results across page sizes; users reads a bounded following.js bundle and emits unfollow acts (predicate: non_mutual: true for accounts you follow that do not follow back, needing follower.js too, or an explicit user_ids list). Emits twitter.selection.v1 carrying a digest-bound twitter_plan.
  • execute: run the next batch of an approved plan as one twitter connector operation behind its own approval, sealing per-act outcomes into twitter.execution.v1 and appending one compact progress fact to a durable execution ledger. A batch is one published act (a post, reply, quote, or one thread segment), or the contiguous run of up to 50 acts of one other kind from the cursor. The approval binds that exact call. The kernel records each act's outcome as it lands and stops sending at a rate limit, so a monotonic cursor, not an accumulated id list, is enough to resume safely.

Resume and the execution ledger

execute is stateless per turn; the state lives in a data-store stream keyed by the immutable plan digest. The latest twitter.execution.progress.v1 event contains only the X account id the batch ran as, next_act_index, total_act_count, an optional in-progress thread segment cursor, and a bounded summary of the last batch. Its size is constant whether the plan has completed two acts or two thousand.

Each batch first reads the bound account. It runs only when that account is the plan's principal (account:@handle, any letter case) and, once the ledger has pinned an account id, the same account every earlier batch ran as; otherwise the run fails before anything is sent. The approval shows the verified @handle and account id.

The driver reads only the latest ledger event (read_events, limit: 1) and its stream version. It calls execute with that expected_version and the canonical key twitter:<plan_digest>:v<expected_version+1>. The runner performs the same tail read itself and refuses stale or misbound inputs before approval or provider work. After a committed batch, the driver repeats with the new version until next_act_index == total_act_count. It never scans history or folds completed ids. An invalid plan, digest mismatch, stale cursor, or already complete plan produces a sealed refusal/no-op receipt but does not append a fake state transition.

Threads use one extra bounded cursor: each segment is its own batch, and progress records the next segment plus the confirmed reply id until the last one posts, so a resumed thread never reposts a confirmed segment. The operator binds data_source_ref to durable local SQLite or another declared data-store adapter; the skill never opens the database directly.

Each runner emits exactly one packet for its lane: typed evidence with provenance and a content digest, a curated or bulk act plan bound by digest, or provider outcomes bound to the executed plan digest and appended to the ledger.

The act vocabulary, with its consequence class:

kindconsequenceparams
postpublic_sendtext
replypublic_sendtext, in_reply_to
quotepublic_sendtext, quote_of
threadpublic_sendtexts (ordered, max 25)
repostpublic_sendpost_id
delete_postlive_mutationpost_id
unfollowlive_mutationtarget_user_id
mutelive_mutationtarget_user_id
blocklive_mutationtarget_user_id
followlive_mutationtarget_user_id
likelive_mutationpost_id

Every kind is consequential, so every plan sets gates.human_approval_required: true. follow, like, and repost are engagement acts and share a hard cap of 10 per plan. Direct messages are outside this skill.

A published act is confirmed by reading the post back. The other kinds are acknowledged: X answers each with the resulting state (following: false, deleted: true), which is the evidence, and has no read of one follow or like cheap enough to confirm a batch. They set a state, so resending one changes nothing. An answer that does not state the resulting state stops the cursor at that act, and a later batch sends it again.

Post and reply text, and each thread segment, is a non-empty string of at most 4000 characters, published verbatim; ids are X id strings. A plan that breaks either is refused before approval.

When to use this skill

  • Promote a release, publish a thread, or reply to a mention on behalf of a named principal, with content bound verbatim in the plan.
  • Audit an account's own post history or following list and prune it: bulk delete old posts, unfollow low-value accounts, against operator-stated criteria.
  • Gather timeline, mention, or search evidence for downstream research, triage, or lead skills that consume twitter.evidence.v1.
  • Route a send-as plan onto X as its provider delivery lane.

When not to use this skill

  • To send direct messages or manage DM conversations.
  • To farm engagement: follow-churn, mass liking, coordinated reposting, or any volume pattern designed to game visibility. The engagement cap is not a budget to fill.
  • To mention, reply to, or dogpile users who have not engaged with the principal, at volume.
  • To operate an account the operator does not control, or to automate consumer account creation.
  • To bypass the approval gate, the act caps, or the operator's spending limit on the pay-per-use API.

Procedure

For the plan runner, build twitter_plan this way:

  1. Hold one bounded objective. If the ask bundles unrelated jobs (a promo thread plus a follow purge), return needs_input with the split.
  2. Ground every reference. Ids for delete_post, unfollow, reply, quote, like, mute, and block must come from evidence_json or an explicit operator-supplied id. If the evidence is missing or stale, name it as a blocker; never invent or approximate an id.
  3. Write public content into the act params verbatim: the exact text or texts to publish, shaped by brand_context when supplied. Do not plan a summary of what will be written; approval binds the exact words.
  4. Give every act a stable act_id (act-001 onward), its kind, params, its consequence from the table, and a one-line rationale tied to the objective or the operator's stated criteria.
  5. Apply operator_policy narrowly. A prune criterion like "no engagement and older than 2023" selects only posts the evidence shows meet it; borderline items go to open_questions, not into the act list.
  6. Keep the plan small: at most 50 acts, at most 10 engagement acts, threads at most 25 segments. A larger job becomes staged plans.
  7. Set decision: ready when acts are grounded and complete; needs_input for missing objective, principal, evidence, or content; reject for asks outside the vocabulary or inside the abuse boundaries.
  8. Never place credentials, bearer tokens, raw API dumps, or third-party personal data beyond public ids and handles in the plan.

Edge cases and stop conditions

  • Mixed objective: return needs_input with the runner or plan split.
  • Id not in evidence: blocker; the plan stays needs_input.
  • Prune criteria ambiguous: select the unambiguous items, list the rest in open_questions.
  • Rate limit or provider refusal during read: the read fails with the provider's reason; a read is whole or it fails.
  • Oversized user-selection archive: the current two-file users selector refuses when either bounded text file exceeds the native read limit; it never treats truncation as an empty following/follower set. read-archive itself remains paged. Do not claim an oversized users bulk plan was evaluated.
  • Rate limit during execute: nothing more is sent; the acts before it are settled and the packet reports next_act_index, remaining_count, and the reset time. After the reset, read the latest ledger version and invoke the next canonical batch; do not reconstruct ids.
  • One act refused: a refused act is recorded as failed with the provider's reason and the cursor moves past it. Unfollowing a deactivated account is already the state the act asked for, so it counts as done.
  • Plan digest mismatch on execute: the apply step refuses and executes nothing. A refusal is receipt evidence, not a fake ledger transition.
  • Stale stream version or batch key: refusal before the approval/provider boundary. Re-read the one-event ledger tail and derive the canonical key.
  • Partially posted thread: resume from the ledger's active_thread cursor; never restart the thread from its first confirmed segment.
  • Approval missing or denied: the execute graph stops at the gate.
  • No bound account: admission refuses before any provider call; bind one with runx credential set twitter.
  • Fully autonomous live posting requested: reject; the gate is the contract.

Output schema

  • twitter.evidence.v1: decision (ok or needs_input), source (live or archive), query, account, items[] (typed post or user records with metrics), item_count, truncated, next_cursor (where the next live read starts, or null), provenance (retrieved_via, the readback reference of the provider answers or the archive artifact, and content_digest), blockers[].
  • twitter.plan.v1 (returned as twitter_plan.data together with digest_result.data.digest): decision (ready, needs_input, reject), objective, principal, acts[] (act_id, kind, params, consequence, rationale), gates (human_approval_required, approval_ref), evidence_refs[], optional context_bindings[] (packet_digest, applied_rules[]) preserving the exact brand or taste context applied by the planner, open_questions[], blockers[], success_checkpoint.
  • twitter.selection.v1: decision, objective, principal, predicate, matched, scanned, truncated, twitter_plan (a twitter.plan.v1), plan_digest, blockers[]. The twitter_plan is what a driver hands to execute, and plan_digest is bound so the approved and executed bytes are provably identical.
  • twitter.execution.v1: decision (executed, partial, stopped, refused, noop), plan_digest, principal, results[] (act_id, kind, consequence, status, provider_ref, detail) for the current bounded batch, next_act_index, total_act_count, remaining_count, optional active_thread, rate, blockers[], and success_checkpoint. A ready batch also carries the compact twitter.execution.progress.v1 ledger delta.

Worked example

Input: objective "delete my zero-engagement posts from before 2024", principal account:@example, evidence from read-archive(query: posts, archive_file: data/tweets.js) showing three matching posts, operator_policy "keep anything with replies".

Output: decision: ready; three delete_post acts, each carrying the post id from the evidence and a rationale quoting its age and zero metrics; gates.human_approval_required: true; one borderline post with two replies listed in open_questions. Execution then stops at the approval gate, and the sealed receipt binds the approved digest to the three deletions the provider confirmed.

Inputs

  • read: query (required), params (user_id, q, pagination_token), max_items.
  • read-archive: query and relative archive_file (required), archive_base (workspace default, or skill for packaged fixtures), and max_items.
  • plan: objective (required), principal (required), evidence_json, operator_policy, brand_context, operator_context.
  • select: objective (required), principal (required), target (posts default, or users), archive_file (posts), following_file and followers_file (users), predicate (required: posts take rt_of, is_retweet, text_prefix, text_contains, max_likes, max_reposts, before_year, after_year; users take non_mutual or user_ids), archive_base, max_acts.
  • execute: plan_json and plan_digest (required), data_source_ref (required), expected_version (required), idempotency_key (required), max_acts (acts per batch, hard-capped at 50). idempotency_key must be exactly twitter:<plan_digest>:v<expected_version+1>; the runner independently verifies both values against the durable one-event tail before execution.

Credentials and cost

The twitter connector declares two credentials, and the bound account's credential decides how a request authenticates. Credentials never appear as inputs or receipt material.

  • user: one JSON object holding consumer_key, consumer_secret, access_token, access_secret (OAuth 1.0a user context). Required for every mutation and for the authenticated account's own reads. Bind it with runx credential set twitter --credential user --from-stdin.
  • app: the app-context bearer token, enough for search and reads that name another account by user_id. Bind it with runx credential set twitter --credential app --from-stdin.

The X API bills per request on current plans and a post containing a link costs a large multiple of a plain one, so prefer archive exports for bulk history, set a spending cap in the developer portal, and let max_items and the act caps bound each run.

Agent task contract

twitter-plan

Follow the plan procedure and act vocabulary above. Return one twitter_plan containing decision, objective, principal, typed acts, approval gates, evidence refs, open questions, blockers, and a truthful success checkpoint. Every referenced post or user id must be grounded in supplied evidence, and every public word must appear verbatim in the act params. A plan never executes, publishes, deletes, follows, or otherwise mutates the account.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.