business-ops
Skill97 starsChanged 33 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Route one business signal through a replayable governed ops graph: classify, docs, release, work, outreach, spend, and proof, with consequential actions stopping at the right gate.
4 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- notque/vexjoy-agenttheir own version, first seen Nov 7, 2026
- protocol/peruntheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
- remigiusz-antczak/deep-code-reviewtheir own version, first seen Oct 16, 2026
- notque/claude-code-toolkittheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
Other versions4 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 4
- notque/claude-code-toolkit★ 448same name
- notque/vexjoy-agent★ 448same name
- protocol/perun★ 2same name
- remigiusz-antczak/deep-code-review★ 2same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository94 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- llms.txtllms.txt
- runxSkill
- adopt-skillSkill
- agencySkill
- answer-from-docsSkill
- attention-reviewSkill
- audit-receiptSkill
- brand-voiceSkill
- chargeSkill
- chief-of-staffSkill
- cold-outreachSkill
- content-pipelineSkill
- contract-drafterSkill
- conversation-replySkill
- conversation-reviewSkill
- crm-cleanupSkill
- cve-auditSkill
- data-storeSkill
- data-subject-requestSkill
- deep-researchSkill
- diagnose-skill-runSkill
- dispute-respondSkill
- ecosystem-briefSkill
- extractSkill
- ghostwriteSkill
- github-pr-commentSkill
- github-pr-reviewSkill
- github-syncSkill
- google-analyticsSkill
- google-calendarSkill
- google-search-consoleSkill
- governed-outboundSkill
- helpdeskSkill
- incident-commanderSkill
- issue-intakeSkill
- issue-to-prSkill
- issue-triageSkill
- knowledge-routerSkill
- lead-enrichmentSkill
- lead-qualifySkill
- least-privilegeSkill
- ledgerSkill
- list-hygiene-judgeSkill
- marketplace-invokeSkill
- meeting-followupSkill
- mock-chargeSkill
- mock-paySkill
- mock-refundSkill
- moltbookSkill
- n8n-handoffSkill
- nitrosendSkill
- nws-weather-forecastSkill
- open-meteo-weather-forecastSkill
- operator-inboxSkill
- ops-deskSkill
- organic-growthSkill
- policy-authorSkill
- postmortem-makerSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 127
If durable state is actually required, select route_and_append, supply the data source, aggregate, expected version, and idempotency key, …
- Distinctive: line 130
If the complete planning artifact is actually required, select main to fan out docs, release, issue, outreach, spend, and proof packets.
- Distinctive: line 140
Spend without amount, cap, recipient, rail, and approval: stop at the spend lane and route to a quote or payment skill.
- Distinctive: line 144
Provider success without provider evidence: do not mark complete. Route to proof audit.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Business Ops
Turn one business signal into a replayable operations graph.
business-ops routes one signal into one selected bounded lane without giving
the agent ambient authority. The default route runner returns that typed
lane immediately; it does not require event-store configuration or run
unrelated docs, release, work, outreach, spend, and audit branches. Select
route_and_append only when a chain needs a durable event plus projection
readback, and select main only when the full planning fan-out is the
requested artifact.
This is not a provider integration and not an operator dashboard. It is the small core shape that teams copy when they want one objective to fan out into a chain of skills, then replay that chain with receipts.
The explicit route_and_append runner takes the same selected lane, appends
its packet through data-store, reads back the projection, and returns one
route_persistence result that distinguishes a new commit from an idempotent
replay while preserving the selected lane_packet. The same graph
can use local JSON, SQLite, Postgres, D1, Redis, or a product adapter by changing
the data_source_ref binding. Its aggregate id, expected version, and
idempotency key stay explicit because guessing them would corrupt durable
workflow state.
Composes
<!-- Generated from the native execution closure; run pnpm core-skills:composes:generate. -->data-store#append_eventdata-store#read_projection
What this skill does
- Routes one business signal into one selected typed lane by default.
- Can explicitly fan the signal through representative lanes: docs, release, issue/PR, outreach planning, spend quoting, and proof audit.
- Produces structured lane packets with authority, gate, handoff, evidence, and readback fields.
- Demonstrates the runx split between proposal work and consequential action: drafts and plans can be produced, but sends, spend, merges, publishes, and deploys require a separate approval and execution lane.
- Gives downstream agents a clear handoff target instead of vague prose.
- Optionally persists the classified route for replay through
data-store.
What this skill deliberately does not do
- It does not call private providers, mutate a repo, post to GitHub, send email, schedule campaigns, move money, publish releases, or deploy services.
- It does not duplicate
ops-desk, product operator skills,send-as, vendor-specific provider skills,release,issue-to-pr,spend, or receipt-audit skills. - It does not turn "outbound marketing" into a hidden side effect. Outreach is
a plan lane here; real delivery routes to
send-asand then a provider adapter. Branded provider skills are concrete adapters, not branches in this core graph. - It does not treat the graph receipt as proof that an external provider action happened. Provider actions need provider evidence and their own receipt.
When to use this skill
- To show how runx chains skills into replayable business operations.
- To prototype a team-specific ops graph before wiring private provider tools.
- To route a product signal without giving the agent blanket repo, email, wallet, or deployment access.
- To explain why a governed workflow is more useful than a one-shot prompt: the route, stops, handoffs, and readbacks are explicit and replayable.
- To smoke-test graph execution and child receipts with no external account.
When not to use this skill
- To run a production launch, incident, release, campaign, support reply, payout, or spend flow as-is. Replace fixture lanes with real skills first.
- To approve a live send, spend, merge, publish, deploy, or customer-visible action.
- To hide project policy, customer lists, credentials, wallet keys, provider dumps, or private review context in the signal.
- To claim external work completed when only this fixture graph ran.
Mental model
standalone: signal -> one typed lane -> downstream handoff
durable: signal -> one typed lane -> append -> projection readback
fanout: signal -> all planning lanes -> approval stops -> governed handoffs -> proofThe useful part is the reusable route. A direct call returns one packet instead of forcing the operator through the whole operating system. A chain may persist that packet or request the complete fan-out, where some lanes are read-only, some draft-only, some blocked until approval, and one proof lane states how later execution should be verified.
How this maps to real runx work
- Docs and public proof route to a docs skill such as
sourceyor a product-owned documentation lane. - Release preparation routes to
release, with publish held behind a release approval. - Code work routes to
issue-to-pror a project-owned implementation lane, with merge held behind review. - Outreach and customer communication route first to
send-as, then to a provider connector that implements the send lane. Branded provider skills are the right place for vendor-specific compose, test, review, schedule, or send details. Broad outbound marketing should be its own skill or product broadcast skill, not extra logic hidden in this graph. - Spend and payments route to quote or payout skills with caps, recipient, rail, and settlement proof separated from the planning lane.
- Proof routes to receipt/history/audit skills and provider readbacks.
The fixture ops-lane step simply returns these packets without performing the
handoff. In a real project, replace each fixture lane with the named governed
skill runner or provider tool.
Procedure
- Receive one concise
signaland optionaloperator_context. - Route the selected
lane, which defaults toclassify. - Mark the lane as read-only, draft-only, approval-required, or proof-only and name its exact downstream owner.
- Return the typed lane packet and seal the graph receipt.
- If durable state is actually required, select
route_and_append, supply the data source, aggregate, expected version, and idempotency key, then read back the projection. - If the complete planning artifact is actually required, select
mainto fan out docs, release, issue, outreach, spend, and proof packets.
Edge cases and stop conditions
- Missing signal: return
needs_input. There is no safe route. - Vague objective: return a narrow classify packet and ask for the missing product, audience, repo, release, amount, or provider context.
- Live send without principal, audience, consent, digest, and approval: stop
at the outreach lane and route to
send-as. - Spend without amount, cap, recipient, rail, and approval: stop at the spend lane and route to a quote or payment skill.
- Merge, publish, deploy, or destructive mutation without approval: stop at the relevant lane and name the missing gate.
- Provider success without provider evidence: do not mark complete. Route to proof audit.
- Secret or private data in the signal: refuse to echo it into outputs; require redacted context or a provider-side readback instead.
Output schema
The default graph's public result is one lane_packet, ready for the named
downstream skill. The explicit main runner instead returns the complete
lane_packets artifact shown below. Runtime graph context retains producer
outputs for nested execution, while machine-readable CLI output omits exact
result-producer duplicates and child receipts bind the execution lineage.
lane_packets:
schema: runx.business_ops_route.v1
signal: string
lanes:
classify: lane_packet
docs: lane_packet
release: lane_packet
issue: lane_packet
send: lane_packet
spend: lane_packet
audit: lane_packetEach lane_packet has this shape:
lane_packet:
schema: runx.business_ops_lane.v1
lane: string
signal: string
status: ready | awaiting_approval | needs_input | refused
decision: route | prepare | draft | quote | verify | stop
kind: router | docs | release | work | outreach | spend | proof
consequence: read_only | draft | live_mutation | public_send | money_movement | proof
summary: string
why: string
authority:
requested: [string]
provided: fixture_only
gate:
approval_required: boolean
approval_gate: string | null
stop_reason: string | null
handoff:
interface: skill | graph | cli | hosted_api | workflow | provider_tool
lane_ref: string
runner_ref: string | null
command_hint: string | null
evidence:
inputs_required: [string]
readbacks: [string]
receipt_refs: [string]
risks: [string]
next: [string]Worked example
runx skill business-ops \
-i signal="launch readiness for API v2: docs, release, customer comms, and spend checks" \
--jsonThe default graph returns one classify lane packet with its authority class, evidence requirements, and next governed handoff. It does not configure a data store, run the other planning lanes, or call an external provider.
Inputs
signal(required): concise business operations signal to classify and route.lane(optional, defaultclassify): the one bounded lane to return.operator_context(optional): product policy, project topology, audience constraints, or known provider state. Context only, not authority.route_and_appendadditionally requiresdata_source_ref,resource,aggregate_id,expected_version, andidempotency_key; these identify durable state and therefore are never guessed.mainaccepts the signal and context only, and must be selected explicitly.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

