Issue Intake

Convert an inbound thread, support report, or operator request into one explicit intake decision plus the parent change artifact that downstream planning or mutation lanes must share.

This skill does not mutate code, open tickets, or publish replies directly. Its job is to classify the report, summarize it, draft the next helpful response, and recommend the next governed lane. That next lane must be explicit: issue-to-pr, work-plan, reply-only, or manual-review.

In supervisor-style flows, issue-intake is also the commencement gate. It decides whether work may start at all, whether the next step should stop at a review comment first, and whether mutation is justified yet. A recommended lane is not the same thing as build permission.

Use issue-to-pr only when the requested change is bounded enough for one governed remediation lane. Use work-plan for larger or multi-step work. Use reply-only when the right answer is guidance rather than mutation. Use manual-review when the report is ambiguous, risky, or missing key context.

Ground category, severity, and routing in the visible request and supplied product constraints. Put uncertainty in operator_notes instead of inventing confidence. The suggested reply should sound like the project owner and lead with the decision or next action, not read like a ticket macro.

Output Contract

intake_report must contain:

• category: one of bug, feature_request, docs, billing, account, question, or other
• severity: one of low, medium, high, or critical
• summary: concise summary of the actual request or report
• suggested_reply: a user-facing reply draft or operator handoff note
• recommended_lane: issue-to-pr, work-plan, reply-only, or manual-review
• rationale: why that lane is the right next step
• needs_human: boolean
• operator_notes: array of caveats, missing context, or escalation notes

intake_report may also include supervisor-facing control fields:

• commence_decision: approve, hold, reject, or needs_human
• action_decision: proceed_to_build, proceed_to_plan, request_review, or stop
• review_target: thread, outbox_entry, or none
• review_comment: markdown comment body for the supervisor to post before the next lane proceeds

When present, these fields mean:

• commence_decision gates whether the supervisor may start any downstream work at all
• action_decision=proceed_to_plan means the supervisor may open a planning lane such as work-plan, but still may not start repo mutation
• action_decision=request_review means the supervisor should post review_comment to the chosen review_target and stop there until a later approval or rerun authorizes mutation
• review_target=outbox_entry only makes sense when a current outbox entry already exists. If no draft change, message surface, or other outbox entry exists yet, the supervisor should fall back to the source thread and say that clearly in the posted comment
• action_decision=proceed_to_plan should usually still result in a public supervisor comment so the hold/plan decision is visible outside the raw receipt stream
• recommended_lane=issue-to-pr alone does not authorize a build lane

Always emit change_set alongside intake_report.

Also emit signal when a source event is admitted. signal must follow runx.signal.v1 and carry the source reference, authenticity or trust level, dedupe fingerprint, evidence references, and source-thread preview. This packet is the portable world-before-action state that work-plan, issue-to-pr, hosted queues, and source-thread projections preserve.

Close the Runx turn after intake is complete with terminal closure control metadata: a disposition, stable reason code, and concise summary. Closure is receipt control state, not part of the issue-intake artifact, and must not pretend the recommended downstream lane has already executed.

When an adapter has provider context beyond the visible thread text, attach it to signal.evidence_refs or a referenced artifact. Source adapters own provider-specific fetching and redaction before calling this skill; this skill only reasons over the supplied, reviewer-safe signal and artifacts.

Hydration is a gate, not a best-effort decoration. If supplied signal or artifact metadata says provider context is still needed, do not select action_decision=proceed_to_build. Use manual-review or request_review and explain the missing adapter context in operator_notes. If provider context is unavailable, use the remaining signal only when it is still concrete enough for a bounded reply, plan, or PR; otherwise stop for human review.

The change_set is the parent artifact for any later planning or worker fanout. It is what keeps multiple repo-scoped lanes aligned to one shared objective.

change_set must contain:

• change_set_id
• thread_locator
• summary
• category
• severity
• recommended_lane
• commence_decision
• action_decision
• target_surfaces: array of objects with:
  • surface: repo, product surface, or bounded target name
  • kind: one of repo, package, docs, support, or other
  • mutating: boolean
  • rationale: why this surface is implicated
• shared_invariants: array of constraints that all downstream lanes must preserve
• success_criteria: array of concrete outcomes that define success for the whole change
• outbox_entry (optional): current outbox entry for status updates, replies, or draft-change refreshes when the caller already knows it

When recommended_lane=issue-to-pr, also include thread_change_request with:

• task_id
• thread_title
• thread_body
• thread_locator
• thread (optional)
• outbox_entry (optional)
• size: one of micro, small, medium, or large
• risk: one of low, medium, or high

When recommended_lane=work-plan, also include workspace_change_plan_request with:

• change_set_id
• objective
• project_context
• thread_locator
• thread (optional)
• target_surfaces
• shared_invariants
• success_criteria

Do not emit both thread_change_request and workspace_change_plan_request for the same report.

Prefer conservative routing:

• if the report is bounded and well-understood, use commence_decision=approve and action_decision=proceed_to_build
• if the next step should be planning instead of mutation, use commence_decision=approve and action_decision=proceed_to_plan
• if the likely next lane is clear but mutation or planning should wait for maintainer confirmation, use commence_decision=approve and action_decision=request_review
• if the report is ambiguous, under-specified, or risky, use commence_decision=hold or needs_human

Inputs

• thread_title: canonical thread title
• thread_body: canonical thread body or request text
• thread_locator (optional): canonical locator for the bounded thread, such as an issue, chat thread, ticket, or local agent session
• thread (optional): provider-backed thread for the current thread
• outbox_entry (optional): current outbox entry for replies, draft changes, or refreshes
• signal (optional): provider-neutral runx.signal.v1 observation gathered by the source adapter before decision
• artifact (optional): bounded, reviewer-safe source evidence supplied by the source adapter; provider fetching and redaction must already be complete
• product_context (optional): product-specific constraints or routing hints
• operator_context (optional): maintainer or support posture guidance
• source_event (optional): admitted Slack, Sentry, GitHub, file, API, or other provider event. Consuming repos decide source filters before calling this skill.
• source_policy (optional): source admission and routing policy. Do not hardcode channel names, Sentry projects, or owners in this skill.
• operational_policy (optional): runx.operational_policy.v1 packet used by downstream repo-changing lanes for source, target, runner, and source-thread admission.