agentleFS
runxhqrunxhq/runx/skills/data-subject-request/SKILL.md

data-subject-request

Skill97 starsChanged 32 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Judge a data subject erasure or export request against explicit policy evidence, record the verdict durably through data-store, and emit only a bounded handoff for a separate governed downstream run.

The file

Files
SKILL.md

Data Subject Request

Judge whether a data subject request is in policy without erasing, exporting, or sending anything. The skill reads a request packet, requestor proof, and policy bounds, decides eligibility deterministically, appends the verdict to the subject request event stream through data-store, and returns a bounded handoff that a separate governed operator run may consume.

This is not a legal authority and does not replace counsel. It is an execution boundary for policy evidence: the receipt proves which inputs were inspected, which lawful basis was named, which scope was allowed or refused, and which durable verdict was appended.

Composes

<!-- Generated from the native execution closure; run pnpm core-skills:composes:generate. -->
  • data-store#append_event

Procedure

  1. Native data.digest binds the exact request packet and policy.
  2. Deterministic judgment: the request type must be erasure or export, the identity provider must be in trusted_identity_providers, the proof must carry a valid verified_at and a sha256 assertion digest bound to the same subject, a lawful basis must be named for the request type, and every requested data class must sit inside both scope_bounds.data_classes and the type-specific allowed list. Any failure refuses with every reason named; nothing is inferred.
  3. The verdict, eligible or refused, is appended to the pinned data-store stream with optimistic concurrency and an idempotency key, so repeated runs cannot double-record.
  4. The final packet binds the append evidence and both digests. An eligible verdict carries a bounded handoff (erasure operator, or read-projection through redact-pii into send-as for export); a refusal carries escalation to human_privacy_review and no handoff.

downstream_effect_performed is always false; the downstream operator owns the actual erasure or export under its own authority and receipt.

Output

subject_request_verdict (runx.data_subject_request.v1) carries request, decision, escalation, legal, requestor, scope_bounds, handoff or null, persistence with the committed stream version, and both input digests.

Inputs are request_packet, requestor_proof, policy, and the data-store binding (data_source_ref, resource, aggregate_id, expected_version, idempotency_key).

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.