data-subject-request
Skill97 starsChanged 32 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Judge a data subject erasure or export request against explicit policy evidence, record the verdict durably through data-store, and emit only a bounded handoff for a separate governed downstream run.
In this repository94 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- llms.txtllms.txt
- runxSkill
- adopt-skillSkill
- agencySkill
- answer-from-docsSkill
- attention-reviewSkill
- audit-receiptSkill
- brand-voiceSkill
- business-opsSkill
- chargeSkill
- chief-of-staffSkill
- cold-outreachSkill
- content-pipelineSkill
- contract-drafterSkill
- conversation-replySkill
- conversation-reviewSkill
- crm-cleanupSkill
- cve-auditSkill
- data-storeSkill
- deep-researchSkill
- diagnose-skill-runSkill
- dispute-respondSkill
- ecosystem-briefSkill
- extractSkill
- ghostwriteSkill
- github-pr-commentSkill
- github-pr-reviewSkill
- github-syncSkill
- google-analyticsSkill
- google-calendarSkill
- google-search-consoleSkill
- governed-outboundSkill
- helpdeskSkill
- incident-commanderSkill
- issue-intakeSkill
- issue-to-prSkill
- issue-triageSkill
- knowledge-routerSkill
- lead-enrichmentSkill
- lead-qualifySkill
- least-privilegeSkill
- ledgerSkill
- list-hygiene-judgeSkill
- marketplace-invokeSkill
- meeting-followupSkill
- mock-chargeSkill
- mock-paySkill
- mock-refundSkill
- moltbookSkill
- n8n-handoffSkill
- nitrosendSkill
- nws-weather-forecastSkill
- open-meteo-weather-forecastSkill
- operator-inboxSkill
- ops-deskSkill
- organic-growthSkill
- policy-authorSkill
- postmortem-makerSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Files
Data Subject Request
Judge whether a data subject request is in policy without erasing, exporting,
or sending anything. The skill reads a request packet, requestor proof, and
policy bounds, decides eligibility deterministically, appends the verdict to
the subject request event stream through data-store, and returns a bounded
handoff that a separate governed operator run may consume.
This is not a legal authority and does not replace counsel. It is an execution boundary for policy evidence: the receipt proves which inputs were inspected, which lawful basis was named, which scope was allowed or refused, and which durable verdict was appended.
Composes
<!-- Generated from the native execution closure; run pnpm core-skills:composes:generate. -->data-store#append_event
Procedure
- Native
data.digestbinds the exact request packet and policy. - Deterministic judgment: the request type must be erasure or export, the
identity provider must be in
trusted_identity_providers, the proof must carry a validverified_atand a sha256 assertion digest bound to the same subject, a lawful basis must be named for the request type, and every requested data class must sit inside bothscope_bounds.data_classesand the type-specific allowed list. Any failure refuses with every reason named; nothing is inferred. - The verdict, eligible or refused, is appended to the pinned
data-storestream with optimistic concurrency and an idempotency key, so repeated runs cannot double-record. - The final packet binds the append evidence and both digests. An eligible
verdict carries a bounded handoff (erasure operator, or
read-projection through
redact-piiintosend-asfor export); a refusal carries escalation tohuman_privacy_reviewand no handoff.
downstream_effect_performed is always false; the downstream operator owns the
actual erasure or export under its own authority and receipt.
Output
subject_request_verdict (runx.data_subject_request.v1) carries request,
decision, escalation, legal, requestor, scope_bounds, handoff or
null, persistence with the committed stream version, and both input digests.
Inputs are request_packet, requestor_proof, policy, and the data-store
binding (data_source_ref, resource, aggregate_id, expected_version,
idempotency_key).
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

