lead-enrichment
Skill97 starsChanged 33 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Normalize factual person and company evidence for one confidently matched lead, preserving provenance, freshness, missing fields and conflicts.
12 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- vijaysuperpositionist/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- SELAT-AI/selat-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 4, 2026
- omnimay/skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 18, 2026
- 0xMassi/webclaw-skilltheir own version, first seen Sep 14, 2026
- superagnt/leveragetheir own version, first seen Sep 11, 2026
- Yashraj00700/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 11, 2026
Other versions12 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 12
- chadboyda/agent-gtm-skills★ 77same name
- kevinbadi/ai-os-skills★ 69same name
- CodeAlive-AI/ceo-ai-os★ 9same name
- superagnt/leverage★ 6same name
- 0xMassi/webclaw-skill★ 2same name
- omnimay/skills★ 2same name
- SELAT-AI/selat-skills★ 2same name
- SkillMedev/b2b-prospecting-engine★ 1same name
- SpiderIQ/skills★ 1same name
- Typeless-Git/skills★ 1same name
2 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository94 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- llms.txtllms.txt
- runxSkill
- adopt-skillSkill
- agencySkill
- answer-from-docsSkill
- attention-reviewSkill
- audit-receiptSkill
- brand-voiceSkill
- business-opsSkill
- chargeSkill
- chief-of-staffSkill
- cold-outreachSkill
- content-pipelineSkill
- contract-drafterSkill
- conversation-replySkill
- conversation-reviewSkill
- crm-cleanupSkill
- cve-auditSkill
- data-storeSkill
- data-subject-requestSkill
- deep-researchSkill
- diagnose-skill-runSkill
- dispute-respondSkill
- ecosystem-briefSkill
- extractSkill
- ghostwriteSkill
- github-pr-commentSkill
- github-pr-reviewSkill
- github-syncSkill
- google-analyticsSkill
- google-calendarSkill
- google-search-consoleSkill
- governed-outboundSkill
- helpdeskSkill
- incident-commanderSkill
- issue-intakeSkill
- issue-to-prSkill
- issue-triageSkill
- knowledge-routerSkill
- lead-qualifySkill
- least-privilegeSkill
- ledgerSkill
- list-hygiene-judgeSkill
- marketplace-invokeSkill
- meeting-followupSkill
- mock-chargeSkill
- mock-paySkill
- mock-refundSkill
- moltbookSkill
- n8n-handoffSkill
- nitrosendSkill
- nws-weather-forecastSkill
- open-meteo-weather-forecastSkill
- operator-inboxSkill
- ops-deskSkill
- organic-growthSkill
- policy-authorSkill
- postmortem-makerSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 11 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 16
Do not claim that running this skill performs an Apollo lookup.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 11 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Lead Enrichment
Build factual context for one person or company. Enrichment answers what is
known about the subject. lead-qualify decides whether those facts meet an ICP;
cold-outreach prepares copy only after contact eligibility is supplied.
The default enrich runner reuses supplied structured evidence. It makes no
provider request and spends no enrichment credits. An upstream declared
connector operation can supply evidence; Apollo is the planned first lookup
provider, whose credential presentation remains a native connector dependency.
Do not claim that running this skill performs an Apollo lookup.
Procedure
- Bind one subject reference and the professional fields actually needed.
- Supply source references, native or upstream digests, observation times, explicit subject matches, and factual field/value pairs. A caller-supplied digest is provenance, not independent provider verification.
- Reuse only fresh sources confidently matched to that exact subject. A weak name match, stale observation or mismatched identity does not fill a field.
- Preserve conflicting values with their separate sources. Do not silently choose the latest value or invent a merged person from several matches.
- Return
enriched,partialorneeds_more_evidence, supported facts, missing fields, conflicts and the admitted source index.
The runner performs deterministic normalization rather than an extra model turn. Evidence acquisition and entity matching belong to the selected provider; commercial fit belongs to qualification. It does not infer buying intent, budget, consent, sensitive traits or private personal details.
Composition
Pass lead_enrichment_packet into lead-qualify#qualify together with the
actual ICP criteria. Preserve the native artifact digest. For another lookup,
request only missing professional fields with a bounded credit allowance and
the same subject identity. Never enable personal-email/phone reveal or a
waterfall merely to make an incomplete packet look complete.
The skill neither updates CRM records nor authorizes messages. The calling application owns refresh schedules and continuing work; connectors own exact provider requests, credential custody and billing evidence.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

