incident-commander
Skill97 starsChanged 33 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Advance one declared incident through a fixed roster, approval-bound communications planning, and receipt-backed resolution while canonical agency owns durable state.
12 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- darkweb19/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- kazemcodes/skill-treetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- milad-ahmd/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- jaskaranhundal/usap-skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 5, 2026
- poorvith-mp/skills-developertheir own version, first seen Aug 19, 2026
- Hassaan146/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Jul 25, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use pricing-strategist.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
ncklrsSkillpricing-strategist
Expert pricing strategy and monetization guidance for SaaS and digital products. Use when designing pricing tiers, creating pricing pages, setting value metrics, developing bundle strategies, planning price increases, writing pricing copy, analyzing competitive pricing, or optimizing annual vs monthly positioning. Use for packaging decisions, discount policies, enterprise pricing, and behavioral pricing tactics.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions12 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 12
- Hassaan146/claude-skills★ 18same name
- vignesh2027/Claude-Agentic-Skills2.0-version★ 6same name
- milad-ahmd/agent-skills★ 5same name
- jaskaranhundal/usap-skills★ 4same name
- csiddhant796-blip/claude-skills-collection★ 2same name
- Hussain-Elfalah/Agentic-Skills★ 2same name
- sohaibdevv/Claude-Agentic-Skills2.0-version★ 2same name
- kazemcodes/skill-tree★ 1same name
- mahiunfiltered/claude-code-skills★ 1same name
- darkweb19/skills★ 0same name
2 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository94 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- llms.txtllms.txt
- runxSkill
- adopt-skillSkill
- agencySkill
- answer-from-docsSkill
- attention-reviewSkill
- audit-receiptSkill
- brand-voiceSkill
- business-opsSkill
- chargeSkill
- chief-of-staffSkill
- cold-outreachSkill
- content-pipelineSkill
- contract-drafterSkill
- conversation-replySkill
- conversation-reviewSkill
- crm-cleanupSkill
- cve-auditSkill
- data-storeSkill
- data-subject-requestSkill
- deep-researchSkill
- diagnose-skill-runSkill
- dispute-respondSkill
- ecosystem-briefSkill
- extractSkill
- ghostwriteSkill
- github-pr-commentSkill
- github-pr-reviewSkill
- github-syncSkill
- google-analyticsSkill
- google-calendarSkill
- google-search-consoleSkill
- governed-outboundSkill
- helpdeskSkill
- issue-intakeSkill
- issue-to-prSkill
- issue-triageSkill
- knowledge-routerSkill
- lead-enrichmentSkill
- lead-qualifySkill
- least-privilegeSkill
- ledgerSkill
- list-hygiene-judgeSkill
- marketplace-invokeSkill
- meeting-followupSkill
- mock-chargeSkill
- mock-paySkill
- mock-refundSkill
- moltbookSkill
- n8n-handoffSkill
- nitrosendSkill
- nws-weather-forecastSkill
- open-meteo-weather-forecastSkill
- operator-inboxSkill
- ops-deskSkill
- organic-growthSkill
- policy-authorSkill
- postmortem-makerSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 10 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 8
Use this skill for one command decision inside an incident that already belongs to a Runx agency case.
- Very specific: line 59
Run the named skill separately.
- Very specific: line 66
Only resolve may return resolved.
- Distinctive: line 75
Run Incident Commander with that context and keep its sealed receipt.
- Distinctive: line 77
Run a named responder or communications skill only when the accepted turn calls for it, then feed that sealed member receipt into the next …
- Distinctive: line 98
Every result includes case and turn identity, a reason, validation findings, and effect state.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 10 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Incident Commander
Use this skill for one command decision inside an incident that already belongs
to a Runx agency case. It checks the folded case and fixed roster, asks the
canonical ops-desk skill for one bounded decision, then enforces the incident
rules before returning incident_turn.
The result is one bounded, receipt-backed command turn: an exact dispatch, approval escalation, verified resolution from a supplied member receipt, or actionable blocker. This skill does not append an agency event, acquire a case lease, send a message, call a provider, or close external state. The agency driver remains responsible for the expected-version append and for binding this run's sealed receipt to the case stream.
Composes
<!-- Generated from the native execution closure; run pnpm core-skills:composes:generate. -->ops-desk#advance
Required context
Supply case_id, driver_id, incident_objective, folded case_state, and a
fixed roster. The objective must be one of begin, assign, send,
resolve, or postmortem.
The roster has exactly three entries:
commander, which normally namesops-deskand its incident command scope;responder_lead, which names the response skill and its allowed scope;comms_lead, which namessend-asorslack-notifyand its allowed scope.
Each entry includes a principal, skill, and nonempty scope ceiling. Roles and
principals must be unique. An assign turn also needs case_state.named_owner
to match one roster role or principal.
case_state is a bounded projection, not the incident event history. Durable
history stays behind the agency data source. Include declaration status,
severity, scope, current turn, and only the evidence or pending decision needed
for this command turn.
Communications
A send starts from case_state.pending_escalation.proposed_handoff. That object
binds the exact comms_lead principal, send-as or slack-notify, runner
plan, channel, audience, and SHA-256 content digest.
The optional approval must contain that same principal and a nonempty reason.
Without approval, a valid handoff returns awaiting_approval. An approval from
another principal is refused. A matched approval can return a downstream
planning handoff with state ready_for_planning; delivery_status remains
not_sent and provider delivery remains not_executed.
Run the named skill separately. send-as plans a provider-neutral send.
slack-notify owns its governed Slack delivery lane. Return the later sealed
receipt through member_result and advance the agency case again. A delivery
claim without runx:receipt:sha256:<digest> is refused.
Resolution and durable state
Only resolve may return resolved. It needs either
case_state.resolution_evidence_ref or a successful member_result with a
valid Runx receipt reference. The result still says agency_state:
not_persisted; the agency driver must append the turn under compare-and-swap.
The normal driver sequence is:
- Open the case with canonical
agency openif it does not exist. - Advance agency to obtain the folded state and bounded dispatch context.
- Run Incident Commander with that context and keep its sealed receipt.
- Pass the result and receipt back to agency for the expected-version append.
- Run a named responder or communications skill only when the accepted turn calls for it, then feed that sealed member receipt into the next agency turn.
The agency receipt proves persistence. The Incident Commander receipt proves the local command decision. A downstream provider receipt and its readback prove delivery. Do not substitute one receipt for another owner's effect.
Outcomes
incident_turn.decision is one of:
advanced: a bounded dispatch or verified member result can continue;awaiting_approval: a valid communications proposal needs its exact roster principal's approval;resolved: linked resolution evidence permits the agency driver to persist closure;needs_input: required operator context, such as an assignment owner, is absent;refused: supplied state, roster, approval, scope, or evidence contradicts the incident rules.
Every result includes case and turn identity, a reason, validation findings, and effect state. Missing information is not reported as a negative operational fact. A refusal does not mutate the case.
Recovery
For needs_input, correct the folded projection or name the roster owner and
rerun. For awaiting_approval, keep the proposed audience and digest unchanged,
obtain approval from the exact comms_lead, and rerun. For refused, resolve
the listed validation finding rather than weakening the roster or scope. For a
provider or responder failure, preserve its receipt and let agency decide the
next bounded turn.
Inspect and test the package with the repository-built CLI:
./crates/target/debug/runx skill inspect ./skills/incident-commander --json
./crates/target/debug/runx harness ./skills/incident-commander --jsonRegistry publication is separate from authoring. Preserve the contributor
identity mossony/incident-commander; claim registry availability only after a
publish readback for the exact package digest.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

