agentleFS
qiaomiaojoeqiaomiaojoe/ai-academic-workflow/skills/topic-review-systematic/SKILL.md

topic-review-systematic

Skill10 starsChanged 19 days agoLicence not identifiedView on GitHub

「AI学术训练营」选题工作流 · 综述①系统综述(乔淼PhD · AI学术工作流)。为一篇**系统综述(systematic review)**磨选题的三阶段教练(A 挖掘 → B 校准 → C 输出):理清研究对象/范围/问题 → 收窄问题+纳入排除标准+检索协议+是否 meta-analysis → 综述规格 + PXYV 投影。方法锚 Snyder (2019);范例锚 Snyder et al. (2016)。适用:窄而具体的问题、要"证据说话"、领域有一批可比实证。支持断点续跑,可独立运行。Trigger on:"做系统综述选题"、"systematic review 选题"、"我要综合某效应的证据"、"帮我把系统综述题目磨清楚"、"systematic literature review topic"。

The file

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.