analyze-qualitative-data
Skill10 starsChanged 19 days agoLicence not identifiedView on GitHub
Use when analyzing qualitative social science data following Neuman's Social Research Methods Ch 14 — three-stage coding (open/axial/selective), analytic memo writing, outcropping detection, and seven analytic strategies (ideal types, successive approximation, illustrative method, domain analysis, Mill's analytic comparison, narrative analysis). Trigger on requests like "code these interviews", "analyze field notes", "thematic analysis", "narrative analysis", "compare these cases", "我要做定性分析", "帮我编码这些访谈", "做主题分析".
In this repository45 other files it gives its agents.
- academic-project-initSkill
- analyze-quantitative-dataSkill
- article-frameworkSkill
- cnkiSkill
- critical-paper-readingSkill
- data-analysis-roundSkill
- findings-synthesisSkill
- fulltext-draftSkill
- journal-rankSkill
- journal-requirements-checkSkill
- knowledge-module-genSkill
- knowledge-module-listSkill
- literature-analysisSkill
- literature-searchSkill
- lit-pdf-zoteroSkill
- lit-pyramidSkill
- lit-verifySkill
- manuscript-diagnosisSkill
- manuscript-revisionSkill
- methodology-draftSkill
- methods-mapSkill
- model-paper-deconstructSkill
- pxyv-searchSkill
- research-designSkill
- research-gap-scanSkill
- review-blueprintSkill
- review-draft-assemblySkill
- review-draftSkill
- review-response-planningSkill
- review-revision-responseSkill
- review-synthesisSkill
- skill-forgeSkill
- skill-workshop-planSkill
- sr-search-recordSkill
- submission-package-preparationSkill
- submission-task-intakeSkill
- topic-concept-constructionSkill
- topic-hypothesis-testingSkill
- topic-method-drivenSkill
- topic-pxyv-parseSkill
- topic-review-integrativeSkill
- topic-review-semisystematicSkill
- topic-review-systematicSkill
- topic-theory-interpretationSkill
- topic-workbenchSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈6
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
The licence could not be identified — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

