research-design
Skill10 starsChanged 19 days agoLicence not identifiedView on GitHub
研究设计完整任务入口(乔淼PhD · AI学术训练营 · AI学术工作流)。编排两个步骤 skill 跑完一次完整研究设计:methods-map 方法地图 + 2-3 方案(末尾 CHECKPOINT 用户选)→ methodology-draft 展开为研究设计初稿 + 设计说明。只要单独某一步(只扫方法地图 / 已有方案只写初稿)时直接用对应步骤 skill。Trigger on:"帮我做研究设计"、"研究设计工作流"、"design my study"、"from methods survey to methodology draft"。
4 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- kinhluan/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- TerryFYL/ai-research-armytheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- victorbuto/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Apr 16, 2026
- Rlin1027/philosophy-research-agentstheir own version, first seen Feb 27, 2026
Other versions4 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 4
- victorbuto/claude-skills★ 22same name
- TerryFYL/ai-research-army★ 9same name
- kinhluan/skills★ 6same name
- Rlin1027/philosophy-research-agents★ 3same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository45 other files it gives its agents.
- academic-project-initSkill
- analyze-qualitative-dataSkill
- analyze-quantitative-dataSkill
- article-frameworkSkill
- cnkiSkill
- critical-paper-readingSkill
- data-analysis-roundSkill
- findings-synthesisSkill
- fulltext-draftSkill
- journal-rankSkill
- journal-requirements-checkSkill
- knowledge-module-genSkill
- knowledge-module-listSkill
- literature-analysisSkill
- literature-searchSkill
- lit-pdf-zoteroSkill
- lit-pyramidSkill
- lit-verifySkill
- manuscript-diagnosisSkill
- manuscript-revisionSkill
- methodology-draftSkill
- methods-mapSkill
- model-paper-deconstructSkill
- pxyv-searchSkill
- research-gap-scanSkill
- review-blueprintSkill
- review-draft-assemblySkill
- review-draftSkill
- review-response-planningSkill
- review-revision-responseSkill
- review-synthesisSkill
- skill-forgeSkill
- skill-workshop-planSkill
- sr-search-recordSkill
- submission-package-preparationSkill
- submission-task-intakeSkill
- topic-concept-constructionSkill
- topic-hypothesis-testingSkill
- topic-method-drivenSkill
- topic-pxyv-parseSkill
- topic-review-integrativeSkill
- topic-review-semisystematicSkill
- topic-review-systematicSkill
- topic-theory-interpretationSkill
- topic-workbenchSkill
The file
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

