agentleFS
qiaomiaojoeqiaomiaojoe/ai-academic-workflow/skills/review-draft/SKILL.md

review-draft

Skill10 starsChanged 19 days agoLicence not identifiedView on GitHub

综述文章初稿扩写(乔淼PhD · AI学术训练营 · AI学术工作流 · 综述文章工作台 · 管线终点)。把一篇**综述文章**(review 本身即整篇论文,贡献是综合/框架/议程)按其报告规范(系统→PRISMA / 半系统→RAMESES / 整合→Torraco 2005)扩写成综述初稿:读 综述选题.md 机器锚块定型定规范 + 证据综合.md 写综合/结果节(缺则占位,绝不编造数据/引语)+ 语料库 PRISMA 筛选记录写方法节 + 逐条引用核验出独立报告 + 参考文献表 + 反 AI 味 + 初稿纯净 + 转 docx。区别于 `review-draft-assembly`(那是给**实证论文**写文献综述**节**)。方法锚 Snyder (2019)。Trigger on:"写综述文章初稿"、"把综述扩写成初稿"、"按 PRISMA/RAMESES/Torraco 成文"、"draft my review article"、"write up my literature review paper"。

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.