agentleFS
qiaomiaojoeqiaomiaojoe/ai-academic-workflow/skills/review-response-planning/SKILL.md

review-response-planning

Skill10 starsChanged 19 days agoLicence not identifiedView on GitHub

审稿意见与回应决策(乔淼PhD · AI学术训练营 · AI学术工作流 · 投稿与审稿)。收到编辑信和审稿意见后,完整保留每条意见原文,拆成稳定意见 ID 和子项,逐条解释要求、提出接受 / 部分接受 / 不接受 / 补分析的回应建议和所需证据,形成作者逐条决定的审稿意见台账;作者批准的项交 review-revision-response。AI 建议和作者决定分开写,不漏意见。Trigger on:"拆解审稿意见"、"先给我回应审稿意见的方案"、"整理编辑和审稿人的意见"、"plan my response to reviewers"、"parse these reviewer comments"。

The file

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.