analyze-quantitative-data
Skill10 starsChanged 19 days agoLicence not identifiedView on GitHub
Use when analyzing quantitative social science data following Neuman's Social Research Methods Ch 12 — codebook creation, data cleaning, univariate descriptive statistics, bivariate association, multivariate analysis (elaboration paradigm + multiple regression), and inferential statistics (significance testing, Type I/II errors). Trigger on requests like "analyze this survey data", "run regression on X", "check bivariate relationship between A and B", "what does this codebook need", "interpret these statistics", "我要做定量分析", "帮我跑回归", "分析这份调查数据".
In this repository45 other files it gives its agents.
- academic-project-initSkill
- analyze-qualitative-dataSkill
- article-frameworkSkill
- cnkiSkill
- critical-paper-readingSkill
- data-analysis-roundSkill
- findings-synthesisSkill
- fulltext-draftSkill
- journal-rankSkill
- journal-requirements-checkSkill
- knowledge-module-genSkill
- knowledge-module-listSkill
- literature-analysisSkill
- literature-searchSkill
- lit-pdf-zoteroSkill
- lit-pyramidSkill
- lit-verifySkill
- manuscript-diagnosisSkill
- manuscript-revisionSkill
- methodology-draftSkill
- methods-mapSkill
- model-paper-deconstructSkill
- pxyv-searchSkill
- research-designSkill
- research-gap-scanSkill
- review-blueprintSkill
- review-draft-assemblySkill
- review-draftSkill
- review-response-planningSkill
- review-revision-responseSkill
- review-synthesisSkill
- skill-forgeSkill
- skill-workshop-planSkill
- sr-search-recordSkill
- submission-package-preparationSkill
- submission-task-intakeSkill
- topic-concept-constructionSkill
- topic-hypothesis-testingSkill
- topic-method-drivenSkill
- topic-pxyv-parseSkill
- topic-review-integrativeSkill
- topic-review-semisystematicSkill
- topic-review-systematicSkill
- topic-theory-interpretationSkill
- topic-workbenchSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
The licence could not be identified — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.