post-exploitation
Skill2 starsChanged 47 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use after gaining access during an authorized engagement to demonstrate impact — situational awareness, credential access, lateral movement, and reaching objectives — while documenting the path. Covers methodology mapped to MITRE ATT&CK (Discovery, Credential Access, Lateral Movement, Collection, Exfiltration, Impact) with detection signals for the blue team. Authorized engagements only; prove and document rather than cause harm.
5 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- mahumadad/quarrytheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- AIPentest/CyberStrikeAItheir own version, first seen Nov 3, 2026
- Ed1s0nZ/CyberStrikeAItheir own version, first seen Nov 3, 2026
- Kxiandaoyan/CyberStrikeAItheir own version, first seen Sep 7, 2026
- kekurttel/pentest-skillstheir own version, first seen Aug 3, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use ai-llm-app-attack, attack-surface-recon and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
KxiandaoyanSkillai-llm-app-attack
AI/LLM应用攻击:提示注入,Agent工具滥用RCE,RAG投毒,MCP供应链,torch.load pickle RCE。Use when testing LLM apps, agents, RAG, MCP plugins, or AI model file risks.
Also in 3 projects that use this
KxiandaoyanSkillattack-surface-recon
侦察/攻击面测绘:被动whois/amass/crt.sh/FOFA/Shodan,主动subfinder/httpx/naabu/katana/nuclei,DNS地域/CDN/Nginx catch-all/宝塔/UniApp指纹。开局第一动作,认知写入项目黑板。Use when starting recon, asset mapping, fingerprinting, or CDN/DNS bypass discovery.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +10 more from Kxiandaoyan
Other versions5 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 5
- AIPentest/CyberStrikeAI★ 8.5ksame name
- Ed1s0nZ/CyberStrikeAI★ 8.5ksame name
- Kxiandaoyan/CyberStrikeAI★ 19same name
- kekurttel/pentest-skills★ 4same name
- mahumadad/quarry★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository25 other files it gives its agents.
- active-directory-pentestSkill
- agentic-ai-securitySkill
- api-secure-designSkill
- api-security-auditSkill
- cicd-supplychain-securitySkill
- cloud-pentestSkill
- container-k8s-pentestSkill
- detection-engineeringSkill
- entra-cloud-pentestSkill
- iot-embedded-pentestSkill
- llm-app-defenseSkill
- llm-redteamSkill
- mobile-pentestSkill
- network-device-pentestSkill
- network-pentestSkill
- privilege-escalationSkill
- recon-osintSkill
- red-team-opsSkill
- report-writingSkill
- social-engineeringSkill
- source-code-reviewSkill
- threat-modelSkill
- vuln-chainingSkill
- web-app-pentestSkill
- wireless-pentestSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 27
Document each hop as an attack-path edge (feeds vuln-chaining).
- Distinctive: line 35
Never execute destructive "impact" techniques (ransomware/wiping) against real systems.
- Very specific: line 41
Remove created accounts/files/artifacts.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Post-Exploitation & Lateral Movement
What to do after access, to demonstrate real business impact for the report — mapped to MITRE ATT&CK. In an authorized engagement the goal is to prove what an attacker could reach and document it, not to damage systems or maintain covert access.
0. Authorization & conduct gate
- Post-exploitation and lateral movement are in scope; objectives defined.
- Data-access limits (what you may read/collect) and no-destruction rule.
- Track every change/artifact for cleanup; provide a deconfliction identifier to the SOC.
1. Situational awareness (Discovery)
- Identify the host, privileges, users, processes, and security tooling present.
- Map reachable networks, shares, services, and trust relationships from this position.
- Locate valuable data stores and next-hop targets.
2. Credential access
- Harvest credentials/keys/tokens from memory, files, config, browsers, and credential stores (authorized).
- Assess reuse potential across hosts, services, and cloud (→
active-directory-pentest,entra-cloud-pentest). - Detection signal: credential-dumping and unusual token use — verify the blue team sees it.
3. Lateral movement
- Move using harvested credentials/keys via legitimate protocols (remote services, admin protocols) rather than noisy exploits where possible.
- Document each hop as an attack-path edge (feeds
vuln-chaining). - Fix themes: network segmentation, least privilege, MFA on admin access, monitoring of remote-exec and unusual auth.
4. Collection & objective completion
- Reach the agreed objective (specific data, system, or "domain/cloud dominance") and capture proof (screenshots/hashes/redacted samples) — collect the minimum needed to demonstrate impact.
5. Exfiltration & impact (simulate, don't harm)
- Demonstrate an exfiltration path with benign/synthetic data or a small redacted sample per RoE; do not remove real sensitive data.
- Never execute destructive "impact" techniques (ransomware/wiping) against real systems.
6. Persistence (understand for detection; avoid lasting)
Understand persistence techniques to advise detection, but in engagements prove capability and remove any artifacts. Provide defenders detection guidance instead.
7. Cleanup & deconfliction
- Remove created accounts/files/artifacts; provide a full timeline of actions and touched systems for the blue team.
8. Reporting
Present the end-to-end attack path, the business impact reached, detection opportunities at each step, and prioritized fixes that break the path. Route path analysis to vuln-chaining. Checklist: references/postex-checklist.md.
<sub>© 2026 noahfranklin · Part of the Gideon security suite · MIT License · Original work.</sub>
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

