change-request
Skill1 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Create a change management request with impact analysis, rollback plan, and CAB review preparation. Use when proposing a system or process change needing approval, preparing a change record for CAB, or documenting risk and rollback before a deployment. Trigger with "change request", "change management", "CAB submission", "RFC", or "request for change".
6 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- danielvm-git/bigpowerstheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- Lwhieldon/claude-project-mgmt-playbooktheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- anthropics/knowledge-work-pluginstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- aygp-dr/standard-changetheir own version, first seen Sep 16, 2026
- bouob/sysadmin-skillstheir own version, first seen May 11, 2026
- kenmulford/PMSkillstheir own version, first seen Apr 19, 2026
Other versions6 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 6
- anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins★ 35ksame name
- danielvm-git/bigpowers★ 288same name
- Lwhieldon/claude-project-mgmt-playbook★ 4same name
- bouob/sysadmin-skills★ 2same name
- aygp-dr/standard-change★ 0same name
- kenmulford/PMSkills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository164 other files it gives its agents.
- instrument-data-to-allotropeSkill
- literature-reviewSkill
- nextflow-developmentSkill
- scientific-problem-selectionSkill
- scvi-toolsSkill
- single-cell-rna-qcSkill
- discover-brandSkill
- enforce-voiceSkill
- generate-guidelinesSkill
- csat-reportSkill
- customer-escalationSkill
- customer-researchSkill
- draft-responseSkill
- kb-articleSkill
- sentiment-analysisSkill
- ticket-triageSkill
- analyzeSkill
- build-dashboardSkill
- create-vizSkill
- data-context-extractorSkill
- data-modelingSkill
- data-pipelineSkill
- etl-designSkill
- explore-dataSkill
- sql-queriesSkill
- statistical-analysisSkill
- validate-dataSkill
- write-querySkill
- accessibility-reviewSkill
- component-librarySkill
- design-critiqueSkill
- design-handoffSkill
- design-systemSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- research-synthesisSkill
- user-researchSkill
- ux-copySkill
- wireframingSkill
- Agent DevelopmentSkill
- CLAUDE.md ManagementSkill
- MCP Server BuilderSkill
- Plugin DevelopmentSkill
- Prompt EngineeringSkill
- Skill CreatorSkill
- curriculum-designSkill
- lesson-planningSkill
- quiz-generatorSkill
- study-guideSkill
- tutoringSkill
- api-designSkill
- architectureSkill
- ci-cd-pipelineSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- database-migrationSkill
- debugSkill
- dependency-auditSkill
- deploy-checklistSkill
- documentationSkill
- error-handlingSkill
- git-workflowSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 28
Create structured change requests with impact analysis, risk assessment, implementation plan, rollback procedures, and CAB preparation.
- Very specific: line 40
Document: what is changing and why, systems affected (primary and dependent), users affected, service impact (downtime/degradation), data …
- Distinctive: line 97
Action: Document scope, identify all connected applications, assess risk (medium), build migration plan with maintenance window, define …
- Distinctive: line 100
Action: Create emergency CR with expedited approval, document the vulnerability, define hotfix deployment and rollback, note retrospective …
- Distinctive: line 104
Every change must have a rollback plan.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Change Request
Create structured change requests with impact analysis, risk assessment, implementation plan, rollback procedures, and CAB preparation.
Workflow
Step 1: Classify
- Standard: Pre-approved, low-risk, repeatable. No CAB required.
- Normal: Requires impact analysis and CAB approval.
- Emergency: Active incident or critical vulnerability. Expedited approval, retrospective CAB.
Step 2: Define Scope and Impact
Document: what is changing and why, systems affected (primary and dependent), users affected, service impact (downtime/degradation), data impact (schema changes, migrations), and rollback complexity (simple/moderate/complex).
Step 3: Assess Risk
Evaluate likelihood of failure, impact of failure, and overall risk (LOW/MEDIUM/HIGH/CRITICAL). Document mitigations: testing coverage, canary deploys, feature flags, monitoring.
Step 4: Implementation Plan
- Pre-change: Backups, notifications, pre-checks.
- Steps: Ordered actions with estimated duration and owner.
- Validation: Smoke tests, monitoring checks after each step.
- Window: Date, time, duration, go/no-go deadline.
Step 5: Rollback Plan
- Trigger: Specific conditions (error rate >X%, latency >Y ms).
- Steps: Ordered reversal actions with duration estimates.
- Data: Whether rollback affects data created during the window.
- Owner: Who has authority to initiate rollback.
Output Format
## Change Request
**CR ID**: CR-[YYYY]-[NNNN] | **Type**: [Standard / Normal / Emergency]
**Title**: [Brief title] | **Risk**: [LOW / MEDIUM / HIGH / CRITICAL]
### Change Description
**What**: [Change] | **Why**: [Justification] | **Systems**: [Affected]
### Impact Analysis
| Dimension | Assessment |
|-----------|-----------|
| Users affected | [Who/how many] |
| Service impact | [Downtime/degradation] |
| Dependent systems | [Upstream/downstream] |
### Implementation Plan
**Window**: [Date, Time-Time] | **Duration**: [Est.]
| Step | Action | Duration | Owner | Validation |
|------|--------|----------|-------|------------|
| 1 | [Backup] | 15 min | [Name] | Confirmed |
| 2 | [Deploy] | 30 min | [Name] | Tests pass |
### Rollback Plan
**Trigger**: [Conditions] | **Duration**: [Est.] | **Owner**: [Name]
| Step | Action | Duration |
|------|--------|----------|
| 1 | [Revert] | 10 min |
### Approvals
- [ ] Technical review -- [ ] CAB approval -- [ ] Business sign-offExamples
User: "Create a change request for the database migration to PostgreSQL 16" Action: Document scope, identify all connected applications, assess risk (medium), build migration plan with maintenance window, define rollback to snapshot restore.
User: "Emergency change -- patch the authentication service now" Action: Create emergency CR with expedited approval, document the vulnerability, define hotfix deployment and rollback, note retrospective CAB requirement.
Best Practices
- Every change must have a rollback plan. Documenting it forces you to verify rollback is possible.
- Specify rollback triggers in measurable terms, not subjective judgment.
- Schedule during low-traffic windows. Check for conflicting changes in the same window.
- Include validation steps after each implementation step, not just at the end.
- Communicate proactively: before, during, and after the change window.
- Link the CR to the incident, problem, or project that triggered it.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

