agentleFS
nisarthnisarth/claude-skills-store/skills/operations/change-request/SKILL.md

change-request

Skill1 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub

Create a change management request with impact analysis, rollback plan, and CAB review preparation. Use when proposing a system or process change needing approval, preparing a change record for CAB, or documenting risk and rollback before a deployment. Trigger with "change request", "change management", "CAB submission", "RFC", or "request for change".

6 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 4

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Create structured change requests with impact analysis, risk assessment, implementation plan, rollback procedures, and CAB preparation.

    line 28
  2. Very specific:

    Document: what is changing and why, systems affected (primary and dependent), users affected, service impact (downtime/degradation), data …

    line 40
  3. Distinctive:

    Action: Document scope, identify all connected applications, assess risk (medium), build migration plan with maintenance window, define …

    line 97
  4. Distinctive:

    Action: Create emergency CR with expedited approval, document the vulnerability, define hotfix deployment and rollback, note retrospective …

    line 100
  5. Distinctive:

    Every change must have a rollback plan.

    line 104

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Change Request

Create structured change requests with impact analysis, risk assessment, implementation plan, rollback procedures, and CAB preparation.

Workflow

Step 1: Classify

  • Standard: Pre-approved, low-risk, repeatable. No CAB required.
  • Normal: Requires impact analysis and CAB approval.
  • Emergency: Active incident or critical vulnerability. Expedited approval, retrospective CAB.

Step 2: Define Scope and Impact

Document: what is changing and why, systems affected (primary and dependent), users affected, service impact (downtime/degradation), data impact (schema changes, migrations), and rollback complexity (simple/moderate/complex).

Step 3: Assess Risk

Evaluate likelihood of failure, impact of failure, and overall risk (LOW/MEDIUM/HIGH/CRITICAL). Document mitigations: testing coverage, canary deploys, feature flags, monitoring.

Step 4: Implementation Plan

  • Pre-change: Backups, notifications, pre-checks.
  • Steps: Ordered actions with estimated duration and owner.
  • Validation: Smoke tests, monitoring checks after each step.
  • Window: Date, time, duration, go/no-go deadline.

Step 5: Rollback Plan

  • Trigger: Specific conditions (error rate >X%, latency >Y ms).
  • Steps: Ordered reversal actions with duration estimates.
  • Data: Whether rollback affects data created during the window.
  • Owner: Who has authority to initiate rollback.

Output Format

## Change Request
**CR ID**: CR-[YYYY]-[NNNN] | **Type**: [Standard / Normal / Emergency]
**Title**: [Brief title] | **Risk**: [LOW / MEDIUM / HIGH / CRITICAL]

### Change Description
**What**: [Change] | **Why**: [Justification] | **Systems**: [Affected]

### Impact Analysis
| Dimension | Assessment |
|-----------|-----------|
| Users affected | [Who/how many] |
| Service impact | [Downtime/degradation] |
| Dependent systems | [Upstream/downstream] |

### Implementation Plan
**Window**: [Date, Time-Time] | **Duration**: [Est.]
| Step | Action | Duration | Owner | Validation |
|------|--------|----------|-------|------------|
| 1 | [Backup] | 15 min | [Name] | Confirmed |
| 2 | [Deploy] | 30 min | [Name] | Tests pass |

### Rollback Plan
**Trigger**: [Conditions] | **Duration**: [Est.] | **Owner**: [Name]
| Step | Action | Duration |
|------|--------|----------|
| 1 | [Revert] | 10 min |

### Approvals
- [ ] Technical review -- [ ] CAB approval -- [ ] Business sign-off

Examples

User: "Create a change request for the database migration to PostgreSQL 16" Action: Document scope, identify all connected applications, assess risk (medium), build migration plan with maintenance window, define rollback to snapshot restore.

User: "Emergency change -- patch the authentication service now" Action: Create emergency CR with expedited approval, document the vulnerability, define hotfix deployment and rollback, note retrospective CAB requirement.

Best Practices

  • Every change must have a rollback plan. Documenting it forces you to verify rollback is possible.
  • Specify rollback triggers in measurable terms, not subjective judgment.
  • Schedule during low-traffic windows. Check for conflicting changes in the same window.
  • Include validation steps after each implementation step, not just at the end.
  • Communicate proactively: before, during, and after the change window.
  • Link the CR to the incident, problem, or project that triggered it.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.