documentation
Skill1 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Write and maintain technical documentation. Trigger with "write docs for", "document this", "create a README", "write a runbook", "onboarding guide", or when the user needs help with any form of technical writing — API docs, architecture docs, or operational runbooks.
112 other projects use a version of this, 4 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- thistleknot/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- juninmd/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ishandutta2007/Awesome-Claude-Skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- t128n/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Mehul72/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- DepressionCenter/agentprisetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use create-media-pack, project-preferences and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
DepressionCenterSkillcreate-media-pack
Create a coordinated project branding and media pack with three accessible design options, approved vector artwork, image exports, a branding guide, and README integration. Use when asked for a repository media pack, brand kit, or complete project visual identity.
Also in 5 projects that use this
DepressionCenterSkillproject-preferences
Apply repository-specific preferences when planning, implementing, or reviewing changes in this project.
Also in 6 projects that use this
thistleknotSkillresponse-style
Response and prose protocol. Use when drafting user-facing prose, expanding a user's ideas, or tuning tone and format to preserve voice, avoid AI cliches, and maintain coherent answers.
Also in 7 projects that use this
BrowserWorksSkillaccessibility-frontend-review
Performs an accessibility code review of a local diff or Phabricator revision in the style of the Firefox accessibility team. Use this skill whenever the user asks to review a Phabricator patch or revision for accessibility issues, mentions a D-number (like D284142) in the context of accessibility review, asks "does this patch have any a11y issues", or wants to check a diff against accessibility guidelines. Also use it when the user says things like "can you review this for a11y", "check this patch", or "give me an accessibility review of D[number]". Invoke proactively when the user pastes a phabricator.services.mozilla.com URL or shares a revision ID alongside any accessibility concern. Invoke when questions about the following topics are raised: aria properties, aria roles, high contrast mode, forced colors, prefers contrast, focus order, screen readers, assistive technology.
Also in 4 projects that use this
BrowserWorksSkillandroid-new-module
Guide for creating new Android gradle modules in the android-components project.
Also in 4 projects that use this
- +7 more from BrowserWorks
Other versions112 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 4
- anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins★ 35k20% same
- edu6565/claude-skills★ 020% same
- InfiniteRoomLabs/agent-ops★ 019% same
- KevinReactiv8/claude-skills★ 020% same
Wrote their own version · 108
- comet-ml/opik★ 23ksame name
- mozilla-firefox/firefox★ 14ksame name
- microsoft/fast★ 9.7ksame name
- mufeedvh/code2prompt★ 7.8ksame name
- BrowserWorks/waterfox★ 6.4ksame name
- samchon/typia★ 6ksame name
- github/gh-aw★ 5.6ksame name
- epicenter-md/epicenter★ 4.8ksame name
- EpicenterHQ/epicenter★ 4.8ksame name
- samchon/nestia★ 2.2ksame name
98 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository164 other files it gives its agents.
- instrument-data-to-allotropeSkill
- literature-reviewSkill
- nextflow-developmentSkill
- scientific-problem-selectionSkill
- scvi-toolsSkill
- single-cell-rna-qcSkill
- discover-brandSkill
- enforce-voiceSkill
- generate-guidelinesSkill
- csat-reportSkill
- customer-escalationSkill
- customer-researchSkill
- draft-responseSkill
- kb-articleSkill
- sentiment-analysisSkill
- ticket-triageSkill
- analyzeSkill
- build-dashboardSkill
- create-vizSkill
- data-context-extractorSkill
- data-modelingSkill
- data-pipelineSkill
- etl-designSkill
- explore-dataSkill
- sql-queriesSkill
- statistical-analysisSkill
- validate-dataSkill
- write-querySkill
- accessibility-reviewSkill
- component-librarySkill
- design-critiqueSkill
- design-handoffSkill
- design-systemSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- research-synthesisSkill
- user-researchSkill
- ux-copySkill
- wireframingSkill
- Agent DevelopmentSkill
- CLAUDE.md ManagementSkill
- MCP Server BuilderSkill
- Plugin DevelopmentSkill
- Prompt EngineeringSkill
- Skill CreatorSkill
- curriculum-designSkill
- lesson-planningSkill
- quiz-generatorSkill
- study-guideSkill
- tutoringSkill
- api-designSkill
- architectureSkill
- ci-cd-pipelineSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- database-migrationSkill
- debugSkill
- dependency-auditSkill
- deploy-checklistSkill
- error-handlingSkill
- git-workflowSkill
- incident-responseSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
22 rules. 0 are common, 21 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 101 edited versions we read keep these.
21
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 27
Write clear, accurate, and maintainable technical documentation.
- Distinctive: line 47
Read the codebase to extract accurate information:
- Distinctive: line 69
Read the actual code to ensure documentation accuracy.
- Distinctive: line 70
Check for existing docs that should be updated rather than duplicated.
- Distinctive: line 71
Look at tests for usage examples.
- Distinctive: line 72
Check git history for recent changes if updating existing docs.
- Distinctive: line 76
Follow the format template for the chosen document type (see Output Format section).
- Distinctive: line 78
Structure: Use headers, lists, and tables to make content scannable.
- Distinctive: line 80
Accuracy: Every code example must work.
- Distinctive: line 88
Verify code examples by reading the actual source.
- Distinctive: line 89
Ensure install/setup instructions match the current project state.
- Distinctive: line 90
Check that links and references point to real files.
- Very specific: line 205
Action: Read package.json/pyproject.toml for project info, scan src/ for structure, check for existing setup scripts, and write a complete …
- Distinctive: line 211
Action: Ask about the database setup, document the exact commands for failover, include verification steps after each action, and add …
- Distinctive: line 214
Action: Document local setup, key architectural concepts, important services, common workflows, where to find things, and who to ask for …
- Distinctive: line 218
Write for your reader, not for yourself.
- Distinctive: line 219
Every code example must be tested or verified against the actual codebase.
- Distinctive: line 220
Use consistent terminology.
- Distinctive: line 221
Put the most important information first.
- Distinctive: line 223
Prefer examples over explanations.
- Distinctive: line 224
Keep runbooks copy-paste ready.
- Distinctive: line 225
Use links instead of duplication.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 101 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Technical Documentation
Write clear, accurate, and maintainable technical documentation. Adapt style and depth to the document type and audience.
Workflow
Step 1: Determine Document Type and Audience
Identify what kind of documentation is needed:
| Type | Audience | Purpose |
| README | New contributors | Orient, install, run, contribute |
| API Documentation | Integration developers | Understand endpoints, auth, data formats |
| Runbook | On-call engineers | Respond to incidents, perform operations |
| Onboarding Guide | New team members | Get productive quickly |
| Architecture Doc | Engineers | Understand system design and data flow |
| Changelog | Users and developers | Track what changed between versions |
| ADR | Future engineers | Understand why decisions were made |
Step 2: Gather Source Material
Read the codebase to extract accurate information:
# Understand project structure
ls -la
find . -name "*.md" -not -path "*/node_modules/*" | head -20
# Check for existing docs
cat README.md 2>/dev/null
ls docs/ 2>/dev/null
# For API docs: find route definitions
grep -rn "router\.\|app\.\(get\|post\|put\|delete\)" --include="*.ts" --include="*.js" src/
# or for Python
grep -rn "@app\.\(route\|get\|post\|put\|delete\)" --include="*.py" .
# For architecture docs: understand dependencies
cat package.json 2>/dev/null | head -30
cat requirements.txt 2>/dev/null
cat docker-compose.yml 2>/dev/null- Read the actual code to ensure documentation accuracy.
- Check for existing docs that should be updated rather than duplicated.
- Look at tests for usage examples.
- Check git history for recent changes if updating existing docs.
Step 3: Write the Documentation
Follow the format template for the chosen document type (see Output Format section). Key principles:
Structure: Use headers, lists, and tables to make content scannable. Readers skim first, read second.
Accuracy: Every code example must work. Every command must be copy-pasteable. Wrong docs are worse than no docs.
Completeness: Cover happy path AND edge cases. Document error states, not just success states.
Conciseness: Say what needs to be said, then stop. Long docs go unread.
Step 4: Validate
- Verify code examples by reading the actual source.
- Ensure install/setup instructions match the current project state.
- Check that links and references point to real files.
- Confirm environment variable names match what the code actually reads.
Output Format Templates
README Template
# Project Name
One-line description of what this project does.
## Quick Start
Prerequisites, install, and run in under 60 seconds.
## Overview
2-3 paragraphs explaining the project's purpose, architecture, and key concepts.
## Installation
Step-by-step install instructions with exact commands.
## Usage
Common use cases with code examples.
## Configuration
Environment variables and config options in a table.
| Variable | Required | Default | Description |
|---------------|----------|---------|--------------------------|
| DATABASE_URL | Yes | - | PostgreSQL connection URL |
## Development
How to set up the dev environment, run tests, and contribute.
## API Reference
Brief API overview or link to full docs.
## Troubleshooting
Common issues and their solutions.API Documentation Template
# API Reference
## Authentication
How to authenticate. Include a working curl example.
## Endpoints
### POST /api/resource
Create a new resource.
**Request**
| Field | Type | Required | Description |
|---------|--------|----------|---------------------|
| name | string | yes | Name of the resource |
**Response** `201 Created`
```json
{ "id": "abc123", "name": "example" }Errors
| Status | Code | Description |
| 400 | VALIDATION_ERROR | Invalid input |
| 401 | UNAUTHORIZED | Missing or bad token |
### Runbook Template
```markdown
# Runbook: <Operation Name>
## Overview
What this runbook covers and when to use it.
## Prerequisites
- Access to <system>
- Permissions: <role>
## Procedure
### Step 1: <Action>
```bash
<exact command>Expected output: <what you should see>
If this fails: <what to do>
Step 2: <Action>
...
Rollback
How to undo this operation safely.
Escalation
When and how to escalate if the runbook doesn't resolve the issue.
## Examples
**User**: "Write a README for this project"
**Action**: Read package.json/pyproject.toml for project info, scan src/ for structure, check for existing setup scripts, and write a complete README with install, usage, and development sections.
**User**: "Document the API endpoints"
**Action**: Find all route definitions in the codebase, read request/response types, check middleware for auth requirements, and produce endpoint-by-endpoint documentation with examples.
**User**: "Write a runbook for database failover"
**Action**: Ask about the database setup, document the exact commands for failover, include verification steps after each action, and add rollback and escalation procedures.
**User**: "Create an onboarding guide for new backend engineers"
**Action**: Document local setup, key architectural concepts, important services, common workflows, where to find things, and who to ask for help.
## Best Practices
- Write for your reader, not for yourself. A README for external developers is different from an internal architecture doc.
- Every code example must be tested or verified against the actual codebase. Wrong examples erode trust in all documentation.
- Use consistent terminology. If the codebase calls it a "workspace," don't call it a "project" in the docs.
- Put the most important information first. Readers who need to skim should get the essentials from the first few sections.
- Date or version-stamp docs that are likely to become stale. "Last updated: 2024-01" helps readers judge currency.
- Prefer examples over explanations. Show, then explain if needed.
- Keep runbooks copy-paste ready. An on-call engineer at 3 AM should not have to interpret your prose.
- Use links instead of duplication. If something is documented elsewhere, link to it rather than copying it.
- Include a "Troubleshooting" or "FAQ" section for recurring questions. This reduces support load and helps future readers.Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

