draft-response
Skill1 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Draft a professional customer-facing response tailored to the situation and relationship. Use when answering a product question, responding to an escalation or outage, delivering bad news like a delay or won't-fix, declining a feature request, or replying to a frustrated customer. Trigger with "draft a response", "reply to this ticket", "help me respond", or "write a customer email".
3 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Big-LAORE/Biblioth-que-de-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- microsoft/aibast-agents-librarytheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- anthropics/knowledge-work-pluginstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 3
- anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins★ 35ksame name
- microsoft/aibast-agents-library★ 8same name
- Big-LAORE/Biblioth-que-de-skills★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository164 other files it gives its agents.
- instrument-data-to-allotropeSkill
- literature-reviewSkill
- nextflow-developmentSkill
- scientific-problem-selectionSkill
- scvi-toolsSkill
- single-cell-rna-qcSkill
- discover-brandSkill
- enforce-voiceSkill
- generate-guidelinesSkill
- csat-reportSkill
- customer-escalationSkill
- customer-researchSkill
- kb-articleSkill
- sentiment-analysisSkill
- ticket-triageSkill
- analyzeSkill
- build-dashboardSkill
- create-vizSkill
- data-context-extractorSkill
- data-modelingSkill
- data-pipelineSkill
- etl-designSkill
- explore-dataSkill
- sql-queriesSkill
- statistical-analysisSkill
- validate-dataSkill
- write-querySkill
- accessibility-reviewSkill
- component-librarySkill
- design-critiqueSkill
- design-handoffSkill
- design-systemSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- research-synthesisSkill
- user-researchSkill
- ux-copySkill
- wireframingSkill
- Agent DevelopmentSkill
- CLAUDE.md ManagementSkill
- MCP Server BuilderSkill
- Plugin DevelopmentSkill
- Prompt EngineeringSkill
- Skill CreatorSkill
- curriculum-designSkill
- lesson-planningSkill
- quiz-generatorSkill
- study-guideSkill
- tutoringSkill
- api-designSkill
- architectureSkill
- ci-cd-pipelineSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- database-migrationSkill
- debugSkill
- dependency-auditSkill
- deploy-checklistSkill
- documentationSkill
- error-handlingSkill
- git-workflowSkill
- incident-responseSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.
10
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 31
Read the customer's message and classify the situation:
- Distinctive: line 43
Knowledge base: Search for relevant articles, docs, or FAQs.
- Distinctive: line 44
Known issues: Check bug trackers or incident dashboards for related problems.
- Distinctive: line 64
Write the response following the selected framework.
- Distinctive: line 90
Action: Check for known performance issues, draft a response acknowledging the experience, explain the cause if known, provide a workaround …
- Distinctive: line 96
Action: Write a concise status update with current impact, root cause summary, remediation steps taken, and next update time.
- Distinctive: line 104
Never blame the customer, even indirectly.
- Distinctive: line 106
Avoid jargon. Translate internal terms into customer-friendly language.
- Distinctive: line 109
If the response involves a commitment (timeline, refund, follow-up), note it in internal tracking.
- Distinctive: line 110
Read the draft aloud to catch tone issues -- written words often sound harsher than intended.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Draft Customer Response
Draft a customer-facing response that is accurate, empathetic, and actionable. Adapt tone and structure to the situation type -- product questions, outage updates, bad news delivery, or feature declines.
Workflow
Step 1: Analyze the Inbound Message
Read the customer's message and classify the situation:
- Situation type: Product question, bug report, outage inquiry, feature request, complaint, billing issue, account change.
- Sentiment: Frustrated, neutral, confused, urgent, appreciative.
- Complexity: Simple lookup vs. multi-part question vs. sensitive issue.
- Relationship signals: Account tier, prior interactions, escalation history.
- Implicit questions: What the customer is really asking beyond the literal words.
Step 2: Research the Answer
Gather the information needed to respond accurately:
- Knowledge base: Search for relevant articles, docs, or FAQs.
- Known issues: Check bug trackers or incident dashboards for related problems.
- Account context: Subscription tier, feature entitlements, recent changes.
- Prior communication: What has already been said to this customer about this topic.
- Internal notes: Engineering updates, product decisions, timeline commitments.
Step 3: Select the Response Framework
Choose the appropriate structure for the situation:
| Situation | Framework |
| Product question | Acknowledge, Answer, Offer next steps |
| Bug report | Validate, Status update, Workaround if available, Timeline |
| Outage update | Status, Impact, Actions taken, Next update time |
| Bad news | Empathize, Explain reasoning, Offer alternative, Commit to follow-up |
| Feature decline | Thank, Explain why not now, Share what is planned, Invite feedback |
| Frustrated customer | Acknowledge feeling, Take ownership, Concrete resolution, Prevention |
Step 4: Draft the Response
Write the response following the selected framework. Adjust formality and length to match the channel (email, chat, ticket comment).
Output Format
## Draft Response
**Situation**: <type>
**Tone**: <empathetic / formal / casual / urgent>
**Channel**: <email / chat / ticket>
---
<Full draft response text>
---
**Internal Notes**
- Sources used: <KB articles, bug tickets, docs referenced>
- Follow-up needed: <any commitments made that require tracking>
- Escalation flag: <yes/no -- does this need manager review before sending?>Examples
User: "Customer asks why their dashboard is loading slowly since last week" Action: Check for known performance issues, draft a response acknowledging the experience, explain the cause if known, provide a workaround and timeline.
User: "Customer requested Slack integration, we're not building it" Action: Draft a feature decline response that thanks the customer, explains prioritization reasoning without being dismissive, and points to the existing webhook alternative.
User: "Draft an outage update for the email delivery delay" Action: Write a concise status update with current impact, root cause summary, remediation steps taken, and next update time.
User: "Customer is angry about being charged after cancellation" Action: Draft an empathetic response acknowledging the billing error, confirming the refund, and explaining what steps have been taken to prevent recurrence.
Best Practices
- Open by acknowledging the customer's experience before jumping to the solution.
- Never blame the customer, even indirectly. Phrases like "as noted in our docs" read as condescending.
- Be specific about timelines. "We'll look into it" is less reassuring than "Our team is investigating and I'll update you by Thursday."
- Avoid jargon. Translate internal terms into customer-friendly language.
- For bad news, lead with empathy and explain the reasoning -- customers accept "no" better when they understand why.
- End with a clear next step: what you will do, what the customer should do, or when they will hear back.
- If the response involves a commitment (timeline, refund, follow-up), note it in internal tracking.
- Read the draft aloud to catch tone issues -- written words often sound harsher than intended.
- For complex issues, break the response into numbered steps rather than dense paragraphs.
- Match the customer's communication style. A casual customer gets a casual reply; a formal enterprise contact gets polished prose.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

