customer-escalation
Skill1 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Package an escalation for engineering, product, or leadership with full context. Use when a bug needs engineering attention beyond normal support, multiple customers report the same issue, a customer is threatening to churn, or an issue has sat unresolved past SLA. Trigger with "escalate this", "loop in engineering", "this needs product attention", or "prepare an escalation".
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Big-LAORE/Biblioth-que-de-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- anthropics/knowledge-work-pluginstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins★ 35ksame name
- Big-LAORE/Biblioth-que-de-skills★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository164 other files it gives its agents.
- instrument-data-to-allotropeSkill
- literature-reviewSkill
- nextflow-developmentSkill
- scientific-problem-selectionSkill
- scvi-toolsSkill
- single-cell-rna-qcSkill
- discover-brandSkill
- enforce-voiceSkill
- generate-guidelinesSkill
- csat-reportSkill
- customer-researchSkill
- draft-responseSkill
- kb-articleSkill
- sentiment-analysisSkill
- ticket-triageSkill
- analyzeSkill
- build-dashboardSkill
- create-vizSkill
- data-context-extractorSkill
- data-modelingSkill
- data-pipelineSkill
- etl-designSkill
- explore-dataSkill
- sql-queriesSkill
- statistical-analysisSkill
- validate-dataSkill
- write-querySkill
- accessibility-reviewSkill
- component-librarySkill
- design-critiqueSkill
- design-handoffSkill
- design-systemSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- research-synthesisSkill
- user-researchSkill
- ux-copySkill
- wireframingSkill
- Agent DevelopmentSkill
- CLAUDE.md ManagementSkill
- MCP Server BuilderSkill
- Plugin DevelopmentSkill
- Prompt EngineeringSkill
- Skill CreatorSkill
- curriculum-designSkill
- lesson-planningSkill
- quiz-generatorSkill
- study-guideSkill
- tutoringSkill
- api-designSkill
- architectureSkill
- ci-cd-pipelineSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- database-migrationSkill
- debugSkill
- dependency-auditSkill
- deploy-checklistSkill
- documentationSkill
- error-handlingSkill
- git-workflowSkill
- incident-responseSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈6
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 33
Ticket details: Read the ticket thread, including customer messages and internal notes.
- Distinctive: line 36
Scope assessment: Check whether other customers have reported the same or similar problems.
- Distinctive: line 37
Timeline: When the issue was first reported, how long it has been open, SLA status.
- Distinctive: line 62
Document clear, testable reproduction steps:
- Distinctive: line 131
If multiple customers are affected, include the count and name the largest accounts.
- Distinctive: line 132
Update the escalation when new information arrives rather than sending separate follow-ups.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Customer Escalation
Package a support escalation with full context so the receiving team can act without back-and-forth. Includes customer impact, reproduction steps, urgency classification, and recommended action.
Workflow
Step 1: Gather Context
Collect all relevant information about the issue:
- Ticket details: Read the ticket thread, including customer messages and internal notes.
- Customer profile: Account tier, ARR, contract renewal date, open opportunities.
- Issue history: Previous tickets for the same issue, related bugs, known workarounds.
- Scope assessment: Check whether other customers have reported the same or similar problems.
- Timeline: When the issue was first reported, how long it has been open, SLA status.
Step 2: Assess Impact
Evaluate the business and technical impact:
- Customer impact: Number of affected users, revenue at risk, workflow disruption severity.
- Breadth: Single customer vs. multiple accounts vs. platform-wide.
- Workaround availability: Is there a viable temporary fix or is the customer fully blocked?
- Churn risk: Explicit threats, sentiment trajectory, renewal proximity.
- Contractual obligations: SLA commitments, uptime guarantees, escalation clauses.
Step 3: Classify Urgency
Assign urgency based on a standard framework:
| Level | Criteria | Response Target |
| P1 - Critical | Production down, data loss, no workaround, security breach | 1 hour |
| P2 - High | Major feature broken, workaround painful, key account impacted | 4 hours |
| P3 - Medium | Feature degraded, workaround exists, moderate impact | 1 business day |
| P4 - Low | Minor inconvenience, cosmetic, enhancement request | Next sprint |
Step 4: Build Reproduction Steps
Document clear, testable reproduction steps:
- Environment details (browser, OS, API version, tenant ID).
- Step-by-step instructions to trigger the issue.
- Expected vs. actual behavior.
- Attach screenshots, logs, HAR files, or error traces when available.
- Note any conditions that make the issue intermittent.
Step 5: Draft the Escalation
Compose the escalation document for the target team.
Output Format
## Escalation: <Issue Title>
**Urgency**: P1 / P2 / P3 / P4
**Target Team**: Engineering / Product / Leadership
**Ticket**: <ID or URL>
**Escalated By**: <agent name>
**Date**: <today>
### Customer Context
- **Account**: <company name> | <tier> | $<ARR>
- **Contact**: <name, role>
- **Renewal**: <date> | **Churn Risk**: Low / Medium / High
- **Open Since**: <date> | **SLA Status**: Within / Breached
### Issue Summary
<2-3 sentence description of the problem and its business impact>
### Reproduction Steps
1. <step>
2. <step>
3. <step>
- **Expected**: <what should happen>
- **Actual**: <what happens instead>
- **Environment**: <browser, OS, version, tenant>
### Impact Assessment
- **Affected customers**: <count or "single account">
- **Revenue at risk**: $<amount>
- **Workaround**: <available / partial / none>
### Recommended Action
<specific ask: fix, investigate, prioritize, executive outreach>
### Supporting Evidence
- <links to logs, screenshots, related tickets>Examples
User: "Escalate ticket #4521 to engineering -- the customer's data export has been broken for a week" Action: Pull ticket details, assess impact, classify as P2, build reproduction steps from the thread, draft escalation to engineering.
User: "Three customers reported the same SSO login failure today, loop in engineering" Action: Cross-reference all three tickets, identify the common pattern, classify as P1 due to breadth, package a consolidated escalation.
User: "Acme Corp is threatening to cancel, prepare an escalation for leadership" Action: Pull account profile, compile issue history, calculate revenue at risk, draft executive-level escalation with churn risk framing.
Best Practices
- Lead with impact, not symptoms. Engineering and leadership prioritize based on business consequence.
- Include reproduction steps even if the issue seems obvious. Teams in different contexts need them.
- Link to related tickets rather than summarizing them at length to keep the escalation scannable.
- State the specific ask clearly. "Please investigate" is weaker than "Please reproduce and provide an ETA for a fix by Friday."
- If multiple customers are affected, include the count and name the largest accounts.
- Update the escalation when new information arrives rather than sending separate follow-ups.
- Track escalation outcomes to refine urgency calibration over time.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

