sentiment-analysis
Skill1 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Analyze customer sentiment from tickets, reviews, NPS responses, or feedback channels. Identify trends, pain points, and satisfaction drivers. Use when preparing voice-of-customer reports, investigating a drop in CSAT or NPS, understanding common complaints, or quantifying customer happiness. Trigger with "analyze sentiment", "what are customers saying", "voice of customer", or "sentiment trends".
19 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- yuusakuri/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- vijaysuperpositionist/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- daviszhen/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- microsoft/aibast-agents-librarytheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- IngAs8/ClaudeSkilltheir own version, first seen Sep 28, 2026
- databricks-solutions/genie-code-skills-demotheir own version, first seen Sep 15, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use mean-reversion, position-sizing and 1 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
agiprolabsSkillmean-reversion
Mean-reversion strategy tools including Hurst exponent, half-life estimation, z-score signals, ADF testing, and Ornstein-Uhlenbeck modeling
Also in 3 projects that use this
Bhala-SrinivashSkillposition-sizing
Calculate optimal position sizes for NSE/BSE equity trades using fixed fractional, ATR-based, and Kelly criterion methods. Includes portfolio constraints and leverage adjustments.
Also in 3 projects that use this
vivy-yiSkillrisk-management
内容风险管控 - 预防、识别和应对账号运营中的各类风险
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions19 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 19
- agiprolabs/claude-trading-skills★ 366same name
- SKE-Labs/agent-trading-skills★ 17same name
- brainbytes-dev/everything-claude-trading★ 16same name
- databricks-solutions/genie-code-skills-demo★ 15same name
- ishenli/investment-agent★ 10same name
- microsoft/aibast-agents-library★ 8same name
- Adhamxon/claude-code-skills★ 2same name
- skytiger6724/qwen-skills★ 2same name
- yuusakuri/agent-skills★ 2same name
- BryceYuuu/open-workflow-skills★ 1same name
9 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository164 other files it gives its agents.
- instrument-data-to-allotropeSkill
- literature-reviewSkill
- nextflow-developmentSkill
- scientific-problem-selectionSkill
- scvi-toolsSkill
- single-cell-rna-qcSkill
- discover-brandSkill
- enforce-voiceSkill
- generate-guidelinesSkill
- csat-reportSkill
- customer-escalationSkill
- customer-researchSkill
- draft-responseSkill
- kb-articleSkill
- ticket-triageSkill
- analyzeSkill
- build-dashboardSkill
- create-vizSkill
- data-context-extractorSkill
- data-modelingSkill
- data-pipelineSkill
- etl-designSkill
- explore-dataSkill
- sql-queriesSkill
- statistical-analysisSkill
- validate-dataSkill
- write-querySkill
- accessibility-reviewSkill
- component-librarySkill
- design-critiqueSkill
- design-handoffSkill
- design-systemSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- research-synthesisSkill
- user-researchSkill
- ux-copySkill
- wireframingSkill
- Agent DevelopmentSkill
- CLAUDE.md ManagementSkill
- MCP Server BuilderSkill
- Plugin DevelopmentSkill
- Prompt EngineeringSkill
- Skill CreatorSkill
- curriculum-designSkill
- lesson-planningSkill
- quiz-generatorSkill
- study-guideSkill
- tutoringSkill
- api-designSkill
- architectureSkill
- ci-cd-pipelineSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- database-migrationSkill
- debugSkill
- dependency-auditSkill
- deploy-checklistSkill
- documentationSkill
- error-handlingSkill
- git-workflowSkill
- incident-responseSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 14 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 36
Deduplication: Remove duplicate entries from the same customer about the same event.
- Distinctive: line 62
Look at sentiment movement over time:
- Distinctive: line 123
Action: Search tickets and feedback tagged with onboarding, classify sentiment, compare to pre-launch baseline, report findings.
- Distinctive: line 130
Use representative quotes to make themes tangible, but never let quotes substitute for quantified patterns.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 14 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Sentiment Analysis
Analyze customer sentiment across tickets, reviews, NPS responses, and feedback channels. Surface trends, pain points, and satisfaction drivers with quantified evidence.
Workflow
Step 1: Ingest and Normalize Data
Prepare the input data for analysis:
- Format identification: Detect whether input is CSV, JSON, pasted text, or ticket export.
- Field mapping: Identify the text field (comment, description, body), timestamp, customer ID, and any existing scores.
- Deduplication: Remove duplicate entries from the same customer about the same event.
- Time filtering: Apply the requested period filter if specified.
- Volume check: Note total volume and warn if the sample is too small for reliable trends.
Step 2: Classify Sentiment
Score each piece of feedback:
- Polarity: Positive, negative, neutral, or mixed.
- Intensity: Strong, moderate, or mild (e.g., "frustrated" vs. "slightly annoyed").
- Emotion tags: Specific emotions detected -- angry, confused, delighted, anxious, disappointed, grateful.
- Topic extraction: What feature, process, or interaction the sentiment is about.
- Actionability: Whether the feedback points to something the team can change.
Step 3: Identify Themes
Group individual feedback into patterns:
- Pain points: Recurring negative themes ranked by frequency and intensity.
- Satisfaction drivers: What customers consistently praise.
- Emerging issues: New complaints that were not present in prior periods.
- Resolved issues: Complaints that have decreased since the last analysis.
- Feature-level sentiment: Sentiment breakdown by product area.
Step 4: Analyze Trends
Look at sentiment movement over time:
- Overall trajectory: Is sentiment improving, declining, or stable?
- Inflection points: Dates where sentiment shifted, correlated with releases, incidents, or changes.
- Segment differences: Sentiment by customer tier, region, or use case.
- Volume trends: Are more customers leaving feedback? Fewer? Is silence meaningful?
Step 5: Generate Insights
Translate patterns into actionable recommendations.
Output Format
## Sentiment Analysis Report
**Period**: <date range>
**Sources**: <ticket system, NPS, reviews, etc.>
**Volume**: <total feedback items analyzed>
### Overall Sentiment
- **Positive**: <percentage>
- **Neutral**: <percentage>
- **Negative**: <percentage>
- **Trend**: Improving / Declining / Stable vs. prior period
### Top Pain Points (by frequency)
| Rank | Theme | Mentions | Intensity | Example Quote |
|------|-------|----------|-----------|---------------|
| 1 | <theme> | <count> | High/Med/Low | "<short quote>" |
| 2 | <theme> | <count> | High/Med/Low | "<short quote>" |
| 3 | <theme> | <count> | High/Med/Low | "<short quote>" |
### Satisfaction Drivers
| Rank | Theme | Mentions | Example Quote |
|------|-------|----------|---------------|
| 1 | <theme> | <count> | "<short quote>" |
| 2 | <theme> | <count> | "<short quote>" |
### Emerging Issues
- <new pattern not seen in prior periods>
### Sentiment by Product Area
| Area | Positive | Neutral | Negative | Change |
|------|----------|---------|----------|--------|
| <area> | <pct> | <pct> | <pct> | +/-<pct> |
### Recommendations
1. <actionable recommendation tied to a pain point>
2. <actionable recommendation tied to a pain point>
3. <opportunity to amplify a satisfaction driver>Examples
User: "Analyze sentiment from last month's NPS responses" Action: Parse NPS comments, classify sentiment and themes, identify top detractor drivers and promoter reasons, produce a trends report.
User: "What are customers saying about the new onboarding flow?" Action: Search tickets and feedback tagged with onboarding, classify sentiment, compare to pre-launch baseline, report findings.
User: "Pull a voice-of-customer report for the Q1 board deck" Action: Aggregate all Q1 feedback sources, quantify sentiment distribution, highlight top themes with quotes, and format for executive consumption.
Best Practices
- Use representative quotes to make themes tangible, but never let quotes substitute for quantified patterns.
- Compare to a prior period. "65% positive" is meaningless without knowing it was 72% last month.
- Separate signal from noise. A single angry review is not a trend; five customers mentioning the same bug is.
- Note sample size and source bias. NPS respondents skew toward strong opinions; ticket data skews negative.
- Correlate sentiment shifts with known events (releases, incidents, pricing changes) to explain causality.
- Flag emerging issues early even if volume is low. A new complaint pattern is more actionable than a chronic one.
- Present negative findings constructively. Frame pain points as opportunities with clear recommendations.
- Segment results when possible. Enterprise sentiment may differ substantially from self-serve.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

