regression-testing
Skill1 starsChanged 53 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when validating that recent changes haven't broken existing functionality — building/running regression suites, deciding regression scope for a release, and impact analysis from a diff/changelog.
8 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- upex-galaxy/agentic-qa-boilerplatetheir own version, first seen Nov 7, 2026
- proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qetheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- fishzjp/qa-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 21, 2026
- SoftBlack42/StarPietheir own version, first seen Oct 9, 2026
- nahid-sparktales/agent-dispatchertheir own version, first seen Sep 21, 2026
- IrMaho/TeleDOMtheir own version, first seen Sep 11, 2026
Other versions8 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- mejbaurbahar/fagun★ 114% same
Wrote their own version · 7
- SoftBlack42/StarPie★ 1.3ksame name
- proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe★ 524same name
- fishzjp/qa-skills★ 62same name
- nahid-sparktales/agent-dispatcher★ 59same name
- upex-galaxy/agentic-qa-boilerplate★ 26same name
- IrMaho/TeleDOM★ 10same name
- Victoriakaey/build-reliable-agents★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository98 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- 42crunch-api-security-testingSkill
- a-b-testingSkill
- acceptance-testingSkill
- accessibility-testingSkill
- ai-agent-evaluationSkill
- ai-code-securitySkill
- ai-ml-testingSkill
- analytics-tracking-testingSkill
- api-testingSkill
- authn-authz-testingSkill
- autonomous-qa-orchestrationSkill
- bdd-gherkin-testingSkill
- blockchain-smart-contract-testingSkill
- bug-reportingSkill
- chaos-resilience-testingSkill
- chatbot-voice-agent-testingSkill
- cicd-testingSkill
- cli-testingSkill
- cloud-infrastructure-testingSkill
- code-coverage-analysisSkill
- compatibility-testingSkill
- compliance-testingSkill
- concurrency-race-condition-testingSkill
- configuration-feature-flag-testingSkill
- contract-testingSkill
- cross-browser-testingSkill
- database-testingSkill
- data-migration-testingSkill
- data-pipeline-etl-testingSkill
- date-time-timezone-testingSkill
- desktop-app-testingSkill
- disaster-recovery-backup-testingSkill
- e2e-testingSkill
- email-notification-testingSkill
- event-driven-messaging-testingSkill
- exploratory-testingSkill
- flaky-test-managementSkill
- functional-testingSkill
- fuzz-testingSkill
- game-testingSkill
- graphql-testingSkill
- iac-container-security-testingSkill
- installation-upgrade-testingSkill
- integration-testingSkill
- iot-embedded-testingSkill
- llm-security-auditSkill
- llm-testingSkill
- localization-testingSkill
- manual-testingSkill
- mcp-testingSkill
- memory-leak-resource-testingSkill
- microservices-testingSkill
- mobile-testingSkill
- mutation-testingSkill
- observability-testingSkill
- payment-ecommerce-testingSkill
- performance-testingSkill
- production-monitoring-synthetic-testingSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 7 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 19
Full regression: only for major releases, schema migrations, or upgrades of shared infrastructure (framework, ORM, auth library).
- Distinctive: line 41
Shared components/design system: every consumer, not just the one that triggered the change.
- Distinctive: line 43
Dependency upgrades: read the changelog for breaking changes.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 7 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Regression Testing
Regression testing proves that what worked before still works after a change. The craft is choosing enough tests, fast, without re-running the world every time.
1. Scope by change impact
- Diff-driven: what files/modules changed? Trace consumers: shared components, API endpoints, DB tables/migrations, feature flags, configs.
- Always-run core (the floor): login/auth, checkout/payment or your business "money path", data export/import: run every release regardless of the diff.
- Risk-weight the rest: likelihood of breakage (size and complexity of change, code churn, past defects) × impact (users, revenue, safety).
- Full regression only for major releases, schema migrations, or upgrades of shared infrastructure (framework, ORM, auth library).
2. Automate test selection
jest --changedSince=origin/main # JS: tests related to changed files
pytest --picked=branch # pytest-picked; or pytest-testmon: pytest --testmon
nx affected -t test / turbo run test --filter=...[origin/main] # monorepos
git diff --name-only origin/main...HEAD | xargs -n1 ./map-to-tests.sh # custom mapping via tags/ownersTag tests by feature and risk (@checkout @auth @smoke @p0) so partial runs are one flag away. Predictive selection tools (e.g. Launchable) learn from history when the suite is large.
3. Suite tiers
| Tier | When | Budget | Contents |
| Smoke | every commit/PR | < 5 min | critical paths (smoke-sanity-testing) |
| Targeted | every PR | < 15 min | tests mapped to the change + core floor |
| Full | nightly / pre-release | hours | everything, incl. slower E2E and cross-browser |
| Extended | release candidate | as needed | perf baseline, security scan, migration rehearsal |
Promote a manual/exploratory flow to automation after it has been run manually 2–3 times and is stable (test-automation). Every fixed production bug gets a regression test that fails without the fix.
4. Regression sources to re-check on purpose
- Shared components/design system: every consumer, not just the one that triggered the change.
- Migrations: new-record behavior and legacy rows (old data without new columns), rollback path (
data-migration-testing). - Dependency upgrades: read the changelog for breaking changes; passing tests may not cover the changed behavior.
- Config/flags: flag-on and flag-off both work (
configuration-feature-flag-testing). - Cross-cutting: auth, permissions, caching, i18n, time zones, feature interactions, integrations and webhooks.
- Non-functional drift: performance vs baseline, bundle size, accessibility, visual diffs (
visual-testing).
5. Triage a failing regression test
- Re-run once to rule out flakiness (
flaky-test-management); never file a flake as a regression. - Bisect to the culprit:
git bisect run ./run-one-test.sh, or compare with the last known-good deploy/build. - Decide: product bug / intended change (update the test with justification) / test bug / environment.
- File with the introducing commit/PR when known (
bug-reporting); it is the most useful fact for a fast fix.
6. Measure
Regression escape rate (bugs found in prod that an existing test should have caught) · suite duration and flake rate · % of defects that produced a new test · diff coverage on changed lines (code-coverage-analysis). Prune tests that never fail and duplicate others; keep the suite fast enough that people run it.
Related
smoke-sanity-testing, test-automation, flaky-test-management, release-readiness-testing, code-coverage-analysis, bug-reporting
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

