agentleFS
mejbaurbaharmejbaurbahar/software-tester-skills/skills/exploratory-testing/SKILL.md

exploratory-testing

Skill1 starsChanged 52 days agoMITView on GitHub

Use when conducting exploratory testing, unscripted bug hunting, and session-based test management — test charters, heuristics (SFDIPOT, Tours), timeboxed sessions, and exploratory debriefing.

11 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use test-strategy.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • jarosser06Skill

    test-strategy

    Plans pytest test strategies for Drift's 90%+ coverage requirement using coverage analysis, edge case identification, and test suite design. Use when determining what tests to write, analyzing coverage gaps, or planning test strategies.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 9 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 2

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Time: When does timing matter? (Timeouts, race conditions, concurrency, timezones)

    line 32
  2. Distinctive:

    The Guidebook Tour: Follow user documentation step-by-step.

    line 35

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 9 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Exploratory Testing

Overview

Exploratory testing is simultaneous learning, test design, and test execution. It discovers edge-case bugs, usability flaws, and unexpected state combinations that predefined automated tests miss.

Session-Based Test Management (SBTM)

Conduct exploratory testing in structured, timeboxed sessions (45-90 minutes):

  1. Charter: Clear scope defining what to explore, with what tools, to discover what risks.
    • Formula: Explore [target/feature] with [tools/data/methods] to discover [risks/vulnerabilities/bugs].
  2. Timebox: Focus strictly on the charter without distractions.
  3. Session Notes: Log bugs found, areas covered, questions raised, and test ideas.
  4. Debrief: Review findings with developers or product managers.

Proven Exploratory Heuristics

SFDIPOT (San Francisco Depot)

  • Structure: What is the application made of? (Files, modules, dependencies)
  • Function: What does the software do? (Features, calculations, transformations)
  • Data: What does it process? (Inputs, outputs, boundary values, corrupted data)
  • Interfaces: How does it interact? (UI, APIs, CLI, webhooks, exports)
  • Platform: What does it rely on? (OS, browser, hardware, network speed)
  • Operations: How is it used? (User personas, unusual habits, peak usage)
  • Time: When does timing matter? (Timeouts, race conditions, concurrency, timezones)

Testing Tours

  • The Guidebook Tour: Follow user documentation step-by-step; verify reality matches docs.
  • The Saboteur Tour: Deliberately disrupt inputs, kill network connections mid-request, supply malformed payloads.
  • The Supermodel Tour: Focus entirely on visual layout, aesthetics, typography, alignment, and responsiveness.
  • The Intellectual Tour: Stress the system with complex, highly intricate workflows and heavy calculations.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.