agentleFS
mejbaurbaharmejbaurbahar/software-tester-skills/skills/concurrency-race-condition-testing/SKILL.md

concurrency-race-condition-testing

Skill1 starsChanged 54 days agoMITView on GitHub

Use when testing thread-safety, race conditions, deadlocks, double-submit, idempotency, optimistic/pessimistic locking, async ordering bugs, and flaky concurrency failures — with TSan, go -race, stress loops, barrier-based harnesses and parallel API calls.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈0

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Isolation: no dirty/non-repeatable/phantom reads at the level you claim (READ COMMITTED vs SERIALIZABLE).

    line 48

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Concurrency & Race-Condition Testing

Races don't fail on demand. You must force interleavings and detect violations.

Bug catalog (what to hunt)

Lost update (read-modify-write) · double spend / oversell (check-then-act) · duplicate submit / retry storms · deadlock (lock ordering) · livelock/starvation · stale cache after write · non-atomic multi-step DB ops · async callbacks out of order · TOCTOU file/permission checks · unsafe shared state in singletons · connection/thread-pool exhaustion.

Detection tools

StackTool
Gogo test -race -count=100 ./...
C/C++/RustThreadSanitizer (-fsanitize=thread), loom (Rust)
Javajcstress, -XX:+..., Thread dumps, jstack deadlock detection
Pythonpytest-xdist, threading.Barrier, asyncio.gather stress
JS/TSPromise.all bursts, jest --runInBand vs parallel diff
DBTwo sessions + pg_sleep/SLEEP() to widen windows; isolation-level tests
Systemstress-ng, k6/Locust with identical concurrent requests

Force the interleaving

# Fire N identical requests at the same instant (double-spend probe)
import threading, requests
N = 20; barrier = threading.Barrier(N); results = []
def hit():
    barrier.wait()
    results.append(requests.post(URL, json={"coupon":"ONCE"}, headers=H).status_code)
ts = [threading.Thread(target=hit) for _ in range(N)]
[t.start() for t in ts]; [t.join() for t in ts]
assert results.count(200) == 1, results       # coupon must apply exactly once
# bash/curl burst against an idempotent endpoint
seq 1 20 | xargs -P20 -I{} curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}\n" -X POST -H "Idempotency-Key: k1" $URL | sort | uniq -c

What to assert

  • Exactly-once: inventory never < 0; balance conserved; one row per idempotency key; unique constraints hold.
  • Isolation: no dirty/non-repeatable/phantom reads at the level you claim (READ COMMITTED vs SERIALIZABLE).
  • Liveness: operations finish under contention (timeouts, no deadlock); lock timeouts surface clean errors.
  • Ordering: events processed in key order; consumers tolerate redelivery.

Fix patterns to recommend

Atomic SQL (UPDATE … SET qty = qty-1 WHERE qty>0) · optimistic locking (version column/ETag If-Match) · unique constraints + idempotency keys · advisory locks/SELECT … FOR UPDATE · consistent lock ordering · queue partitioning by key · immutable data.

Reporting

Include seed/iteration count, concurrency level, exact interleaving/log lines, and expected vs observed invariant. Rate by blast radius (money/data loss = Sev1).

Related

api-testing, database-testing, flaky-test-management, chaos-resilience-testing, event-driven-messaging-testing

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.