regression-testing
Skill1.3k starsChanged 12 days agoMITView on GitHub
Design and run StarPie regression verification tied to the exact candidate, including Release builds, plugin self-tests, static guards, UIA boundaries, mutation checks, and human acceptance. Use after implementation or when strengthening tests.
8 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- upex-galaxy/agentic-qa-boilerplatetheir own version, first seen Nov 7, 2026
- proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qetheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- fishzjp/qa-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 21, 2026
- mejbaurbahar/software-tester-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- nahid-sparktales/agent-dispatchertheir own version, first seen Sep 21, 2026
- IrMaho/TeleDOMtheir own version, first seen Sep 11, 2026
Other versions8 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 8
- proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe★ 524same name
- fishzjp/qa-skills★ 62same name
- nahid-sparktales/agent-dispatcher★ 59same name
- upex-galaxy/agentic-qa-boilerplate★ 26same name
- IrMaho/TeleDOM★ 10same name
- mejbaurbahar/fagun★ 1same name
- mejbaurbahar/software-tester-skills★ 1same name
- Victoriakaey/build-reliable-agents★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository4 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- bug-investigationSkill
- feature-planningSkill
- release-reviewSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 7 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 8
Read docs/testing.md and the domain document for the changed code.
- Distinctive: line 29
Do not weaken or delete tests, alter warning policy, or update baselines merely to make a run green.
- Very specific: line 34
Use --plugin-selftest --skip-invoke and safe sentinel inputs.
- Distinctive: line 35
Do not run GUI tests unless the user explicitly requests it.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 7 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
StarPie Regression Testing
Read docs/testing.md and the domain document for the changed code.
Build the matrix
Cover:
- the reported scenario or requested behavior;
- neighboring existing behavior likely to regress;
- empty, missing, invalid and legacy data;
- disabled/uninstalled plugin and failed dependency states where relevant;
- language/theme/DPI states for UI work;
- cancellation, timeout and release for asynchronous plugin work;
- scope and packaging boundaries.
Evidence rules
- Bind all results to a worktree plus commit/diff identity.
- Record exact commands, exit codes and important output.
- Re-run gates yourself; do not accept implementation summaries as proof.
- A source-text presence check is a structural smoke test, not behavior coverage.
- New assertions should demonstrate a red state through the base version, a safe mutation, or a concrete counterexample.
- Do not weaken or delete tests, alter warning policy, or update baselines merely to make a run green.
Safe execution
- Automated tests must not send real input, run user commands, alter windows/hardware, or invoke live plugin actions.
- Use
--plugin-selftest --skip-invokeand safe sentinel inputs. - Do not run GUI tests unless the user explicitly requests it; provide the command and manual acceptance checklist instead.
Report pass/fail/blocked separately for automated gates, independent review and human gates. Never call the task complete while a required gate is pending.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

