agentleFS
SoftBlack42SoftBlack42/StarPie/.agents/skills/regression-testing/SKILL.md

regression-testing

Skill1.3k starsChanged 12 days agoMITView on GitHub

Design and run StarPie regression verification tied to the exact candidate, including Release builds, plugin self-tests, static guards, UIA boundaries, mutation checks, and human acceptance. Use after implementation or when strengthening tests.

8 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 7 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 2

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Read docs/testing.md and the domain document for the changed code.

    line 8
  2. Distinctive:

    Do not weaken or delete tests, alter warning policy, or update baselines merely to make a run green.

    line 29
  3. Very specific:

    Use --plugin-selftest --skip-invoke and safe sentinel inputs.

    line 34
  4. Distinctive:

    Do not run GUI tests unless the user explicitly requests it.

    line 35

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 7 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

StarPie Regression Testing

Read docs/testing.md and the domain document for the changed code.

Build the matrix

Cover:

  • the reported scenario or requested behavior;
  • neighboring existing behavior likely to regress;
  • empty, missing, invalid and legacy data;
  • disabled/uninstalled plugin and failed dependency states where relevant;
  • language/theme/DPI states for UI work;
  • cancellation, timeout and release for asynchronous plugin work;
  • scope and packaging boundaries.

Evidence rules

  • Bind all results to a worktree plus commit/diff identity.
  • Record exact commands, exit codes and important output.
  • Re-run gates yourself; do not accept implementation summaries as proof.
  • A source-text presence check is a structural smoke test, not behavior coverage.
  • New assertions should demonstrate a red state through the base version, a safe mutation, or a concrete counterexample.
  • Do not weaken or delete tests, alter warning policy, or update baselines merely to make a run green.

Safe execution

  • Automated tests must not send real input, run user commands, alter windows/hardware, or invoke live plugin actions.
  • Use --plugin-selftest --skip-invoke and safe sentinel inputs.
  • Do not run GUI tests unless the user explicitly requests it; provide the command and manual acceptance checklist instead.

Report pass/fail/blocked separately for automated gates, independent review and human gates. Never call the task complete while a required gate is pending.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.