regression-testing
Skill524 starsChanged 33 days agoMITView on GitHub
Strategic regression testing with test selection, impact analysis, and continuous regression management. Use when verifying fixes don't break existing functionality, planning regression suites, or optimizing test execution for faster feedback.
8 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- upex-galaxy/agentic-qa-boilerplatetheir own version, first seen Nov 7, 2026
- fishzjp/qa-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 21, 2026
- mejbaurbahar/software-tester-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- SoftBlack42/StarPietheir own version, first seen Oct 9, 2026
- nahid-sparktales/agent-dispatchertheir own version, first seen Sep 21, 2026
- IrMaho/TeleDOMtheir own version, first seen Sep 11, 2026
Other versions8 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 8
- SoftBlack42/StarPie★ 1.3ksame name
- fishzjp/qa-skills★ 62same name
- nahid-sparktales/agent-dispatcher★ 59same name
- upex-galaxy/agentic-qa-boilerplate★ 26same name
- IrMaho/TeleDOM★ 10same name
- mejbaurbahar/fagun★ 1same name
- mejbaurbahar/software-tester-skills★ 1same name
- Victoriakaey/build-reliable-agents★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository129 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .claude/commands/monitoring/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- aqe-plan-qualitySkill
- aqe-plan-workSkill
- aqe-researchSkill
- aqe-review-qualitySkill
- aqe-rufloSkill
- aqe-test-changeSkill
- rufloSkill
- a11y-allySkill
- accessibility-testingSkill
- AgentDB Advanced FeaturesSkill
- AgentDB Learning PluginsSkill
- AgentDB Memory PatternsSkill
- AgentDB Performance OptimizationSkill
- AgentDB Vector SearchSkill
- agentic-quality-engineeringSkill
- api-testing-patternsSkill
- browserSkill
- brutal-honesty-reviewSkill
- bug-reporting-excellenceSkill
- chaos-engineering-resilienceSkill
- cicd-pipeline-qe-orchestratorSkill
- code-review-qualitySkill
- compatibility-testingSkill
- compliance-testingSkill
- consultancy-practicesSkill
- context-driven-testingSkill
- contract-testingSkill
- coverage-drop-investigatorSkill
- coverage-guardSkill
- database-testingSkill
- debug-loopSkill
- e2e-flow-verifierSkill
- enterprise-integration-testingSkill
- exploratory-testing-advancedSkill
- flow-nexus-neuralSkill
- flow-nexus-platformSkill
- flow-nexus-swarmSkill
- freeze-testsSkill
- github-code-reviewSkill
- github-multi-repoSkill
- github-project-managementSkill
- github-release-managementSkill
- github-workflow-automationSkill
- holistic-testing-pactSkill
- Hooks AutomationSkill
- iterative-loopSkill
- localization-testingSkill
- middleware-testing-patternsSkill
- mobile-testingSkill
- mutation-testingSkill
- n8n-expression-testingSkill
- n8n-integration-testing-patternsSkill
- n8n-security-testingSkill
- n8n-trigger-testing-strategiesSkill
- n8n-workflow-testing-fundamentalsSkill
- no-skipSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 7 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 24
When verifying changes don't break existing functionality:
- Distinctive: line 27
RUN in priority order (smoke → selective → full)
- Distinctive: line 39
Every production bug becomes a regression test </default_to_action>
- Distinctive: line 45
After any code change
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 7 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Regression Testing
<default_to_action> When verifying changes don't break existing functionality:
- ANALYZE what changed (git diff, impact analysis)
- SELECT tests based on change + risk (not everything)
- RUN in priority order (smoke → selective → full)
- OPTIMIZE execution (parallel, sharding)
- MONITOR suite health (flakiness, execution time)
Quick Regression Strategy:
- Per-commit: Smoke + changed code tests (5-10 min)
- Nightly: Extended regression (30-60 min)
- Pre-release: Full regression (2-4 hours)
Critical Success Factors:
- Smart selection catches 90% of regressions in 10% of time
- Flaky tests waste more time than they save
- Every production bug becomes a regression test </default_to_action>
Quick Reference Card
When to Use
- After any code change
- Before release
- After dependency updates
- After environment changes
Test Selection Strategies
| Strategy | How | Reduction |
| Change-based | Git diff analysis | 70-90% |
| Risk-based | Priority by impact | 50-70% |
| Historical | Frequently failing | 40-60% |
| Time-budget | Fixed time window | Variable |
Change-Based Test Selection
// Analyze changed files and select impacted tests
function selectTests(changedFiles: string[]): string[] {
const testsToRun = new Set<string>();
for (const file of changedFiles) {
// Direct tests
testsToRun.add(`${file.replace('.ts', '.test.ts')}`);
// Dependent tests (via coverage mapping)
const dependentTests = testCoverage[file] || [];
dependentTests.forEach(t => testsToRun.add(t));
}
return Array.from(testsToRun);
}
// Example: payment.ts changed
// Runs: payment.test.ts, checkout.integration.test.ts, e2e/purchase.test.tsCI/CD Integration
# .github/workflows/regression.yml
jobs:
quick-regression:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
timeout-minutes: 15
steps:
- name: Analyze changes
id: changes
uses: dorny/paths-filter@v2
with:
filters: |
payment:
- 'src/payment/**'
auth:
- 'src/auth/**'
- name: Run affected tests
run: npm run test:affected
- name: Smoke tests (always)
run: npm run test:smoke
nightly-regression:
if: github.event_name == 'schedule'
timeout-minutes: 120
steps:
- run: npm test -- --coverageAgent-Driven Regression
// Smart test selection
await Task("Regression Analysis", {
pr: 1234,
strategy: 'change-based-with-risk',
timeBudget: '15min'
}, "qe-regression-risk-analyzer");
// Returns:
// {
// mustRun: ['payment.test.ts', 'checkout.integration.test.ts'],
// shouldRun: ['order.test.ts'],
// canSkip: ['profile.test.ts', 'search.test.ts'],
// estimatedTime: '12 min',
// riskCoverage: 0.94
// }
// Generate regression test from production bug
await Task("Bug Regression Test", {
bug: { id: 'BUG-567', description: 'Checkout fails > 100 items' },
preventRecurrence: true
}, "qe-test-generator");Agent Coordination Hints
Memory Namespace
aqe/regression-testing/
├── test-selection/* - Impact analysis results
├── suite-health/* - Flakiness, timing trends
├── coverage-maps/* - Test-to-code mapping
└── bug-regressions/* - Tests from production bugsFleet Coordination
const regressionFleet = await FleetManager.coordinate({
strategy: 'comprehensive-regression',
agents: [
'qe-regression-risk-analyzer', // Analyze changes, select tests
'qe-test-executor', // Execute selected tests
'qe-coverage-analyzer', // Analyze coverage gaps
'qe-quality-gate' // Go/no-go decision
],
topology: 'sequential'
});Related Skills
- risk-based-testing - Risk-based prioritization
- test-automation-strategy - Automation pyramid
- continuous-testing-shift-left - CI/CD integration
Remember
With Agents: qe-regression-risk-analyzer provides intelligent test selection achieving 90% defect detection in 10% of execution time. Agents generate regression tests from production bugs automatically.
Skill Composition
- Test failing? → Use
/test-failure-investigatorto diagnose root cause - File a bug → Use
/bug-reporting-excellencefor proper bug reporting - Test selection → Use
/risk-based-testingfor risk-based prioritization
Gotchas
- Agent defaults to "run everything" despite being told to select — explicitly constrain with
--affectedor file list - Change-based selection misses transitive dependencies — a model change can break a controller test 3 hops away
- Flaky tests in regression suites erode trust faster than missing tests — quarantine immediately, don't skip
- Agent may report "0 regressions" when tests simply weren't run — verify test count in output, not just pass/fail
- Running full regression in containers often OOMs — use
--workers=2and--shardfor CI environments
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

