chaos-engineering-resilience
Skill515 starsChanged 22 days agoMITView on GitHub
Chaos engineering principles, controlled failure injection, resilience testing, and system recovery validation. Use when testing distributed systems, building confidence in fault tolerance, or validating disaster recovery.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 24
When testing system resilience or injecting failures:
- Distinctive: line 32
Start small: Dev → Staging → 1% prod → gradual rollout
- Distinctive: line 35
Document findings → runbooks → improved resilience
- Distinctive: line 40
Start in non-production, graduate to production </default_to_action>
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Chaos Engineering & Resilience Testing
<default_to_action> When testing system resilience or injecting failures:
- DEFINE steady state (normal metrics: error rate, latency, throughput)
- HYPOTHESIZE system continues in steady state during failure
- INJECT real-world failures (network, instance, disk, CPU)
- OBSERVE and measure deviation from steady state
- FIX weaknesses discovered, document runbooks, repeat
Quick Chaos Steps:
- Start small: Dev → Staging → 1% prod → gradual rollout
- Define clear rollback triggers (error_rate > 5%)
- Measure blast radius, never exceed planned scope
- Document findings → runbooks → improved resilience
Critical Success Factors:
- Controlled experiments with automatic rollback
- Steady state must be measurable
- Start in non-production, graduate to production </default_to_action>
Quick Reference Card
When to Use
- Distributed systems validation
- Disaster recovery testing
- Building confidence in fault tolerance
- Pre-production resilience verification
Failure Types to Inject
| Category | Failures | Tools |
| Network | Latency, packet loss, partition | tc, toxiproxy |
| Infrastructure | Instance kill, disk failure, CPU | Chaos Monkey |
| Application | Exceptions, slow responses, leaks | Gremlin, LitmusChaos |
| Dependencies | Service outage, timeout | WireMock |
Blast Radius Progression
Dev (safe) → Staging → 1% prod → 10% → 50% → 100%
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
Learn Validate Careful Full confidenceSteady State Metrics
| Metric | Normal | Alert Threshold |
| Error rate | < 0.1% | > 1% |
| p99 latency | < 200ms | > 500ms |
| Throughput | baseline | -20% |
Chaos Experiment Structure
// Chaos experiment definition
const experiment = {
name: 'Database latency injection',
hypothesis: 'System handles 500ms DB latency gracefully',
steadyState: {
errorRate: '< 0.1%',
p99Latency: '< 300ms'
},
method: {
type: 'network-latency',
target: 'database',
delay: '500ms',
duration: '5m'
},
rollback: {
automatic: true,
trigger: 'errorRate > 5%'
}
};Agent-Driven Chaos
// qe-chaos-engineer runs controlled experiments
await Task("Chaos Experiment", {
target: 'payment-service',
failure: 'terminate-random-instance',
blastRadius: '10%',
duration: '5m',
steadyStateHypothesis: {
metric: 'success-rate',
threshold: 0.99
},
autoRollback: true
}, "qe-chaos-engineer");
// Validates:
// - System recovers automatically
// - Error rate stays within threshold
// - No data loss
// - Alerts triggered appropriatelyAgent Coordination Hints
Memory Namespace
aqe/chaos-engineering/
├── experiments/* - Experiment definitions & results
├── steady-states/* - Baseline measurements
├── runbooks/* - Generated recovery procedures
└── blast-radius/* - Impact analysisFleet Coordination
const chaosFleet = await FleetManager.coordinate({
strategy: 'chaos-engineering',
agents: [
'qe-chaos-engineer', // Experiment execution
'qe-performance-tester', // Baseline metrics
'qe-production-intelligence' // Production monitoring
],
topology: 'sequential'
});Related Skills
- shift-right-testing - Production testing
- performance-testing - Load testing
- test-environment-management - Environment stability
Remember
Break things on purpose to prevent unplanned outages. Find weaknesses before users do. Define steady state, inject failures, measure impact, fix weaknesses, create runbooks. Start small, increase blast radius gradually.
With Agents: qe-chaos-engineer automates chaos experiments with blast radius control, automatic rollback, and comprehensive resilience validation. Generates runbooks from experiment results.
In this repository129 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .claude/commands/monitoring/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- aqe-plan-qualitySkill
- aqe-plan-workSkill
- aqe-researchSkill
- aqe-review-qualitySkill
- aqe-rufloSkill
- aqe-test-changeSkill
- rufloSkill
- a11y-allySkill
- accessibility-testingSkill
- AgentDB Advanced FeaturesSkill
- AgentDB Learning PluginsSkill
- AgentDB Memory PatternsSkill
- AgentDB Performance OptimizationSkill
- AgentDB Vector SearchSkill
- agentic-quality-engineeringSkill
- api-testing-patternsSkill
- browserSkill
- brutal-honesty-reviewSkill
- bug-reporting-excellenceSkill
- cicd-pipeline-qe-orchestratorSkill
- code-review-qualitySkill
- compatibility-testingSkill
- compliance-testingSkill
- consultancy-practicesSkill
- context-driven-testingSkill
- contract-testingSkill
- coverage-drop-investigatorSkill
- coverage-guardSkill
- database-testingSkill
- debug-loopSkill
- e2e-flow-verifierSkill
- enterprise-integration-testingSkill
- exploratory-testing-advancedSkill
- flow-nexus-neuralSkill
- flow-nexus-platformSkill
- flow-nexus-swarmSkill
- freeze-testsSkill
- github-code-reviewSkill
- github-multi-repoSkill
- github-project-managementSkill
- github-release-managementSkill
- github-workflow-automationSkill
- holistic-testing-pactSkill
- Hooks AutomationSkill
- iterative-loopSkill
- localization-testingSkill
- middleware-testing-patternsSkill
- mobile-testingSkill
- mutation-testingSkill
- n8n-expression-testingSkill
- n8n-integration-testing-patternsSkill
- n8n-security-testingSkill
- n8n-trigger-testing-strategiesSkill
- n8n-workflow-testing-fundamentalsSkill
- no-skipSkill
- observability-testing-patternsSkill
- The first 60 shown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

