api-testing-patterns
Skill515 starsChanged 22 days agoMITView on GitHub
Comprehensive API testing patterns including contract testing, REST/GraphQL testing, and integration testing. Use when testing APIs or designing API test strategies.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈6
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 24
When testing APIs or designing API test strategy:
- Distinctive: line 26
TEST the contract, not implementation (consumer perspective)
- Distinctive: line 40
Always test error scenarios, not just happy paths
- Distinctive: line 209
Test from consumer perspective
- Distinctive: line 210
Use schema validation (not exact values)
- Distinctive: line 211
Test error scenarios extensively
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
API Testing Patterns
<default_to_action> When testing APIs or designing API test strategy:
- IDENTIFY testing level: contract, integration, or component
- TEST the contract, not implementation (consumer perspective)
- VALIDATE auth, input, errors, idempotency, concurrency
- AUTOMATE in CI/CD with schema validation
- MONITOR production APIs for contract drift
Quick Pattern Selection:
- Microservices → Consumer-driven contracts (Pact)
- REST APIs → CRUD + pagination + filtering tests
- GraphQL → Query validation + complexity limits
- External deps → Mock with component testing
- Performance → Load test critical endpoints
Critical Success Factors:
- APIs are contracts - test from consumer perspective
- Always test error scenarios, not just happy paths
- Version your API tests to prevent breaking changes </default_to_action>
Quick Reference Card
When to Use
- Testing REST or GraphQL APIs
- Validating microservice contracts
- Designing API test strategies
- Preventing breaking API changes
Testing Levels
| Level | Purpose | Dependencies | Speed |
| Contract | Provider-consumer agreement | None | Fast |
| Component | API in isolation | Mocked | Fast |
| Integration | Real dependencies | Database, services | Slower |
Critical Test Scenarios
| Scenario | Must Test | Example |
| Auth | 401/403 handling | Expired token, wrong user |
| Input | 400 validation | Missing fields, wrong types |
| Errors | 500 graceful handling | DB down, timeout |
| Idempotency | Duplicate prevention | Same idempotency key |
| Concurrency | Race conditions | Parallel checkout |
Tools
- Contract: Pact, Spring Cloud Contract
- REST: Supertest, REST-assured, Playwright
- Load: k6, Artillery, JMeter
Agent Coordination
qe-api-contract-validator: Validate contracts, detect breaking changesqe-test-generator: Generate tests from OpenAPI specqe-performance-tester: Load test endpointsqe-security-scanner: API security testing
Contract Testing
Pattern: Consumer-Driven Contracts
// Consumer defines expectations
const contract = {
request: { method: 'POST', path: '/orders', body: { productId: 'abc', quantity: 2 } },
response: { status: 201, body: { orderId: 'string', total: 'number' } }
};
// Provider must fulfill
test('order API meets contract', async () => {
const response = await api.post('/orders', { productId: 'abc', quantity: 2 });
expect(response.status).toBe(201);
expect(response.body).toMatchSchema({
orderId: expect.any(String),
total: expect.any(Number)
});
});When: Microservices, distributed systems, third-party integrations
Critical Test Patterns
Authentication & Authorization
describe('Auth', () => {
it('rejects without token', async () => {
expect((await api.get('/orders')).status).toBe(401);
});
it('rejects expired token', async () => {
const expired = generateExpiredToken();
expect((await api.get('/orders', { headers: { Authorization: `Bearer ${expired}` } })).status).toBe(401);
});
it('blocks cross-user access', async () => {
const userAToken = generateToken({ userId: 'A' });
expect((await api.get('/orders/user-B-order', { headers: { Authorization: `Bearer ${userAToken}` } })).status).toBe(403);
});
});Input Validation
describe('Validation', () => {
it('validates required fields', async () => {
const response = await api.post('/orders', { quantity: 2 }); // Missing productId
expect(response.status).toBe(400);
expect(response.body.errors).toContain('productId is required');
});
it('validates types', async () => {
expect((await api.post('/orders', { productId: 'abc', quantity: 'two' })).status).toBe(400);
});
it('validates ranges', async () => {
expect((await api.post('/orders', { productId: 'abc', quantity: -5 })).status).toBe(400);
});
});Idempotency
it('prevents duplicates with idempotency key', async () => {
const key = 'unique-123';
const data = { productId: 'abc', quantity: 2 };
const r1 = await api.post('/orders', data, { headers: { 'Idempotency-Key': key } });
const r2 = await api.post('/orders', data, { headers: { 'Idempotency-Key': key } });
expect(r1.body.orderId).toBe(r2.body.orderId); // Same order
});Concurrency
it('handles race condition on inventory', async () => {
const promises = Array(10).fill().map(() =>
api.post('/orders', { productId: 'abc', quantity: 1 })
);
const responses = await Promise.all(promises);
const successful = responses.filter(r => r.status === 201);
const inventory = await db.inventory.findById('abc');
expect(inventory.quantity).toBe(initialQuantity - successful.length);
});REST CRUD Pattern
describe('Product CRUD', () => {
let productId;
it('CREATE', async () => {
const r = await api.post('/products', { name: 'Widget', price: 10 });
expect(r.status).toBe(201);
productId = r.body.id;
});
it('READ', async () => {
const r = await api.get(`/products/${productId}`);
expect(r.body.name).toBe('Widget');
});
it('UPDATE', async () => {
const r = await api.put(`/products/${productId}`, { price: 12 });
expect(r.body.price).toBe(12);
});
it('DELETE', async () => {
expect((await api.delete(`/products/${productId}`)).status).toBe(204);
expect((await api.get(`/products/${productId}`)).status).toBe(404);
});
});Best Practices
✅ Do This
- Test from consumer perspective
- Use schema validation (not exact values)
- Test error scenarios extensively
- Version API tests
- Automate in CI/CD
❌ Avoid This
- Testing implementation, not contract
- Ignoring HTTP semantics (status codes)
- No negative testing
- Asserting on field order or extra fields
- Slow tests (mock external services)
Agent-Assisted API Testing
// Validate contracts
await Task("Contract Validation", {
spec: 'openapi.yaml',
endpoint: '/orders',
checkBreakingChanges: true
}, "qe-api-contract-validator");
// Generate tests from spec
await Task("Generate API Tests", {
spec: 'openapi.yaml',
coverage: 'comprehensive',
include: ['happy-paths', 'input-validation', 'auth-scenarios', 'error-handling']
}, "qe-test-generator");
// Load test
await Task("API Load Test", {
endpoint: '/orders',
rps: 1000,
duration: '5min'
}, "qe-performance-tester");
// Security scan
await Task("API Security Scan", {
spec: 'openapi.yaml',
checks: ['sql-injection', 'xss', 'broken-auth', 'rate-limiting']
}, "qe-security-scanner");Agent Coordination Hints
Memory Namespace
aqe/api-testing/
├── contracts/* - API contract definitions
├── generated-tests/* - Generated test suites
├── validation/* - Contract validation results
└── performance/* - Load test resultsFleet Coordination
const apiFleet = await FleetManager.coordinate({
strategy: 'contract-testing',
agents: ['qe-api-contract-validator', 'qe-test-generator', 'qe-test-executor'],
topology: 'mesh'
});
await apiFleet.execute({
services: [
{ name: 'orders-api', consumers: ['checkout-ui', 'admin-api'] },
{ name: 'payment-api', consumers: ['orders-api'] }
]
});Related Skills
- agentic-quality-engineering - API testing with agents
- tdd-london-chicago - London school for API testing
- performance-testing - API load testing
- security-testing - API security validation
- contract-testing - Consumer-driven contracts deep dive
Remember
API testing = verifying contracts and behavior, not implementation. Focus on what matters to consumers: correct responses, proper error handling, acceptable performance.
With Agents: Agents automate contract validation, generate comprehensive test suites from specs, and monitor production APIs for drift. Use agents to maintain API quality at scale.
Gotchas
- Agent generates tests against documented API, not actual API — always validate against running service first
- Auth tokens expire between test runs — use fixtures with long-lived tokens or refresh before each suite
- Rate limiting in CI causes intermittent failures — add retry with exponential backoff for 429 responses
- GraphQL introspection may be disabled in production — test against staging schema, not production endpoint
- Idempotency tests need unique request IDs per run — hardcoded IDs cause false passes on retry
In this repository129 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .claude/commands/monitoring/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- aqe-plan-qualitySkill
- aqe-plan-workSkill
- aqe-researchSkill
- aqe-review-qualitySkill
- aqe-rufloSkill
- aqe-test-changeSkill
- rufloSkill
- a11y-allySkill
- accessibility-testingSkill
- AgentDB Advanced FeaturesSkill
- AgentDB Learning PluginsSkill
- AgentDB Memory PatternsSkill
- AgentDB Performance OptimizationSkill
- AgentDB Vector SearchSkill
- agentic-quality-engineeringSkill
- browserSkill
- brutal-honesty-reviewSkill
- bug-reporting-excellenceSkill
- chaos-engineering-resilienceSkill
- cicd-pipeline-qe-orchestratorSkill
- code-review-qualitySkill
- compatibility-testingSkill
- compliance-testingSkill
- consultancy-practicesSkill
- context-driven-testingSkill
- contract-testingSkill
- coverage-drop-investigatorSkill
- coverage-guardSkill
- database-testingSkill
- debug-loopSkill
- e2e-flow-verifierSkill
- enterprise-integration-testingSkill
- exploratory-testing-advancedSkill
- flow-nexus-neuralSkill
- flow-nexus-platformSkill
- flow-nexus-swarmSkill
- freeze-testsSkill
- github-code-reviewSkill
- github-multi-repoSkill
- github-project-managementSkill
- github-release-managementSkill
- github-workflow-automationSkill
- holistic-testing-pactSkill
- Hooks AutomationSkill
- iterative-loopSkill
- localization-testingSkill
- middleware-testing-patternsSkill
- mobile-testingSkill
- mutation-testingSkill
- n8n-expression-testingSkill
- n8n-integration-testing-patternsSkill
- n8n-security-testingSkill
- n8n-trigger-testing-strategiesSkill
- n8n-workflow-testing-fundamentalsSkill
- no-skipSkill
- observability-testing-patternsSkill
- The first 60 shown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

