verify
Skill4 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Self-test the Citadel hook pipeline from within a live session. Exercises real tool calls (Write, Edit, Bash, Read) and checks that hooks fired, telemetry accumulated, and no errors occurred. Reports HOOK HEALTH: PASS or HOOK HEALTH: FAIL with a per-hook breakdown.
- Reads credentials
188 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Doist/todoist-aitheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- udecode/better-convextheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- pytorch/heliontheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- amir20/dozzletheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Doist/todoist-clitheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kittheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use instinct-export, instinct-import and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
TheKREATORSSkillinstinct-export
Export instincts from project/global scope to a file
Also in 3 projects that use this
TheKREATORSSkillinstinct-import
Import instincts from file or URL into project/global scope
Also in 3 projects that use this
AviadPSkillrisk-assess
Assess the risk and blast radius of a proposed code change before implementing it. Evaluates CI impact, framework-wide vs localized scope, rollback path, and identifies blindspots. Use when user says "what's the risk", "is this safe", "assess the impact", "risk assess", "blast radius", or before applying framework-wide or CI-affecting changes. Do NOT use for code quality review (use code-quality) or plan validation (use design-validator).
Also in 3 projects that use this
diego-tobalinaSkillbuild-fix
Fix build and compilation errors systematically. Run when build fails.
Also in 6 projects that use this
AaravChadhaSkillsecure
Security review with a confidence gate - a finding exists only with a concrete exploit scenario and a high/medium/low confidence rating; everything else goes to a worth-hardening list, never inflated. Sweeps five surfaces: auth gates, secrets hygiene, injection and unsafe sinks, unsafe deserialization/crypto/transport, and LLM tool-use trust boundaries. Reports only, never fixes. Use when the user asks for a security review or to check vulnerabilities, secrets, or auth.
Also in 3 projects that use this
ArvorCoSkillspecify
Create feature specification from natural language description. Use when starting a new feature or creating a spec. Triggers on: create spec, specify feature, new feature spec.
Also in 10 projects that use this
- +1 more from TheKREATORS
Other versions188 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- SethGammon/Citadel★ 92798% same
Wrote their own version · 187
- react/react★ 252ksame name
- facebook/react★ 252ksame name
- garrytan/gstack★ 141ksame name
- oven-sh/bun★ 97ksame name
- anthropics/financial-services★ 41ksame name
- anthropics/financial-services-plugins★ 41ksame name
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claude-sisyphus★ 41ksame name
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode★ 41ksame name
- anthropics/claude-quickstarts★ 19ksame name
- NVIDIA-NeMo/Speech★ 19ksame name
177 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository50 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- architectSkill
- archonSkill
- ascii-diagramSkill
- autopilotSkill
- costSkill
- create-appSkill
- create-skillSkill
- daemonSkill
- dashboardSkill
- decision-mapSkill
- deploy-stewardSkill
- designSkill
- doc-genSkill
- doSkill
- evolveSkill
- experimentSkill
- fleetSkill
- grillSkill
- housecleanSkill
- improveSkill
- infra-auditSkill
- learnSkill
- live-previewSkill
- loopSkill
- mapSkill
- marshalSkill
- merge-reviewSkill
- organizeSkill
- postmortemSkill
- prdSkill
- pr-watchSkill
- qaSkill
- refactorSkill
- research-fleetSkill
- researchSkill
- reviewSkill
- scaffoldSkill
- scheduleSkill
- session-handoffSkill
- setupSkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
- telemetrySkill
- test-genSkill
- triageSkill
- unharnessSkill
- watchSkill
- wikiSkill
- workspaceSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 167 edited versions we read keep these.
6
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 26
After installing Citadel in a new project
- Distinctive: line 32
Read the current telemetry state:
- Distinctive: line 39
If telemetry directory doesn't exist, note it (init-project may not have run).
- Distinctive: line 43
Run these tool calls in sequence.
- Distinctive: line 66
After all tool calls complete, read telemetry again:
- Distinctive: line 110
First-time run (no baseline): If the files don't exist before the test, they should be created during the test.
- Distinctive: line 121
All 3 telemetry checks must pass: timing grew, audit grew, no new errors
- Very specific: line 124
If .planning/telemetry/ does not exist, FAIL immediately — do not fabricate counts
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 167 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
/verify — Hook Pipeline Self-Test
Use this when:
- Hooks were recently updated and you want a live sanity check
- Something feels wrong (tools seem too slow, quality-gate not firing)
- After installing Citadel in a new project
Protocol
Step 1: Baseline
Read the current telemetry state:
.planning/telemetry/hook-timing.jsonl → count lines (baseline_timing)
.planning/telemetry/audit.jsonl → count lines (baseline_audit)
.planning/telemetry/hook-errors.log → size in bytes (baseline_errors)If telemetry directory doesn't exist, note it (init-project may not have run).
Step 2: Exercise hooks
Run these tool calls in sequence. Each exercises a different hook:
- Write a temp file at
.planning/verify-temp.ts:
→ Exercises: PreToolUse (protect-files, governance), PostToolUse (post-edit)// citadel verify probe export const verifyProbe = true; - Edit the same file — change
truetofalse: → Exercises: PreToolUse (protect-files, governance), PostToolUse (post-edit) - Bash a harmless read command:
echo "verify-probe"→ Exercises: PreToolUse (governance) - Read the temp file back → Exercises: PreToolUse (protect-files — should allow, it's not .env)
- Delete the temp file:
rm .planning/verify-temp.tsor equivalent → Cleanup
Step 3: Check side effects
After all tool calls complete, read telemetry again:
| Check | Expected | Result |
| hook-timing.jsonl grew | +2 or more lines (Write + Edit post-hooks) | PASS/FAIL |
| audit.jsonl grew | +3 or more lines (Write + Edit + Bash pre-hooks) | PASS/FAIL |
| hook-errors.log unchanged | same size as baseline | PASS/FAIL |
Step 4: Report
Output a results block:
=== HOOK HEALTH CHECK ===
hook-timing.jsonl: +N lines [PASS / FAIL]
audit.jsonl: +N lines [PASS / FAIL]
hook-errors.log: no errors [PASS / FAIL — N new errors]
HOOK HEALTH: PASSOr if any check fails:
HOOK HEALTH: FAIL
Failing checks:
- hook-timing.jsonl did not grow: PostToolUse hooks may not be firing
→ Verify hooks are installed: node scripts/verify-hooks.js
→ Check settings.json: cat .claude/settings.json | grep PostToolUse
- audit.jsonl did not grow: governance hook may not be firing
→ Check: node hooks_src/governance.js <<< '{}'Edge Cases
No .planning/telemetry/ directory: Init-project may not have run. Output: "HOOK HEALTH: FAIL — .planning/telemetry/ not found. Run: node hooks_src/init-project.js"
Hooks installed but telemetry still zero: The project may have a harness.json
that disables telemetry. Check features.telemetry in .claude/harness.json.
First-time run (no baseline): If the files don't exist before the test, they should be created during the test. Treat "file created" as equivalent to "grew".
What This Does NOT Test
- Hook correctness on edge cases (use verify-hooks.js for that)
- Full PreToolUse → tool → PostToolUse sequence isolation (use integration-test.js)
- Skill output quality (use skill-bench.js --execute)
Quality Gates
- All 3 telemetry checks must pass: timing grew, audit grew, no new errors
- Temp file must be cleaned up regardless of pass/fail outcome
- Report must include exact counts (+N lines), not just PASS/FAIL
- If .planning/telemetry/ does not exist, FAIL immediately — do not fabricate counts
Contextual Gates
Disclosure: Creates and deletes .planning/verify-temp.ts during the test. No other files modified.
Reversibility: green — temp file deleted on completion; no persistent changes.
Trust gates: Any — no restrictions.
Exit Protocol
---HANDOFF---
- Hook pipeline: PASS / FAIL
- hook-timing.jsonl: +N lines
- audit.jsonl: +N lines
- hook-errors.log: N new errors (0 expected)
- Reversibility: green — no persistent changes; verify-temp.ts cleaned up
- Next: if FAIL, run node scripts/verify-hooks.js for deeper diagnostics
---Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

