agentleFS
mayankjain1815-commitsmayankjain1815-commits/CITADEL/skills/doc-gen/SKILL.md

doc-gen

Skill4 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Documentation generator with three modes: function-level (JSDoc/docstrings), module-level (directory READMEs), and API reference (endpoints/exports). Reads existing project doc style and matches it. Never generates docs that just restate what the signature already says.

9 other projects use a version of this, 3 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

14 rules. 5 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 5

    Common

    Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 7

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Common:

    Add JSDoc/docstrings to functions in a file or set of files

    line 25
  2. Common:

    Write a README for a module or directory

    line 26
  3. Common:

    Document an HTTP API or exported library surface

    line 27
  4. Distinctive:

    Read CLAUDE.md for doc conventions

    line 49
  5. Distinctive:

    Search for existing doc comments in the target area — note density, tone, tags used, and line length

    line 50
  6. Very specific:

    Default when no existing docs: JSDoc (@param, @returns, @throws, @example) for TS/JS.

    line 51
  7. Common:

    Read the full body, not just the signature

    line 61
  8. Very specific:

    Non-trivial: document purpose, parameter semantics (not types — TS has those), return guarantees, throws/errors, side effects, non-obvious …

    line 64
  9. Distinctive:

    Write using detected style

    line 65
  10. Distinctive:

    Core rule: every doc must add information beyond what the signature already says.

    line 67
  11. Common:

    Read all files in the directory (one level deep)

    line 71
  12. Distinctive:

    If a README already exists, update rather than replace — preserve sections not covered by your analysis

    line 74
  13. Distinctive:

    Run typecheck after writing (malformed JSDoc can cause TS errors)

    line 90
  14. Distinctive:

    Every doc comment adds information beyond the signature.

    line 106

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

/doc-gen — Documentation Generator

When to Use

  • Add JSDoc/docstrings to functions in a file or set of files
  • Write a README for a module or directory
  • Document an HTTP API or exported library surface

Mode auto-detected from target:

  • File path → function-level mode
  • Directory path → module-level mode
  • Route file or API directory → API reference mode
  • Explicit override: /doc-gen --mode function|module|api [target]

Commands

CommandBehavior
/doc-gen [file]Function-level docs for a file
/doc-gen [directory]Module-level README for a directory
/doc-gen --api [target]API reference for endpoints or exports
/doc-gen --mode [mode] [target]Force a specific mode
/doc-gen --dry-run [target]Show what would be documented without writing

Protocol

Phase 1: DETECT STYLE

  1. Read CLAUDE.md for doc conventions
  2. Search for existing doc comments in the target area — note density, tone, tags used, and line length
  3. Default when no existing docs: JSDoc (@param, @returns, @throws, @example) for TS/JS; Google-style for Python; idiomatic format for others

Apply detected style consistently across all generated docs.

Phase 2: ANALYZE TARGET

Function-Level Mode

For each function:

  1. Read the full body, not just the signature
  2. Classify:
    • Trivial: simple getters/setters, one-line wrappers with obvious names — SKIP
    • Non-trivial: document purpose, parameter semantics (not types — TS has those), return guarantees, throws/errors, side effects, non-obvious edge cases, and @example when usage is non-obvious
  3. Write using detected style

Core rule: every doc must add information beyond what the signature already says. If you cannot, skip it.

Module-Level Mode

  1. Read all files in the directory (one level deep)
  2. Identify: problem space, key exports, internal files, external dependencies, and what imports this module
  3. README schema: # {Module Name} | one-paragraph description | ## Key Exports table (name, description) | ## Architecture (only if non-obvious internal structure) | ## Usage (real import paths) | ## Dependencies (non-obvious only)
  4. If a README already exists, update rather than replace — preserve sections not covered by your analysis

API Reference Mode

For HTTP endpoints: method + path, description, path/query/body params (with types), response shape and status codes, errors, auth level, and a curl/fetch example for non-trivial endpoints.

For exported libraries: name and kind (function/class/constant/type), description, parameters/properties with semantics, return type with guarantees, import and usage example.

Structure as a single reference document with a table of contents.

Phase 3: WRITE

  1. Apply detected style consistently
  2. Function-level: insert doc comments above each function
  3. Module-level: write or update README.md in the target directory
  4. API reference: write to docs/api/ or adjacent to route files
  5. Run typecheck after writing (malformed JSDoc can cause TS errors)

Phase 4: VERIFY

Re-read every doc comment. For each: "Does this add information beyond the signature?" If not, delete it. Check accuracy: parameter names, return types, side effects, and that examples would actually compile/run.

Contextual Gates

Disclosure: "Generating documentation for [target]. Source files will be modified." Reversibility: amber — adds JSDoc/docstrings to source files; undo with git checkout on modified files. Trust gates:

  • Any: additive doc generation on undocumented functions.
  • Familiar (5+ sessions): rewriting existing docstrings that may discard prior content.

Quality Gates

  • Every doc comment adds information beyond the signature; if not, delete it
  • Docs match actual code behavior — wrong docs are worse than no docs
  • Style matches the project's existing convention throughout
  • No @param name - The name filler; omit parameters when their name is self-explanatory
  • Typecheck passes after insertion
  • At least some functions skipped as trivial — if every function was documented, you over-documented

Exit Protocol

=== Doc-Gen Report ===
Mode: {function-level | module-level | api-reference}
Target: {path}
Style: {detected style}
Documented: {N functions ({M} skipped as trivial) | README.md ({N} exports) | {N} endpoints}
Skipped: {item}: {reason}
---HANDOFF---
- Generated {mode} docs for {target}
- Matched existing {style} convention
- {what was skipped and why}
- Reversibility: amber — undo with `git checkout` on modified source files
---

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.