agentleFS
mayankjain1815-commitsmayankjain1815-commits/CITADEL/skills/workspace/SKILL.md

workspace

Skill4 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Multi-repo campaign coordinator. Same lifecycle as fleet -- scope claims, discovery relay, wave-based execution -- but the unit of work is a repo, not a file. Coordinates campaigns across repositories with shared context.

19 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use audit and security-audit.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • OpenAISkill

    audit

    Audit or critique a product flow, journey, workflow, funnel, onboarding path, checkout path, settings path, screen, or multi-step product experience by capturing screenshots first, then reporting UX, design, and accessibility findings inline from that evidence. Use Figma only when the user explicitly asks for a board. Use when the user asks to audit, review, critique, inspect, assess, analyze, evaluate, or give feedback on a product experience.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • CloudflareSkill

    security-audit

    Security guidance and vulnerability review for codebases, APIs, services, CLI tools, libraries, and daemons. Use for security questions, focused reviews, vulnerability research, security audits, or pen tests. Run the complete workflow only for explicit codebase audit or pen-test requests, full/comprehensive/end-to-end reviews, or requested report artifacts.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

14 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 8 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 16 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 6

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 8

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    All work is in one repo (use /fleet or /archon)

    line 33
  2. Very specific:

    Check for existing workspace session: .planning/workspace/session-{slug}.md — resume if status: active or needs-continue

    line 40
  3. Very specific:

    If starting fresh: identify repos, verify each path is a git repo, read each repo's CLAUDE.md, check .planning/campaigns/ for active …

    line 41
  4. Very specific:

    Create .planning/workspace/session-{slug}.md with frontmatter: version, id, status: active, started, completed_at: null, direction, repos …

    line 59
  5. Distinctive:

    Verify all dependency campaigns from prior waves completed successfully

    line 68
  6. Distinctive:

    Check cross-repo contracts: did producer repos create the expected outputs?

    line 69
  7. Distinctive:

    If a dependency failed: park the dependent campaign, flag for user decision

    line 70
  8. Very specific:

    Write workspace/briefs/wave{N}-{repo-name}.md for each completed campaign.

    line 90
  9. Distinctive:

    Run typecheck/build for each repo in isolation (build shared types package first if present)

    line 104
  10. Distinctive:

    Active campaign in target repo: Do not start a second campaign.

    line 115
  11. Very specific:

    .planning/workspace/ does not exist: Create it (and workspace/briefs/).

    line 117
  12. Distinctive:

    Repos on different machines or remotes: Not supported. All repos must be locally accessible.

    line 123
  13. Very specific:

    Monorepo with multiple packages: Treat each package as a "repo" for scoping purposes.

    line 125
  14. Very specific:

    Use {monorepo}:{package-path} as the scope identifier.

    line 126

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 16 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

/workspace -- Multi-Repo Campaign Coordinator

When to Use

  • Adding infrastructure that spans repos (new database, shared service, API contract)
  • Coordinating changes across a frontend repo, backend repo, and infra repo
  • Breaking a monolith into services (each service becomes a repo-scoped campaign)
  • Any task where changes in repo A depend on or inform changes in repo B

Do not use when:

  • All work is in one repo (use /fleet or /archon)
  • The repos are truly independent with no shared contracts (just run separate campaigns)

Protocol

Step 1: ORIENT

  1. Check for existing workspace session: .planning/workspace/session-{slug}.md — resume if status: active or needs-continue
  2. If starting fresh: identify repos, verify each path is a git repo, read each repo's CLAUDE.md, check .planning/campaigns/ for active campaigns (avoid collisions)
  3. Load prior session context and start watcher:
    node .citadel/scripts/momentum-watch-start.cjs
    node .citadel/scripts/momentum-read.cjs
    Skip momentum injection if output is empty.

Step 2: DECOMPOSE

Break the direction into repo-scoped work items (one campaign per repo per wave). Table format: # | Repo | Campaign Direction | Scope | Deps | Wave.

Rules: items with no deps → Wave 1; dependents → Wave 2+. Max 3 repo-campaigns per wave. Scope format: {repo}:{path}.

For each inter-wave dependency, specify the cross-repo contract: what the producer will produce, what the consumer expects, and where the contract lives (shared types package, OpenAPI spec, env var).

Step 3: WORKSPACE SESSION FILE

Create .planning/workspace/session-{slug}.md with frontmatter: version, id, status: active, started, completed_at: null, direction, repos (path + name + branch per repo), wave_count, current_wave: 1, campaigns_total, campaigns_complete: 0.

Body sections: Direction, Repos table (name/path/branch/status), Work Queue (table from Step 2), Cross-Repo Contracts (producer/consumer/contract/location), Wave Execution Log (per wave: status, campaigns, started, completed), Shared Context (discovery relay accumulation).

Step 4: WAVE EXECUTION

For each wave:

4a. Pre-flight

  • Verify all dependency campaigns from prior waves completed successfully
  • Check cross-repo contracts: did producer repos create the expected outputs?
  • If a dependency failed: park the dependent campaign, flag for user decision

4b. Spawn campaigns

For each repo-campaign in this wave:

  1. Create branch: git checkout -b workspace/{slug}/{repo-name}
  2. Spawn agent with direction: /archon for complex (3+ phases), /fleet if parallelizable, /marshal or direct skill for simple (1-2 steps)
  3. Inject context: discovery briefs from prior waves, prior session context (re-read momentum.json via node .citadel/scripts/momentum-read.cjs, inject as === PRIOR SESSION CONTEXT ===, skip if empty), cross-repo contracts, relevant CLAUDE.md sections from other repos

4c. Collect results

Extract HANDOFF blocks, compress into cross-repo discovery brief, write persistent discovery records:

node .citadel/scripts/discovery-write.cjs \
  --session {session-slug} --agent {repo-name}-{campaign-type} \
  --wave {wave-number} --status {success|partial|failed} \
  --scope "{repo-name}:{scope-path}" --handoff "{json-array}" \
  --decisions "{json-array}" --files "{json-array}" --failures "{json-array}"

4d. Discovery relay

Write workspace/briefs/wave{N}-{repo-name}.md for each completed campaign. Also write workspace/briefs/wave{N}-cross-repo.md summarizing:

  • New API endpoints or types created
  • Config changes that affect other repos
  • Contract fulfillment status (did the producer deliver what was promised?)

4e. Contract verification

For each cross-repo contract: verify the producer created the expected output (file + export for types, route existence for endpoints). If verification fails, flag and do not proceed with consumers.

4f. Update session

Mark completed campaigns, update wave status, write discovery relay, advance current_wave.

Step 5: COMPLETION

  1. Run typecheck/build for each repo in isolation (build shared types package first if present)
  2. Set session status: completed, completed_at: {ISO timestamp}
  3. Run node .citadel/scripts/momentum-synthesize.cjs
  4. List all branches created across repos with suggested merge order based on dependency graph
  5. Output HANDOFF

Fringe Cases

  • Repo not a git repo: Skip it. Report which repos were skipped and why.
  • Repo has uncommitted changes: Stash before branching. Record stash ref in session file. Pop on completion or failure.
  • Active campaign in target repo: Do not start a second campaign. Report the conflict and ask the user whether to wait, park the existing campaign, or merge scopes.
  • .planning/workspace/ does not exist: Create it (and workspace/briefs/).
  • Cross-repo contract broken: Park all downstream campaigns. Report which contract failed, which producer was responsible, and what the consumer expected. Do not attempt to fix the producer -- surface the issue for the user or re-run the producer campaign.
  • One repo fails, others succeed: Mark the failed repo-campaign. Do not roll back successful repos. The user decides whether to fix-and-continue or abandon.
  • Repos on different machines or remotes: Not supported. All repos must be locally accessible. If a repo is remote-only, the user must clone it first.
  • Monorepo with multiple packages: Treat each package as a "repo" for scoping purposes. Use {monorepo}:{package-path} as the scope identifier.

Contextual Gates

Disclosure: "Running multi-repo campaign across [repos]. Changes committed to each repo independently." Reversibility: red — coordinates changes across multiple repositories; cross-repo commits are hard to revert in bulk. Trust gates:

  • Familiar (5+ sessions): coordinates multi-repo campaigns autonomously; novices should use /marshal per repo.

Quality Gates

  • All repos verified as accessible git repositories before starting
  • Work queue has no scope overlaps within the same repo
  • Cross-repo contracts specified for every inter-wave dependency
  • Discovery relay written after each wave
  • Contract verification run before spawning consumer campaigns
  • Each repo's typecheck/build passes independently after completion
  • Session file updated after every wave (not just at the end)
  • No campaigns left in active state on completion

Exit Protocol

---HANDOFF---
- Workspace: {slug} -- {direction summary}
- Repos: {N} repos, {M} campaigns across {W} waves
- Results: {completed}/{total} campaigns succeeded
- Branches: {list branches ready for review}
- Merge order: {suggested order based on dependency graph}
- Unresolved: {any failed campaigns or broken contracts}
---

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.