agentleFS
mayankjain1815-commitsmayankjain1815-commits/CITADEL/skills/triage/SKILL.md

triage

Skill4 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

GitHub issue and PR investigator. Pulls open issues/PRs, classifies them, searches the codebase for root cause or reviews contributed code, proposes fixes with file:line references, and optionally implements fixes. Use for investigating GitHub issues and reviewing PRs; do NOT use for general code review unrelated to GitHub issues.

189 other projects use a version of this, 2 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use writing-beats, setup-matt-pocock-skills and 9 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • LesaniSkill

    writing-beats

    Shape an article as a journey of beats, choose-your-own-adventure style. The user picks a starting beat from the raw material, you write only that beat, then offer options for where to pivot next, beat by beat, until the article reaches a natural end. Use when the user has raw material and wants to assemble it as a narrative rather than an argument.

    Also in 66 projects that use this

  • GoogleSkill

    setup-matt-pocock-skills

    Configure this repo for the engineering skills — set up its issue tracker, triage label vocabulary, and domain doc layout. Run once before first use of the other engineering skills.

    Also in 167 projects that use this

  • liufeng1976Skill

    setup-ts-deep-modules

    Wire dependency-cruiser into a TypeScript repo so each package is a deep module — implementation hidden in subfolders, reachable only through its entry-point files. User-invoked.

    Also in 42 projects that use this

  • simo97Skill

    migrate-to-shoehorn

    Migrate test files from `as` type assertions to @total-typescript/shoehorn. Use when user mentions shoehorn, wants to replace `as` in tests, or needs partial test data.

    Also in 68 projects that use this

  • LesaniSkill

    writing-shape

    Take a markdown file of raw material and shape it into an article through a conversational session — drafting candidate openings, growing the piece paragraph by paragraph, arguing about format (lists, tables, callouts, quotes) at each step. Use when the user has a pile of notes, fragments, or a rough draft and wants help turning it into something publishable.

    Also in 63 projects that use this

  • RoentekSkill

    loop-me

    Grill me about specs for the workflows I want to build, within this workspace.

    Also in 54 projects that use this

  • +1 more from Lesani

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

22 rules. 0 are common, 15 are distinctive, and 7 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 176 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 15

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 7

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    After the issue-monitor SessionStart hook reports new issues

    line 34
  2. Very specific:

    Use native @codex review when the diff is GitHub-visible and the main need is a focused P0/P1 review.

    line 44
  3. Distinctive:

    After Codex posts a GitHub review, fetch and ingest the review comments before deciding merge readiness:

    line 46
  4. Very specific:

    Use --file <review-comments.json> with the same script when working from exported/offline review data.

    line 52
  5. Distinctive:

    Treat ingested P0/P1 findings as blockers until local verification confirms they are fixed or not applicable.

    line 54
  6. Very specific:

    Verify gh auth status

    line 70
  7. Distinctive:

    Read the full diff — not just the PR description.

    line 117
  8. Distinctive:

    Check for regressions against closed issues and recent commits.

    line 118
  9. Distinctive:

    Check for conflicts with in-flight work (same files as open PRs).

    line 119
  10. Distinctive:

    Verify the approach: correct solution, not overly complex.

    line 120
  11. Distinctive:

    Check cross-platform: Unix assumptions, Windows path handling.

    line 121
  12. Distinctive:

    Check conventions against existing project patterns.

    line 122
  13. Distinctive:

    Check for scope creep beyond the PR title.

    line 123
  14. Very specific:

    Write a per-PR resolution block (full template: docs/TRIAGE.md#pr-resolution-template) with:

    line 127
  15. Distinctive:

    IMPORTANT: All PR actions are external.

    line 136
  16. Distinctive:

    Read files named in the issue

    line 173
  17. Distinctive:

    Search for the bug class or anti-pattern

    line 175
  18. Distinctive:

    When introduced — git blame / log

    line 184
  19. Very specific:

    Write a per-issue resolution plan (full template: docs/TRIAGE.md#issue-resolution-plan-template) with:

    line 200
  20. Distinctive:

    Auto-fix: when: root cause clear and verified, fix contained to 1-3 files, no breaking changes, no architectural decisions needed.

    line 210
  21. Distinctive:

    Comment with findings: when fix needs discussion or user input: post root cause analysis, proposed fix, and questions.

    line 220
  22. Very specific:

    gh not available or not authenticated: Stop and instruct: "Run gh auth login before using /triage."

    line 266

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 176 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Triage — GitHub Issue & PR Investigator

When to Use

Don't use when: fixing a specific already-diagnosed issue (use /marshal); monitoring a single PR's CI (use /pr-watch); reviewing code quality outside of GitHub issues (use /review).

  • /triage — triage all open, unlabeled issues
  • /triage 10 — investigate issue #10 specifically
  • /triage pr 13 — review PR #13
  • /triage prs — review all open PRs
  • /triage --batch — pull all open issues, classify, investigate, report
  • /triage --stale — find issues older than 14 days with no activity
  • After the issue-monitor SessionStart hook reports new issues

Codex PR review integration

For Codex-visible PRs, decide whether to use native @codex review, local Citadel triage, or both:

node scripts/codex-pr-review.js plan --repo <owner/repo> --pr <number> --risk <low|medium|high|local-only> --write

Use native @codex review when the diff is GitHub-visible and the main need is a focused P0/P1 review. Use local Citadel triage when the answer depends on unpushed files, local generated artifacts, or hands-on edits. Use both for large or risky PRs.

After Codex posts a GitHub review, fetch and ingest the review comments before deciding merge readiness:

node scripts/codex-review-fetch.js --repo <owner/repo> --pr <number> --write

Use --file <review-comments.json> with the same script when working from exported/offline review data.

Treat ingested P0/P1 findings as blockers until local verification confirms they are fixed or not applicable.

Inputs

InputSourceRequired
Issue/PR numberArgument (e.g., /triage 10, /triage pr 13)No — omit to triage all open
Modepr prefix for PRsNo — defaults to issues
RepoAuto-detected from git remoteYes (auto)
gh CLI"/c/Program Files/GitHub CLI/gh.exe" on Windows, gh elsewhereYes (auto)

Execution Protocol

Phase 0 — Environment Setup

  1. Detect repo from git remote get-url origin, extract owner/repo
  2. Verify gh auth status
  3. Set $GH: Windows → "/c/Program Files/GitHub CLI/gh.exe", other → gh

Phase 1 — Issue Intake

Single issue (/triage 10):

$GH issue view <number> --repo <owner/repo> --json number,title,body,labels,state,comments,createdAt,updatedAt,author,assignees

Batch (/triage or --batch):

$GH issue list --repo <owner/repo> --state open --json number,title,labels,createdAt,updatedAt --limit 50

Filter to untriaged: issues with no labels, or missing priority/type label.

Stale (--stale):

$GH issue list --repo <owner/repo> --state open --json number,title,labels,createdAt,updatedAt --limit 100

Filter to issues with no activity in 14+ days.

Single PR (/triage pr 13):

$GH pr view <number> --repo <owner/repo> --json number,title,body,author,state,files,commits,comments,createdAt,headRefName,baseRefName,mergeable,reviewDecision
$GH pr diff <number> --repo <owner/repo>

All PRs (/triage prs):

$GH pr list --repo <owner/repo> --state open --json number,title,author,createdAt,labels --limit 50

Phase 1b — PR Review Protocol

PR Classification

TypeSignal
bugfixFixes a reported issue, closes #N
featureAdds new functionality
refactorRestructures without changing behavior
docsDocumentation only
infraCI/CD, build, packaging, installer

PR Review Checklist

  1. Read the full diff — not just the PR description.
  2. Check for regressions against closed issues and recent commits.
  3. Check for conflicts with in-flight work (same files as open PRs).
  4. Verify the approach: correct solution, not overly complex.
  5. Check cross-platform: Unix assumptions, Windows path handling.
  6. Check conventions against existing project patterns.
  7. Check for scope creep beyond the PR title.

PR Resolution

Write a per-PR resolution block (full template: docs/TRIAGE.md#pr-resolution-template) with:

  • Author, type, files changed count, mergeable status
  • What it does (1-3 sentences)
  • Review findings, each with a file:line reference
  • Issues found, split into Critical (blocks merge) and Non-critical (nice to fix, not blocking)
  • Recommendation checkbox: Approve / Request changes (with the specific changes needed) / Close (with reason)

PR Actions

IMPORTANT: All PR actions are external. Show the user the exact comment text and get approval before posting.

Phase 2 — Classification

Type (exactly one):

TypeSignal
bugError messages, "doesn't work", stack traces, regression
feature"Would be nice", "add support for"
question"How do I", "is it possible"
docsREADME/documentation issues
infraCI/CD, build, packaging, dependencies

Severity (bugs only):

SeverityCriteria
criticalBlocks installation or core functionality for all users
highBreaks a major feature or affects many users
mediumBreaks a minor feature or has a workaround
lowCosmetic, edge case, or easy workaround

Affected Component:

  • Citadel hooks / skills / agents
  • .claude/harness.json — project configuration
  • .planning/ — planning/campaign system
  • docs/ — documentation
  • Root files — project setup

Phase 3 — Investigation

3a. Parse the Report

Extract: error messages, environment, reproduction steps, expected vs actual behavior, workarounds.

3b. Search the Codebase

  1. Grep for exact error messages / error codes
  2. Read files named in the issue
  3. Find functions named in stack traces
  4. Search for the bug class or anti-pattern
  5. git log --oneline -20 -- <affected-files> for recent changes
  6. Cross-reference similar issues

3c. Root Cause Analysis

For bugs:

  1. What breaks — the specific code path
  2. Why it breaks — root cause, not symptom
  3. When introduced — git blame / log
  4. Who is affected — scope
  5. The fix — file:line references

For features/questions:

  1. Already possible? Search existing functionality.
  2. Where would it go? Which component/layer.
  3. Effort: trivial / small / medium / large
  4. Blockers: dependencies, architecture constraints

3d. Reproduce (when possible)

Set up conditions, run the failing command, confirm error matches, verify proposed fix resolves it.

Phase 4 — Resolution Plan

Write a per-issue resolution plan (full template: docs/TRIAGE.md#issue-resolution-plan-template) with:

  • Type, severity, component, reproducible (yes / no / not-attempted)
  • Root cause: 1-3 sentences explaining WHY
  • Affected code: <file>:<line> entries with what is wrong at each
  • Proposed fix: specific code changes with file:line references
  • Impact: who is affected, whether a workaround exists, whether it is a breaking change
  • Recommended action checkbox: Fix in next release / Needs more info from reporter / Won't fix (with reason) / Duplicate of #N

Phase 5 — Action

Auto-fix when: root cause clear and verified, fix contained to 1-3 files, no breaking changes, no architectural decisions needed.

Steps:

  1. Branch: fix/issue-<number>-<slug>
  2. Implement fix
  3. Run typecheck/build
  4. Commit: fix: <description> (closes #<number>)
  5. Push and open PR linking the issue
  6. Comment on the issue with the PR link

Comment with findings when fix needs discussion or user input: post root cause analysis, proposed fix, and questions.

Label only for questions/docs/features: add type + priority labels, optionally point to existing docs.

Phase 6 — Report

Output a Triage Summary table with columns # | Title | Type | Severity | Action | Status, one row per triaged item (example: docs/TRIAGE.md#triage-summary-example).

Label Taxonomy

Apply via $GH issue edit <number> --add-label "<label>":

Type: bug, feature, question, docs, infra Severity (bugs): critical, high, medium, low Status: needs-info, confirmed, wont-fix, duplicate

Auto-fix Handoff

---PR READY---
PR #<N>: <url>

To watch this PR automatically:
  Local  →  /pr-watch <N>
  Cloud  →  open in Claude Code web or mobile, toggle "Auto fix" ON
---

Contextual Gates

Disclosure: "Triaging GitHub issues and PRs. Read-only — no changes made without showing you first." Reversibility: green — investigation is read-only; any GitHub actions (labels, comments, PRs) shown to user for approval before posting Trust gates:

  • Any: view triage report; all external actions require explicit approval

Quality Gates

  • Every issue has a classification (type + severity for bugs)
  • Every bug has root cause with file:line references
  • Every auto-fix passes typecheck and build
  • Every PR links to the issue it fixes
  • Every issue has at least a label or comment
  • No issue comment is generic or substanceless

Fringe Cases

gh not available or not authenticated: Stop and instruct: "Run gh auth login before using /triage."

No open issues or PRs: Report "No open issues found." and exit cleanly.

Empty/unparseable issue body: Classify as needs-info, comment requesting reproduction steps.

.planning/ missing: /triage reads from GitHub, not local state. Skip .planning/ writes if missing.

Anti-Patterns — Do NOT

  • Post generic comments without substance
  • Propose fixes without reading the actual code
  • Label without investigating
  • Auto-fix when root cause is unclear
  • Close issues without explanation
  • Guess at fixes — verify by reading code and running checks

gh CLI Notes

  • Windows: "/c/Program Files/GitHub CLI/gh.exe" — always pass --repo <owner/repo>
  • Comments: $GH issue comment <number> --repo <owner/repo> --body "..."
  • Labels: $GH issue edit <number> --repo <owner/repo> --add-label "bug,high"

Exit Protocol

---HANDOFF---
- Triaged N issues: X bugs, Y features, Z questions
- Auto-fixed: <list of issue numbers with PR links>
- Needs attention: <list of issues requiring human decision>
- New labels applied: <count>
- Reversibility: green — investigation read-only; auto-fix PRs can be closed/reverted if unwanted
---

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.