verify
Skill979 starsChanged 6 days agoBSD-3-ClauseView on GitHub
Verify a change before committing it or handing it back — lint, choose the test lanes that match what changed, run them with scripts/run_tests.py on GPUs from the board, review with autoreview when the change warrants it, then fix and repeat. Use when a change is ready to commit, after a rebase, or before a stack is handed back for submission.
188 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Doist/todoist-aitheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- udecode/better-convextheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- amir20/dozzletheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Doist/todoist-clitheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kittheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflowtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use instinct-export, instinct-import and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
TheKREATORSSkillinstinct-export
Export instincts from project/global scope to a file
Also in 3 projects that use this
TheKREATORSSkillinstinct-import
Import instincts from file or URL into project/global scope
Also in 3 projects that use this
AviadPSkillrisk-assess
Assess the risk and blast radius of a proposed code change before implementing it. Evaluates CI impact, framework-wide vs localized scope, rollback path, and identifies blindspots. Use when user says "what's the risk", "is this safe", "assess the impact", "risk assess", "blast radius", or before applying framework-wide or CI-affecting changes. Do NOT use for code quality review (use code-quality) or plan validation (use design-validator).
Also in 3 projects that use this
diego-tobalinaSkillbuild-fix
Fix build and compilation errors systematically. Run when build fails.
Also in 6 projects that use this
AaravChadhaSkillsecure
Security review with a confidence gate - a finding exists only with a concrete exploit scenario and a high/medium/low confidence rating; everything else goes to a worth-hardening list, never inflated. Sweeps five surfaces: auth gates, secrets hygiene, injection and unsafe sinks, unsafe deserialization/crypto/transport, and LLM tool-use trust boundaries. Reports only, never fixes. Use when the user asks for a security review or to check vulnerabilities, secrets, or auth.
Also in 3 projects that use this
ArvorCoSkillspecify
Create feature specification from natural language description. Use when starting a new feature or creating a spec. Triggers on: create spec, specify feature, new feature spec.
Also in 10 projects that use this
- +1 more from TheKREATORS
Other versions188 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 188
- react/react★ 252ksame name
- facebook/react★ 252ksame name
- garrytan/gstack★ 141ksame name
- oven-sh/bun★ 97ksame name
- anthropics/financial-services★ 41ksame name
- anthropics/financial-services-plugins★ 41ksame name
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claude-sisyphus★ 41ksame name
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode★ 41ksame name
- anthropics/claude-quickstarts★ 19ksame name
- NVIDIA-NeMo/Speech★ 19ksame name
178 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository8 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- bench-regressionSkill
- cute-hillclimbSkill
- fix-prSkill
- fix-pr-stackSkill
- runpodSkill
- stack-historySkill
- tpuSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 167 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 23
Write the decision down in one line before running anything, for example "core change (compile_environment.py): Triton and CuTe lanes, PR …
- Very specific: line 91
Don't pass HELION_AUTOTUNE_EFFORT=none to a lane run.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 167 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Verify a change
The policy is in AGENTS.md (How Much to Test, GPU Usage, Code Review); this
skill is the procedure. Run the checks that fit the change, fix what they
find at the root (never by suppressing a test), and rerun only what is
affected.
1. Lint
./lint.sh runs the pre-commit hooks the Lint CI job runs, with their pinned
tool versions, and applies their fixes; ./lint.sh check <paths> is CI's
single pass: it fails when a hook reports a problem or changes a file and
shows the change. A clean tree before you start makes the git status
afterwards meaningful.
2. Decide the lanes
Write the decision down in one line before running anything, for example
"core change (compile_environment.py): Triton and CuTe lanes, PR tier" or
"test-only change: that module on cute". The table in AGENTS.md maps changed
paths to lanes; scripts/run_tests.py --changed lists the modules that name
your changed sources and runs them, and tells you when a change is too broad
for a selection.
Include the slow tier (--slow) for slow tests you touched and for autotune
search or interpreter-spawning changes. New test files need a
pytest --durations=20 look, and heavy ones a scripts/shard_durations.py
re-record.
3. GPUs
scripts/gpu_board.py status shows what is free. run_tests.py picks and
claims GPUs itself (-n K, or --gpus 2,5 for specific ones) and releases
them when it finishes; it refuses to start when nothing is free, or when a GPU
you named is claimed by another account or busy, rather than piling onto
someone's GPU (--force overrides). The CPU lane needs no GPU. Never run two
suites on one GPU.
4. Run
scripts/run_tests.py --changed # modules naming the sources changed since origin/main
scripts/run_tests.py --changed --since HEAD~1 # ... changed by the last commit
scripts/run_tests.py --backend cute --lane cpu # CuTe codegen check, no GPU
scripts/run_tests.py --backend cute --gpus 2,5 # CuTe lanes, GPU lane over two GPUs
scripts/run_tests.py --backend triton,cute -n 2 # core change: both backends
scripts/run_tests.py --slow test/test_autotuner.py # one module including its slow tier
scripts/run_tests.py --backend cute test/test_cute_x.py -- -k softmax # pytest options after --Each run writes logs, junit files, the exact commands and summary.txt under
.logs/tests/<timestamp>-<tag>/, and prints a VERDICT line (if the
script itself fails rather than reporting a verdict, stop and report it, per
AGENTS.md):
PASS: everything passed.FAIL: a test still fails alone, or a job crashed (read its log; an out-of-memory failure includes a GPU memory report).FLAKY: every failure passed in isolation. That is order dependence, usually state hung on a cached compiled kernel that an earlier test left behind; make the test independent of earlier launches instead of retrying.
Long runs go in a worktree if you want to keep editing meanwhile; editing the checkout a run reads corrupts its results.
5. Review
scripts/autoreview.py (uncommitted changes) or scripts/autoreview.py
--head (the last commit) when the change is a complete logical unit; skip it
for trivial fixes and run it once over the finished stack
(scripts/autoreview.py origin/main..HEAD) before handing a larger project
back. Address every finding or explain why it does not apply. When it passes,
add the autoreview passed: ... line it prints as the last line of each commit
it covered (above any stack-info: line; AGENTS.md, Recording the review). If the review
itself fails, stop and report it; do not substitute your own review. If it
warns that only one reviewer (Claude or Codex) is installed, say so to the
user.
6. Report
A short table of what ran: backend, lane, GPUs, result, and the review outcome, plus anything deliberately not run and why.
Notes:
- Don't pass
HELION_AUTOTUNE_EFFORT=noneto a lane run; it changes execution paths and breaks tests. Use it only for targeted local iteration. pytest -raprints skip reasons when a skip count looks suspicious.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

