release-checklist
Skill4 starsChanged 46 days agoMITView on GitHub
Runs the release gate from evidence — stories done, audits (security/deps/harden/perf/a11y) without blocking findings, migration compatibility, changelog, secrets/env, backup — and writes production/releases/vX.Y.Z.md with deploy and rollback steps. Run after /changelog and before /deploy, or for 'are we ready to release', 'release checklist', 'ship vX.Y.Z'.
- Reads credentials
- Commits and pushes
31 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- TrueImmortal82/open-code-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudiostheir own version, first seen Nov 4, 2026
- OneByJorah/VirtOfficetheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- erikdarlingdata/PerformanceMonitortheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- juanitourquiza/shipframetheir own version, first seen Oct 23, 2026
- maximhq/bifrosttheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use playtest-report, soak-test and 8 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
CoralGameSkillplaytest-report
Generates a structured playtest report template or analyzes existing playtest notes into a structured format. Use this to standardize playtest feedback collection and analysis.
Also in 12 projects that use this
lilangMaxSkillsoak-test
Generate a soak test protocol for extended play sessions. Defines what to observe, measure, and log during long play sessions to surface slow leaks, fatigue effects, and edge cases that only appear after sustained play. Primarily used in Polish and Release phases.
Also in 9 projects that use this
lilangMaxSkillteam-live-ops
Orchestrate the live-ops team for post-launch content planning: coordinates live-ops-designer, economy-designer, analytics-engineer, community-manager, writer, and narrative-director to design and plan a season, event, or live content update.
Also in 9 projects that use this
CoralGameSkillteam-polish
Orchestrate the polish team: coordinates performance-analyst, technical-artist, sound-designer, and qa-tester to optimize, polish, and harden a feature or area for release quality.
Also in 14 projects that use this
- +2 more from lilangMax
- +4 more from CoralGame
Other versions31 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 31
- Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 27ksame name
- maximhq/bifrost★ 9.4ksame name
- tsukumijima/KonomiTV★ 1.1ksame name
- erikdarlingdata/PerformanceMonitor★ 526same name
- nkarasiak/qgis-mcp★ 364same name
- pixel-cellar/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 324same name
- striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudios★ 118same name
- tranhieutt/software_development_department★ 71same name
- cenconq25/claude-code-app-studio★ 40same name
- OneByJorah/offivo★ 24same name
21 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository52 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- testing/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- a11y-auditSkill
- adoptSkill
- api-contractSkill
- architecture-decisionSkill
- architecture-reviewSkill
- backlogSkill
- brainstormSkill
- changelogSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- collaboration-protocolSkill
- create-storiesSkill
- data-modelSkill
- dependency-auditSkill
- deploySkill
- design-systemSkill
- dev-storySkill
- docsSkill
- feature-specSkill
- game-conceptSkill
- hardenSkill
- helpSkill
- hotfixSkill
- impactSkill
- incidentSkill
- initSkill
- migrateSkill
- pentestSkill
- perf-auditSkill
- product-specSkill
- qa-planSkill
- refactorSkill
- retrospectiveSkill
- security-auditSkill
- setup-stackSkill
- skill-improveSkill
- skill-testSkill
- sprint-planSkill
- sprint-statusSkill
- stack-updateSkill
- startSkill
- story-doneSkill
- team-featureSkill
- team-gameSkill
- team-releaseSkill
- team-securitySkill
- tech-debtSkill
- test-setupSkill
- threat-modelSkill
- updateSkill
- ux-specSkill
The file
Files
Release Checklist
Reply in the project conversation language (CLAUDE.md → Language); code, identifiers, paths and commit messages stay in English.
Template release-checklist.md; supply-chain commands from stack-reference/supply-chain.md (SC-06, SC-08…SC-10). In the commands below, <hooks> is .claude/hooks/ in copy mode and ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/ in plugin mode.
Phase 1: Evidence
A first release is one with no earlier release tag (git tag --list 'v*' is empty); two gates below apply only to it.
- Stories: the release stories are Done; check their CI tests (
gh runif available). - Audits: the latest
docs/security/security-audit-*,docs/security/hardening-checklist.md,docs/ops/perf-audit-*anddocs/ops/a11y-audit-*reports; run the/dependency-audittools now. - Changelog:
CHANGELOG.mdcontains the version. - Migrations since the last tag: backward compatibility, checked by
database-engineervia Task. - Env: new env variables are documented and present in
.env.example/ the deploy instructions. - Backup and restore: the backup and the date of the last tested restore. On the first release of a project with a database the restore drill is a gate: no date in
data-model.md§7 or the runbook → ❌ with the story to run ("Backup & restore drill",/create-storiesadds it). Later releases show the date and warn when it is older than 90 days. - Observability:
/healthzwith dependency checks, structured logs, an alert on error rate. On the first release when technical-preferences has a Deploy target this is a gate: missing → ❌ with the story to run ("Observability",/create-storiesadds it). - Security verdict:
security-leadvia Task gives the final security verdict. - Supply-chain artefacts of the release image (the digest from the release workflow summary or
docker buildx imagetools inspect <image>:vX.Y.Z). Scope first: no release image (a static site, a library) → the three items readn/a; technical-preferences without a Supply chain block, or a field recorded asnone — <reason>→ one ⚠ line per artefact with the reason, never a gate; only an artefact the block promises can be ❌:- SBOM attached to the release (SC-06):
gh release view vX.Y.Z --json assets -q '.assets[].name'listssbom.cdx.json(or the SPDX file); ❌ whensbom_toolis notnoneand the release has no SBOM asset. - Image signed and verified by digest (SC-08, SC-09):
bash .claude/docs/templates/supply-chain/verify-image.sh <image>@sha256:<digest> <owner>/<repo>(or the equivalentcosign verify … --certificate-oidc-issuer https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com --certificate-identity-regexp <release workflow>); the output is the evidence, ❌ on a failed verify or an image signed only by tag. - Provenance attestation present (SC-10):
gh attestation verify oci://<image>:vX.Y.Z -R <owner>/<repo>; ❌ when missing, unless technical-preferences (Supply chain) recordsprovenance: none — <reason>(a plan without attestations), then ⚠ with the reason. Nothing configured at all (no block, or every fieldnone) → one ⚠ line "supply chain: not configured —/harden supply-chain", not a gate; configured but failing → ❌ (a broken promise is worse than none).
- SBOM attached to the release (SC-06):
Phase 2: Checklist
Every item ✅/❌ with a link to evidence. Any ❌ in the gates → NOT READY. The verdict is written into the release file as its Verdict: line (template): Verdict: READY or Verdict: NOT READY (<the ❌ items>) — /deploy Phase 1 reads that line, so the file's presence alone never proves readiness (/hotfix writes Verdict: READY (hotfix) for a patch release).
Phase 3: Write and tag
The release file is written on READY and on NOT READY alike. The checklist with its ❌ gates is the record of what blocks the release — the next run of /release-checklist vX.Y.Z re-checks the evidence and updates the file in place; only the tag is withheld on NOT READY. Steps 1–2 therefore run for both verdicts; step 3 only on READY.
- Show the checklist in the chat, then ask "May I write
production/releases/vX.Y.Z.md(with deploy/rollback steps)?" — oneAskUserQuestion: write (Recommended) · show the draft/diff first · not now. OnNOT READYthe question says so ("NOT READY — the checklist is written with its ❌ gates, no tag"). After the "write" answer:touch .claude/.write-consent(rule 7 — the consent-guard hook checks the marker). The written file carries theVerdict:line of Phase 2; a re-run (the file already exists from an earlierNOT READY) updates it in place,Verdict:included. - Commit gate (rule 7 (4), documents lane), recorded before it is asked —
<hooks>session-state.sh set Gate "/release-checklist Phase 3: commit?"— and cleared after the answer (<hooks>session-state.sh set Gate "—"), so an open gate survives the next turn; oneAskUserQuestion: commitdocs: release vX.Y.Zon<default>and push (Recommended) · commit on the current branch · leave uncommitted. On a re-run the subject isdocs: release vX.Y.Z (re-check)— the plain subject is already in the history. On the first option:git switch <default> && git pull --ff-only origin <default>(the new file travels with the switch),git add production/releases/vX.Y.Z.md,git commit -m "docs: release vX.Y.Z"(or… (re-check)),git push. The tag must contain the release document, so this commit comes before the tag. - Tag, only on
READY(onNOT READYthis step is skipped and the verdict names the ❌ items to fix), only after the step 2 commit is on<default>, and as its ownAskUserQuestion(recorded asGate "/release-checklist Phase 3: tag?"and cleared after the answer, as the commit gate above): tag and push now (Recommended) · not now. Releases are tags on the default branch, never on a story branch (git-workflow):git tag -a vX.Y.Z -m "Release vX.Y.Z", thengit push origin vX.Y.Z—/deploychecks CI on the tag, which runs only once the tag is on origin. Without-m,git tag -aopens an editor the session cannot use. The release document left uncommitted or on another branch → no tag; say why.
Verdict: READY | NOT READY (…). Next step — one AskUserQuestion: /deploy vX.Y.Z (Recommended on READY) · fix the NOT READY items, then re-run /release-checklist vX.Y.Z (Recommended on NOT READY) · stop here.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

