release-checklist
Skill0 starsChanged 41 days agoMITView on GitHub
Run the checks that get skipped when publishing or pushing under time pressure, and fail on all of them at once. Use before a release, a publish, or a push to a shared branch; when a change is about to leave the machine; when asked whether something is ready to ship, is good to go, or can I push; or when checking for a leaked key in tracked files. Ships scripts/pre-publish.mjs, which reports the clean tree, unpushed commits, secrets in tracked files, `package.json` version, skill validation, `TODO:` markers, and the test or build script, exiting 1 and naming every failure at once. Use `--quick` to skip the slow gates and `--skip` to name an exception.
31 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudiostheir own version, first seen Nov 4, 2026
- OneByJorah/VirtOfficetheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- erikdarlingdata/PerformanceMonitortheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- juanitourquiza/shipframetheir own version, first seen Oct 23, 2026
- maximhq/bifrosttheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- OneByJorah/offivotheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use playtest-report, soak-test and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
CoralGameSkillplaytest-report
Generates a structured playtest report template or analyzes existing playtest notes into a structured format. Use this to standardize playtest feedback collection and analysis.
Also in 12 projects that use this
lilangMaxSkillsoak-test
Generate a soak test protocol for extended play sessions. Defines what to observe, measure, and log during long play sessions to surface slow leaks, fatigue effects, and edge cases that only appear after sustained play. Primarily used in Polish and Release phases.
Also in 9 projects that use this
lilangMaxSkillteam-live-ops
Orchestrate the live-ops team for post-launch content planning: coordinates live-ops-designer, economy-designer, analytics-engineer, community-manager, writer, and narrative-director to design and plan a season, event, or live content update.
Also in 9 projects that use this
CoralGameSkillteam-polish
Orchestrate the polish team: coordinates performance-analyst, technical-artist, sound-designer, and qa-tester to optimize, polish, and harden a feature or area for release quality.
Also in 14 projects that use this
- +4 more from lilangMax
- +4 more from CoralGame
Other versions31 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 31
- Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 27ksame name
- maximhq/bifrost★ 9.4ksame name
- tsukumijima/KonomiTV★ 1.1ksame name
- erikdarlingdata/PerformanceMonitor★ 526same name
- nkarasiak/qgis-mcp★ 364same name
- pixel-cellar/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 324same name
- striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudios★ 118same name
- tranhieutt/software_development_department★ 71same name
- cenconq25/claude-code-app-studio★ 40same name
- OneByJorah/offivo★ 24same name
21 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository19 other files it gives its agents.
- api-doc-recallSkill
- assistant-runtime-architectureSkill
- code-disciplineSkill
- english-requestSkill
- github-repo-opsSkill
- git-safetySkill
- long-task-continuitySkill
- opencode-config-authoringSkill
- opencode-tool-outputSkill
- powershell-windowsSkill
- provider-reconnectSkill
- reference-booksSkill
- research-synthesisSkill
- self-improvementSkill
- skill-authoringSkill
- subagent-delegationSkill
- task-closureSkill
- test-first-fixSkill
- troubleshooting-treeSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 25 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 14
Before a release, a publish, or a push to a shared branch.
- Distinctive: line 15
When a change is about to leave this machine.
- Distinctive: line 16
When asked whether something is ready to ship.
- Distinctive: line 17
When a human would otherwise run the same sequence by memory.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 25 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Release checklist
A checklist that lives only in your head is not a checklist. Under time pressure the steps that get skipped are always the slow, boring ones, and those are exactly the ones that catch a mistake.
When to use this
- Before a release, a publish, or a push to a shared branch.
- When a change is about to leave this machine.
- When asked whether something is ready to ship.
- When a human would otherwise run the same sequence by memory.
Rules
- Run the checks, do not remember them. A remembered checklist is a checklist that gets shortened under pressure, and it is shortened at exactly the steps that would have caught the problem.
- Every gate reports pass, fail, or skipped — never silence. A gate that quietly does nothing when it cannot run reads like a pass. "Skipped: no git index" and "no upstream configured" are honest answers; a missing line is not.
- Report all failures, not the first. Fixing one gate at a time means rediscovering the others one at a time, which is slower and encourages the "one more small thing" edit that breaks another gate.
- A skipped gate is not a passed gate.
--quickskips the slow checks on purpose; the output says which ones, so nobody mistakes a partial run for a full one. - A secret gate is cheap insurance. A key in a tracked file is public the moment it is pushed, and removing it from history afterwards does not un-push it. Pattern matching will miss things; it will not miss a token.
- Version, description, and topics are part of the release. A repository that exists but describes nothing is not published, it is leaked.
Gates
node scripts/pre-publish.mjs [dir] [--quick] [--skip <name>] [--json]| Gate | Checks | Cost |
| clean tree | no uncommitted changes | fast |
| branch pushed | no unpushed commits | fast |
| no secrets | key patterns in tracked files | fast |
| package version | version present | instant |
| skill validation | every SKILL.md validates | medium |
| no leftover markers | TODO: / FIXME: in tracked source | medium |
| build or test | npm test or npm run build | slow |
Exit codes: 0 all passed, 1 at least one failed, 2 could not run.
node scripts/pre-publish.mjs --quick # skip the slow gates
node scripts/pre-publish.mjs --skip "build or test" # run everything else
node scripts/pre-publish.mjs --json # for a hook--skip is for a known reason, and the reason belongs in the commit message or
the review, not only in the command line. A gate nobody can turn off is a gate
that gets deleted the first time it is inconvenient.
When a gate fails on something irrelevant
A gate that fires on an unrelated project is noise, and noise trains people to ignore the output. That is why the secret and marker gates only read files git is tracking, and why the skill gate looks for a validator in the repository before running it. If a gate is wrong for your project, fix the gate; do not learn to skim past it.
After it passes
Passing the gates means the obvious things are right, not that the change is
correct. Read the diff once more with the question "what did I not test?" — see
test-first-fix — and check that the changelog says what actually changed
rather than what was intended.
Checklist
- Gates run as commands, not from memory
- Skipped gates visible in the output
- All failures fixed, not just the first
- No secret in any tracked file
- Version bumped and description accurate
- Diff reread for what is untested
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

