agentleFS
gonimargonimar/claude-web-studio/skills/ux-spec/SKILL.md

ux-spec

Skill4 starsChanged 46 days agoMITView on GitHub

Authors a UX specification for a flow or screen — user goal, flow, screens, all states, UI copy, accessibility, responsive behaviour, UX metrics. Produces docs/specs/ux/UX-NNN-name.md. Use before implementing user-facing features.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    When HEAD is a story branch, name it and offer: switch to the default branch and commit there (Recommended — a pipeline-wide document) · …

    line 33

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

UX Spec

Reply in the project conversation language (CLAUDE.md → Language); code, identifiers, paths and commit messages stay in English.

Template .claude/docs/templates/ux-spec.md. In the commands below, <hooks> is .claude/hooks/ in copy mode and ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/ in plugin mode.

Phase 1: Context

  1. The feature spec the argument names (F-NNN, or the feature the named flow belongs to — ask when unclear). Missing → verdict BLOCKED (no feature spec — run /feature-spec F-NNN first); write nothing.
  2. Read docs/specs/design-system.md (missing → suggest /design-system, continue with the UI kit's base components from technical-preferences) and the product spec (personas, platforms).

Phase 2: Flow and screens

Questions: entry point, device, frequency. A flow sketch (mermaid flowchart), then screens with design-system components; states per screen (empty/loading/error/success/offline/no permission) are mandatory.

Phase 3: Copy, accessibility, responsive

Copy table; focus order and aria; behaviour at 320–400 px; reduced motion. accessibility-specialist via Task — a quick check of section 6, Accessibility (Haiku).

Phase 4: Write

"May I write docs/specs/ux/UX-NNN-<slug>.md?" — one AskUserQuestion: write (Recommended) · show the draft/diff first · not now. After the "write" answer: touch .claude/.write-consent (rule 7 — the consent-guard hook checks the marker).

Phase 5: Commit (documents lane)

Right after the write, one commit gate (rule 7 (4), .claude/docs/git-workflow.md § Documents): one AskUserQuestion offering docs: UX spec UX-NNN, staging exactly the written files — docs/specs/ux/UX-NNN-<slug>.md. Record the gate before asking — <hooks>session-state.sh set Gate "/ux-spec Phase 5: commit?" — and clear it after the answer (<hooks>session-state.sh set Gate "—").

  • On the default branch when no story work is in progress.
  • When HEAD is a story branch, name it and offer: switch to the default branch and commit there (Recommended — a pipeline-wide document) · commit here (the document belongs to this story) · leave uncommitted.
  • Code, configs, workflows and scripts never ride the docs: commit.

Nothing is committed without the answer.

Verdict: APPROVED | NEEDS REVISION | BLOCKED. Next step — one AskUserQuestion: /create-stories F-NNN (Recommended) · /dev-story · revise the spec; on BLOCKED: /feature-spec F-NNN (Recommended) · stop here.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.