agentleFS
gonimargonimar/claude-web-studio/skills/perf-audit/SKILL.md

perf-audit

Skill4 starsChanged 46 days agoMITView on GitHub

Measures and improves performance against budgets — Lighthouse (mobile) / Core Web Vitals, bundle analysis, API p95 with k6, DB EXPLAIN, Go/PHP profiles, game frame/draw-call/memory; ranks fixes by impact; writes docs/ops/perf-audit-<date>.md. Required before release.

14 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use triage.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • Google CloudSkill

    triage

    Gather context on a change or bug and plan the implementation.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 10 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    When HEAD is a story branch, name it and ask one AskUserQuestion: switch to the default branch and commit there (Recommended — a …

    line 36

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 10 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Perf Audit

Reply in the project conversation language (CLAUDE.md → Language); code, identifiers, paths and commit messages stay in English.

Budgets — technical-preferences.md § Performance budgets; references stack-reference/web-platform.md, database.md, graphql.md, threejs-webgames.md; template findings.md. In the commands below, <hooks> is .claude/hooks/ in copy mode and ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/ in plugin mode.

No budgets — the section is missing or still holds [N] placeholders → the audit is not blocked: the Core Web Vitals defaults of web-platform.md (LCP / INP / CLS at p75 mobile, TTFB, initial JS) are the budget for the web metrics, the Phase 2 table says so in a note ("budget: CWV default, none recorded"), API/DB/game metrics with no default are reported as NO BUDGET (measured, not judged), and the report proposes recording the budgets in technical-preferences.md (/setup-stack / /adopt field). A missing budget is never silently replaced by a guess.

Phase 1: Baseline (Bash, whatever is available)

Arguments. The mode selects the groups below: web → Lighthouse and the bundle; api → the k6 scenario; db → EXPLAIN; game → frame time, draw calls and memory; full (default) → every group the stack has. [url] is the page or endpoint to measure — with no argument the smoke URL of docs/ops/deploy.md, else ask; without a running instance web/api are reported as not measured. Web: lighthouse --preset=perf --form-factor=mobile / Lighthouse CI; ng build --stats-json / vite build + visualizer; API: k6 run scenario (create with consent); DB: EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS) on top queries, pg_stat_statements; Go pprof, PHP Blackfire/Xdebug; game: renderer.info, a Performance trace, memory. A missing tool — say so, offer installation. Playwright MCP (optional). When the Playwright MCP tools are available (mcp__plugin_web-studio_playwright__*; copy mode with a user-added server: mcp__playwright__*), drive the live page through them — browser_navigate, browser_network_requests (request count, sizes, third-party hosts), browser_console_messages (errors and warnings), browser_snapshot — and quote the tool output in the measurement file next to the Lighthouse numbers. Without the tools, the CLI path above is the baseline; nothing depends on the MCP.

Phase 2: Analysis

Table "metric → value → budget → status"; findings with estimated gain and cost; the 3 cheapest.

Phase 3: Fixes (with consent)

Through the relevant engineers; re-measure with the same method — before/after.

Phase 4: Write

  1. Show the report in the chat, then "May I write docs/ops/perf-audit-<date>.md and docs/ops/measurements/<date>-perf-audit.md?" — one AskUserQuestion: write (Recommended) · show the draft/diff first · not now. The measurement file holds the commands, the environment and the raw output of Phase 1 and of the Phase 3 re-measurements (rule 12); the report quotes its numbers from that file, never from the session state. After the "write" answer: touch .claude/.write-consent (rule 7).
  2. For every OVER BUDGET metric, one AskUserQuestion: record it in production/findings.md (PERF-NNN, template findings.md) (Recommended) · improvement stories now · report only — so the budget miss reaches /create-stories and /sprint-plan. Record the gate before asking — <hooks>session-state.sh set Gate "/perf-audit Phase 4: record PERF-NNN?" — and clear it after the answer (<hooks>session-state.sh set Gate "—"). After the "record" answer: touch .claude/.write-consent, then write the row.

Phase 5: Commit (documents lane)

Right after the write (and the findings rows, when any were recorded), one commit gate (rule 7 (4), .claude/docs/git-workflow.md § Documents): docs: perf audit <date>, staging exactly the written documents — docs/ops/perf-audit-<date>.md, docs/ops/measurements/<date>-perf-audit.md (rule 12), production/findings.md when rows were added and .claude/agent-memory/ when the run changed it (git-workflow § Agent memory). Record the gate before asking — <hooks>session-state.sh set Gate "/perf-audit Phase 5: commit?" — and clear it after the answer (<hooks>session-state.sh set Gate "—").

  • On the default branch when no story work is in progress: one AskUserQuestion — commit (Recommended) · leave uncommitted.
  • When HEAD is a story branch, name it and ask one AskUserQuestion: switch to the default branch and commit there (Recommended — a pipeline-wide document) · commit here (the document belongs to this story) · leave uncommitted.
  • A k6 scenario created in Phase 1 and the Phase 3 fixes are code, not documents: they never ride the docs: commit — name them and offer the improvement story they belong to or the chore lane (git-workflow.md § Chore / infra, branch chore/<slug>).

Nothing is committed without the answer.

Verdict: WITHIN BUDGET | OVER BUDGET (metrics: …). Next step — one AskUserQuestion: improvement stories (Recommended) · /release-checklist · re-run /perf-audit after fixes.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.