clarify
Skill441 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
UX copy review across buttons, errors, empty states, and form hints — critiques by default, applies only on request. Use when copy feels vague, generic, or AI-sounding, or when the user says \"fix the labels\", \"improve error messages\", or \"review the copy\". Invoke when the user asks for clarify on their UI, or mentions 'clarify' alongside design / UI / frontend work.
81 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- RichardDow/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- ZaxbyHub/opencode-swarmtheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- Integralist/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 14, 2026
- theexperiencecompany/gaiatheir own version, first seen Nov 13, 2026
- PeanutGT/NutsSkillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- venhdev/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use arrange, teach-impeccable and 3 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
HK-hubSkillarrange
Improve layout, spacing, and visual rhythm. Fixes monotonous grids, inconsistent spacing, and weak visual hierarchy. Use when the user mentions layout feeling off, spacing issues, visual hierarchy, crowded UI, alignment problems, or wanting better composition.
Also in 14 projects that use this
HK-hubSkillteach-impeccable
One-time setup that gathers design context for your project and saves it to your AI config file. Run once to establish persistent design guidelines.
Also in 17 projects that use this
zwy123zwySkillnormalize
将用户随意输入的提示词规范化为结构清晰、便于大模型执行的标准化提示词。适用于需要整理、统一提示词格式时调用。
Also in 19 projects that use this
owshq-mecSkilllayout
Improve layout, spacing, and visual rhythm. Fixes monotonous grids, inconsistent spacing, and weak visual hierarchy. Use when the user mentions layout feeling off, spacing issues, visual hierarchy, crowded UI, alignment problems, or wanting better composition.
Also in 8 projects that use this
- +1 more from HK-hub
Other versions81 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 81
- spool-lab/spool★ 592same name
- paperboytm/spool★ 590same name
- talesofai/cohub★ 585same name
- ZaxbyHub/opencode-swarm★ 531same name
- zaxbysauce/opencode-swarm★ 519same name
- nexmoe/DayBee★ 424same name
- nexmoe/eve★ 424same name
- ryanthedev/code-foundations★ 381same name
- Southclaws/storyden★ 348same name
- 10xChengTu/Mux0★ 337same name
71 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository36 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/ui-craft/references/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- adaptSkill
- animateSkill
- auditSkill
- bolderSkill
- briefSkill
- colorizeSkill
- craftSkill
- critiqueSkill
- delightSkill
- distillSkill
- extractSkill
- finalizeSkill
- hardenSkill
- heuristicSkill
- polishSkill
- quieterSkill
- redesignSkill
- rememberSkill
- sddesignSkill
- shapeSkill
- startSkill
- tokensSkill
- typesetSkill
- ui-craft-dense-dashboardSkill
- ui-craft-editorialSkill
- ui-craft-minimalSkill
- ui-craftSkill
- unhappySkill
- friction-logSkill
- friction-logSkill
- ui-craft-dense-dashboardSkill
- ui-craft-editorialSkill
- ui-craft-minimalSkill
- ui-craftSkill
The file
Files
<!-- HARNESS MIRROR — do not edit here. Canonical source: skills/ or commands/. After editing source, copy into cli/assets/<harness>/ and repo-root harness mirrors. -->Context: this sub-skill is one lens of the broader ui-craft skill. If the ui-craft skill is also installed, read its SKILL.md first for Discovery + Anti-Slop + Craft Test, then apply the specific lens below.
Clarify the copy in $ARGUMENTS. Load the ui-craft skill.
Default mode: critique, not edit. Return the copy diff in a Review Format table. Only apply changes if the user says "apply".
Checklist — walk the UI and flag every instance:
- Button labels — verb + object. "Send invite" > "Submit". "Delete project" > "Delete". Never "OK", "Submit", "Click here".
- Errors — inline, specific, actionable. "Email already in use — sign in or use another address." Never "Something went wrong."
- Empty states — one line explaining why empty + one CTA. "No projects yet. Create your first." not "It's empty here!"
- Form hints — below the field, persistent, not just validation-triggered. "Must include a number and a symbol" as helper text, not as an error after submit.
- Confirmation language — past tense, subject-first. "Project deleted." > "Successfully deleted project."
- Destructive actions — the noun lives in the button. "Delete {projectName}" > "Delete". The dialog confirms; the button commits.
- Case — sentence case by default. Title Case only for branded product names. Never ALL CAPS (exception: 11-13px category labels, already in SKILL.md).
- Voice — clear > clever. Active voice. Short sentences. Real words ("cancel" not "discontinue", "start" not "initiate").
Knob-agnostic — clarity is not tunable. Run the full checklist regardless of CRAFT_LEVEL.
References to read: references/copy.md (microcopy voice + patterns), references/accessibility.md (error message expectations for screen readers).
Output format — the Review Format table:
| Before | After | Why |
Prioritize by impact (errors and destructive actions first, then CTAs, then helper copy). End with a one-paragraph summary of the overall voice shift. If the user says "apply", edit the code and re-print the table with file paths.
Next step: /critique — copy changes shift hierarchy; re-read the surface after (rung 1).
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

