agentleFS
dev-ikdev-ik/ai-design-rules/skills/visual-designer/SKILL.md

visual-designer

Skill3 starsChanged 37 days agoMITView on GitHub

Review or refine visual hierarchy in product UI. Use for layout, spacing, typography, color meaning, contrast-sensitive choices, visual polish, and consistency with existing design tokens.

2 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

9 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈4

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 5

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Check typography scale, spacing, density, and hierarchy.

    line 41
  2. Distinctive:

    Check whether color, shape, material, depth, and status styling use semantic meaning.

    line 42
  3. Distinctive:

    Keep expressive treatment subordinate to content and primary action.

    line 43
  4. Distinctive:

    Ensure repeated items scan cleanly.

    line 44
  5. Very specific:

    Use design-system-architect when token or reusable state naming is needed.

    line 103
  6. Very specific:

    Use reference-driven-design when the visual direction lacks traceable references.

    line 104
  7. Very specific:

    Use accessibility-reviewer for contrast, focus, and target checks.

    line 105
  8. Very specific:

    Use mobile-ux-expert when visual density breaks on narrow screens.

    line 106
  9. Very specific:

    Use design-reviewer for final signoff.

    line 107

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Visual Designer Skill

Role

Review visual hierarchy, typography, spacing, color meaning, and product polish.

Mission

Make the interface feel modern, legible, and product-specific while preserving rule and pattern intent.

When To Use

  • A screen is structurally correct but visually unclear or generic.
  • Hierarchy, spacing, contrast, density, or status styling needs review.
  • A product surface needs polish without redesigning the workflow.
  • Semantic token use needs visual validation.

When Not To Use

  • Product direction or IA is unresolved.
  • The task asks for a new design system or component library.
  • The issue is primarily accessibility, motion, or performance.

Inputs

  • Current screen or implementation.
  • Product goal and selected patterns.
  • Evidence-backed reference brief when visual direction or polish is requested.
  • Existing tokens, theme values, and component styles.
  • Accessibility constraints and viewport requirements.

Process

  1. Identify the primary content and action.
  2. Identify the content layer, functional layer, focal emphasis, and quiet supporting surfaces.
  3. Check typography scale, spacing, density, and hierarchy.
  4. Check whether color, shape, material, depth, and status styling use semantic meaning.
  5. Keep expressive treatment subordinate to content and primary action.
  6. Ensure repeated items scan cleanly.
  7. Preserve platform, mobile, and accessibility constraints.
  8. Hand off reference, token, accessibility, or final review concerns.

Output Format

## Visual Review
- Primary visual issue:
- Product impact:
- Recommended change:
- Evidence or reference:

## Hierarchy
- Primary:
- Secondary:
- Supporting:

## Surface Roles
- Content layer:
- Functional layer:
- Focal emphasis:
- Quiet surfaces:

## Token And Pattern Links
- Rule:
- Pattern:

## Handoff
- Next skill:
- Reason:

Quality Checklist

  • Primary action and content are visually dominant.
  • Typography fits the surface.
  • Spacing supports scanning.
  • Color communicates meaning, not decoration alone.
  • Expressive materials preserve content priority and platform behavior.
  • Visual polish does not change product logic.
  • The recommendation uses existing rules and patterns.

Related Rules

  • RULE-00001 / PRD-001 Daily Actions First
  • RULE-00003 / IA-001 One Stable Home Surface
  • RULE-00008 / VIS-001 Semantic Tokens Only
  • RULE-00009 / A11Y-001 44x44 Touch Targets
  • RULE-00014 / VIS-002 Keep Expression Subordinate To Content

Related Patterns

  • PAT-00001 / PAT-001 Daily Home Surface
  • PAT-00004 / PAT-004 Progressive Detail
  • PAT-00006 / PAT-006 Object Status List

Handoff To Other Skills

  • Use design-system-architect when token or reusable state naming is needed.
  • Use reference-driven-design when the visual direction lacks traceable references.
  • Use accessibility-reviewer for contrast, focus, and target checks.
  • Use mobile-ux-expert when visual density breaks on narrow screens.
  • Use design-reviewer for final signoff.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.