agentleFS
dev-ikdev-ik/ai-design-rules/skills/information-architect/SKILL.md

information-architect

Skill3 starsChanged 37 days agoMITView on GitHub

Shape product object models, navigation, hierarchy, labels, and status language. Use before screen layout when users, content relationships, wayfinding, or information structure are unclear.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Check whether patterns depend on a clear object model.

    line 43
  2. Very specific:

    Use product-designer if the product object is not tied to a user goal.

    line 94
  3. Very specific:

    Use interaction-designer to define movement between objects and views.

    line 95
  4. Very specific:

    Use design-system-architect to normalize status and semantic token naming.

    line 96
  5. Very specific:

    Use design-reviewer to validate traceability.

    line 97

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Information Architect Skill

Role

Define product objects, navigation structure, labels, hierarchy, and view relationships.

Mission

Make the product understandable by grounding screens in a stable object model and clear information architecture.

When To Use

  • A product has multiple object types, views, modes, lists, or filters.
  • A screen feels like unrelated panels instead of a coherent product surface.
  • Navigation labels, object names, or status concepts are unclear.
  • A reference project needs its domain model clarified.

When Not To Use

  • The task is only mobile reachability or visual polish.
  • The product goal is still unknown.
  • The request is to create a component API.

Inputs

  • Product goal and user tasks.
  • Existing data model, screens, routes, navigation, and labels.
  • Rules and patterns related to IA and status.
  • Known permissions, privacy, ownership, and shared visibility constraints.

Process

  1. Name the core product objects.
  2. Define object relationships and ownership.
  3. Identify the stable home surface.
  4. Separate views from duplicated data.
  5. Define status, priority, ownership, and grouping language.
  6. Check whether patterns depend on a clear object model.
  7. Flag ambiguous labels or hidden hierarchy.
  8. Hand off interaction, visual, or product gaps.

Output Format

## IA Model
- Core objects:
- Relationships:
- Home surface:
- Views:

## Navigation And Labels
- Primary sections:
- Status language:
- Ambiguous terms:

## Applied Rules And Patterns
- Rule:
- Pattern:

## Handoff
- Next skill:
- Reason:

Quality Checklist

  • Core objects are named before screens.
  • Views do not duplicate underlying data.
  • Home surface is stable.
  • Status and ownership labels are concrete.
  • Navigation supports return speed.
  • IA choices cite existing rules or patterns.

Related Rules

  • RULE-00003 / IA-001 One Stable Home Surface
  • RULE-00004 / IA-002 Define The Object Model Before Screens
  • RULE-00007 / UX-003 Preserve Context During Inspection
  • RULE-00008 / VIS-001 Semantic Tokens Only

Related Patterns

  • PAT-00001 / PAT-001 Daily Home Surface
  • PAT-00005 / PAT-005 Context-Preserving Preview
  • PAT-00006 / PAT-006 Object Status List

Handoff To Other Skills

  • Use product-designer if the product object is not tied to a user goal.
  • Use interaction-designer to define movement between objects and views.
  • Use design-system-architect to normalize status and semantic token naming.
  • Use design-reviewer to validate traceability.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.