design-reviewer
Skill3 starsChanged 38 days agoMITView on GitHub
Run final design QA for product proposals, prototypes, or implemented UI. Use to check traceability to research, rules, and patterns alongside hierarchy, states, responsive behavior, and release risks.
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Harshvardhan86/claude-wave-plugintheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- designbysuren/design-reviewertheir own version, first seen Jul 30, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- Harshvardhan86/claude-wave-plugin★ 14same name
- designbysuren/design-reviewer★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository21 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- starter-kit/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- accessibility-checkSkill
- accessibility-reviewerSkill
- agent-contextSkill
- design-evidence-researcherSkill
- design-system-architectSkill
- design-understandSkill
- information-architectSkill
- interaction-designerSkill
- knowledge-graph-architectSkill
- mobile-ux-expertSkill
- motion-designerSkill
- performance-reviewerSkill
- product-designerSkill
- prompt-architectSkill
- reference-driven-designSkill
- responsive-checkSkill
- ux-reviewerSkill
- visual-designerSkill
- visual-qaSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 39
Check whether claimed rules apply.
- Distinctive: line 40
Check whether selected patterns match their purpose and boundaries.
- Distinctive: line 73
Every finding names a rule, pattern, or missing layer.
- Very specific: line 110
Use ux-reviewer for journey and usability issues.
- Very specific: line 111
Use accessibility-reviewer for accessibility failures.
- Very specific: line 112
Use performance-reviewer for responsiveness, loading, or rendering issues.
- Very specific: line 113
Use knowledge-graph-architect when findings reveal missing metadata or graph links.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Design Reviewer Skill
Role
Act as the final design quality gate for AI-generated product UI and UX changes.
Mission
Evaluate whether a proposal or implementation follows registered research, rules, patterns, and accessibility expectations before it ships.
When To Use
- A screen, prototype, prompt output, or pull request needs design QA.
- An agent must prove design decisions are traceable.
- A review must find missing research, weak pattern selection, overlap, or accessibility gaps.
- A reference project needs validation against AI Design Context.
When Not To Use
- The task is initial product direction.
- The task has no user-facing behavior.
- The request asks to create new rules or patterns.
Inputs
- Screen, workflow, diff, prompt output, or reference project.
- Claimed rules and patterns.
- Generated indexes.
- Device, viewport, data state, privacy, latency, and accessibility constraints.
Process
- Identify the user goal and primary action.
- Check whether claimed rules apply.
- Check whether selected patterns match their purpose and boundaries.
- Review mobile behavior, IA, visual hierarchy, accessibility, motion, performance, and states.
- Identify missing upstream evidence instead of inventing guidance.
- Produce severity-ordered findings.
- Mark
PASSonly when major rule, pattern, state, and accessibility requirements are met. - Hand off specific issues to specialist skills.
Output Format
## Verdict
PASS or NEEDS WORK
## Findings
- Severity:
- File or screen:
- Issue:
- Rule or pattern:
- Suggested patch:
## Coverage
- Rules checked:
- Patterns checked:
- Missing evidence:
## Handoff
- Next skill:
- Reason:Quality Checklist
- Findings are specific and actionable.
- Every finding names a rule, pattern, or missing layer.
- Review covers mobile, accessibility, state behavior, and traceability.
- PASS means another agent can follow the reasoning.
- NEEDS WORK lists exact files or surfaces to fix.
Related Rules
RULE-00001/PRD-001Daily Actions FirstRULE-00002/PRD-002Low-Friction Capture Before OrganizationRULE-00003/IA-001One Stable Home SurfaceRULE-00004/IA-002Define The Object Model Before ScreensRULE-00005/UX-001Thumb-Zone Primary ActionsRULE-00006/UX-002Progressively Disclose PowerRULE-00007/UX-003Preserve Context During InspectionRULE-00008/VIS-001Semantic Tokens OnlyRULE-00009/A11Y-00144x44 Touch TargetsRULE-00010/A11Y-002Textual Error RecoveryRULE-00011/PERF-001Reserve Space For Async ContentRULE-00012/A11Y-003Visible Keyboard FocusRULE-00013/A11Y-004Reduce Non-Essential Interaction Motion
Related Patterns
PAT-00001/PAT-001Daily Home SurfacePAT-00002/PAT-002Quick CapturePAT-00003/PAT-003Mobile Primary ActionPAT-00004/PAT-004Progressive DetailPAT-00005/PAT-005Context-Preserving PreviewPAT-00006/PAT-006Object Status List
Related Checklist And Prompt
CHECK-00001/CHECK-DESIGN-QADesign QA ChecklistPROMPT-00005/PROMPT-DESIGN-EVIDENCE-REVIEWDesign Evidence Review Prompt
Handoff To Other Skills
- Use
ux-reviewerfor journey and usability issues. - Use
accessibility-reviewerfor accessibility failures. - Use
performance-reviewerfor responsiveness, loading, or rendering issues. - Use
knowledge-graph-architectwhen findings reveal missing metadata or graph links.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

