knowledge-graph-architect
Skill3 starsChanged 37 days agoMITView on GitHub
Maintain the AI Design Context knowledge graph. Use when changing schemas, object metadata, registries, typed relationships, generated indexes, validation scope, or DesignLint readiness.
In this repository21 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- starter-kit/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- accessibility-checkSkill
- accessibility-reviewerSkill
- agent-contextSkill
- design-evidence-researcherSkill
- design-reviewerSkill
- design-system-architectSkill
- design-understandSkill
- information-architectSkill
- interaction-designerSkill
- mobile-ux-expertSkill
- motion-designerSkill
- performance-reviewerSkill
- product-designerSkill
- prompt-architectSkill
- reference-driven-designSkill
- responsive-checkSkill
- ux-reviewerSkill
- visual-designerSkill
- visual-qaSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 14
Keep objects, metadata, generated indexes, relationships, and validation behavior consistent as the repository grows.
- Distinctive: line 41
Check ID, alias, slug, status, maturity, and relationship conventions.
- Distinctive: line 42
Verify relationship direction and type.
- Distinctive: line 43
Check generated indexes and graph diagnostics.
- Very specific: line 44
Run or request npm run check.
- Distinctive: line 46
Avoid changing content meaning while fixing graph structure.
- Very specific: line 93
Use prompt-architect when prompts need graph-backed instructions.
- Very specific: line 94
Use design-reviewer when graph findings affect UX quality.
- Very specific: line 95
Use product-designer when a missing object reflects unclear product intent.
- Very specific: line 96
Use accessibility-reviewer when checklists or validation must cover accessibility.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Knowledge Graph Architect Skill
Role
Maintain AI Design Context as a schema-first knowledge graph.
Mission
Keep objects, metadata, generated indexes, relationships, and validation behavior consistent as the repository grows.
When To Use
- A change affects schemas, registry files, generated indexes, object metadata, or relationship types.
- A contributor needs to add or migrate a knowledge object type.
- The graph has orphans, missing targets, duplicate concepts, or stale generated files.
- DesignLint readiness or validation scope is being changed.
When Not To Use
- The task is only product UX, visual design, or accessibility review.
- The request asks for new design advice without source research.
- The change is a local UI implementation with no repository architecture impact.
Inputs
docs/KNOWLEDGE_ENGINE.mdschema/*.schema.jsonregistry/objects.jsonregistry/relationships.json- Generated indexes and graph report.
- Target files or object type being changed.
Process
- Identify affected object types.
- Check ID, alias, slug, status, maturity, and relationship conventions.
- Verify relationship direction and type.
- Check generated indexes and graph diagnostics.
- Run or request
npm run check. - Flag missing schema, registry, or validation coverage.
- Avoid changing content meaning while fixing graph structure.
Output Format
## Graph Assessment
- Object types affected:
- Registry impact:
- Relationship impact:
- Generated index impact:
## Findings
- Issue:
- File:
- Suggested fix:
## Validation
- Command:
- Result:
## Handoff
- Next skill:
- Reason:Quality Checklist
- IDs are stable and globally unique.
- Aliases and slugs are unique where required.
- Relationship targets resolve.
- Generated indexes are not edited manually.
- Manual indexes are treated as transitional.
- Validation scope is honestly documented.
Related Rules
RULE-00003/IA-001One Stable Home SurfaceRULE-00004/IA-002Define The Object Model Before ScreensRULE-00008/VIS-001Semantic Tokens Only
Related Patterns
PAT-00001/PAT-001Daily Home SurfacePAT-00006/PAT-006Object Status List
Handoff To Other Skills
- Use
prompt-architectwhen prompts need graph-backed instructions. - Use
design-reviewerwhen graph findings affect UX quality. - Use
product-designerwhen a missing object reflects unclear product intent. - Use
accessibility-reviewerwhen checklists or validation must cover accessibility.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

