package-evidence
Skill14 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Paste this into Grok Bot after a successful run: Save the process we just used as a skill called “Package Evidence”. A useful skill states the six fields from Skills and routines. An agent or Bot run finished and a human needs an evidence pack before a ship/block verdict — what happened, what was verified, what was not. No claim is marked verified without an artifact pointer. Missing tests are listed as missing, not implied by a green story. Evidence…
In this repository49 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- convert/claude.mdCLAUDE.md
- docs/llms.txtllms.txt
- audit-subscriptionsSkill
- cited-researchSkill
- cloud-bill-noteSkill
- collate-feature-asksSkill
- coordinate-launchSkill
- daily-digestSkill
- defend-calendarSkill
- design-bot-templateSkill
- detect-docs-driftSkill
- diff-competitorsSkill
- draft-call-followupSkill
- draft-changelogSkill
- draft-issueSkill
- draft-newsletterSkill
- draft-security-answersSkill
- draft-sqlSkill
- draft-support-replySkill
- garden-memorySkill
- harden-repoSkill
- incident-timelineSkill
- install-teamSkill
- interrogate-assumptionsSkill
- investigate-perfSkill
- log-promisesSkill
- plan-tripSkill
- prep-meetingSkill
- queue-socialSkill
- ramp-new-hireSkill
- rank-account-healthSkill
- recommend-media-reallocSkill
- reconcile-expensesSkill
- remix-contentSkill
- reproduce-bugSkill
- research-accountsSkill
- review-pr-riskSkill
- route-workSkill
- sanitize-shareSkill
- scout-x-threadsSkill
- source-talentSkill
- sweep-ciSkill
- triage-inboxSkill
- vendor-renewalsSkill
- watch-aeoSkill
- watch-brandSkill
- weekly-saas-financeSkill
- write-win-lossSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
- Distinctive: line 16
Run notes, logs, diffs, or conversation
- Distinctive: line 18
Test or review output when it exists
- Distinctive: line 26
Do not issue the verdict. That is the human's job.
- Distinctive: line 30
No claim is marked verified without an artifact pointer.
- Distinctive: line 40
Do not merge, deploy, or tag a release.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Package Evidence
Paste this into Grok Bot after a successful run:
Save the process we just used as a skill called “Package Evidence”.
A useful skill states the six fields from Skills and routines.
1. When to use it
An agent or Bot run finished and a human needs an evidence pack before a ship/block verdict — what happened, what was verified, what was not.
2. Required inputs and access
- Run notes, logs, diffs, or conversation
- The original request and constraints
- Test or review output when it exists
3. Sequence of work
- Restate the request and the claimed outcome.
- Collect artifacts that actually exist (links, files, command output).
- Mark each claim verified / unverified / contradicted.
- List residual risk and what a human still has to look at.
- Do not issue the verdict. That is the human's job.
4. How to validate the result
No claim is marked verified without an artifact pointer. Missing tests are listed as missing, not implied by a green story.
5. What to return
Evidence pack: Request, Artifacts, Verified, Unverified, Residual risk, Questions for the verdict.
6. What requires approval
Do not merge, deploy, or tag a release. Do not write the human's rationale for them.
Type / in the composer to reference a saved skill. If it does not appear, open Settings → Plugins → Yours and enable it for this Bot.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

