agentleFS
cobusgreylingcobusgreyling/grok-bot-templates/skills/draft-issue/SKILL.md

draft-issue

Skill14 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Paste this into Grok Bot after a successful run: Save the process we just used as a skill called “Draft Issue”. A useful skill states the six fields from Skills and routines. A Slack thread, email, or repro pack must become a GitHub issue before the bug evaporates — written down, not posted until approved. Steps are numbered. Links work. No customer PII. No "please fix" without expected behavior. Issue title, body in the repo template, suggested labels, and a…

6 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Prefer the repro pack over the original complaint when both exist.

    line 23
  2. Distinctive:

    Stop with a preview. Do not click Submit.

    line 25
  3. Distinctive:

    Do not create the GitHub issue until the owner says to file it.

    line 39

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Draft Issue

Paste this into Grok Bot after a successful run:

Save the process we just used as a skill called “Draft Issue”.

A useful skill states the six fields from Skills and routines.

1. When to use it

A Slack thread, email, or repro pack must become a GitHub issue before the bug evaporates — written down, not posted until approved.

2. Required inputs and access

  • Thread, report, or repro pack
  • Target repository
  • Issue template if the repo has one

3. Sequence of work

  1. Extract title, actual, expected, steps, environment, and links.
  2. Prefer the repro pack over the original complaint when both exist.
  3. Fill the repo's issue template. Label suggestions only.
  4. Stop with a preview. Do not click Submit.

4. How to validate the result

Steps are numbered. Links work. No customer PII. No "please fix" without expected behavior.

5. What to return

Issue title, body in the repo template, suggested labels, and a "ready to file" checkbox for the owner.

6. What requires approval

Do not create the GitHub issue until the owner says to file it.

Type / in the composer to reference a saved skill. If it does not appear, open Settings → Plugins → Yours and enable it for this Bot.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.